Use of hydraulic tests to identify the residual CO2 saturation at a geological storage site

► Hydraulic experiments before and after a CO2 push–pull test can estimate residual CO2. ► We present a methodology to interpret these tests analytically and numerically. ► We analyze which parameters can be estimated. ► Both skin hydraulic conductivity and storativity can be obtained from the test....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of greenhouse gas control 2013-11, Vol.19, p.652-664
Main Authors: Martinez-Landa, Lurdes, Rötting, Tobias S., Carrera, Jesús, Russian, Anna, Dentz, Marco, Cubillo, Bruno
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analytical solution
Carbon capture and storage
Enginyeria civil
Geologia
Hidrologia subterrània
Hydraulic testing
Type curves
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:► Hydraulic experiments before and after a CO2 push–pull test can estimate residual CO2. ► We present a methodology to interpret these tests analytically and numerically. ► We analyze which parameters can be estimated. ► Both skin hydraulic conductivity and storativity can be obtained from the test. Estimating long term capillary trapping of CO2 in aquifers remains a key challenge for CO2 storage. Zhang et al. (2011) proposed a combination of thermal, tracer, and hydraulic experiments to estimate the amount of CO2 trapped in the formation after a CO2 push and pull test. Of these three types of experiments, hydraulic tests are the simplest to perform and possibly the most informative. However, their potential has not yet been fully exploited. Here, we present a methodology to interpret these tests and analyze which parameters can be estimated. We use numerical and analytical solutions to a continuous injection in a medium where residual CO2 has caused a reduction in hydraulic conductivity and an increase in storage coefficient over a finite thickness (a few meters) skin around the injection well. We interpret the model results using conventional pressure buildup and diagnostic plots as well as the Agarwal (1980) recovery plots. We find that both skin hydraulic conductivity and storage coefficient (and thus residual CO2 saturation) can be obtained from the water injection test provided that water flow rate is carefully controlled and head buildup is measured with high frequency at the beginning of the test.
ISSN:1750-5836
1878-0148
DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.01.043