Loading…
Discourse comprehension in L2: Making sense of what is not explicitly said
•L2 speakers integrate multiple sources of information during discourse comprehension.•Processes involved in L1 and L2 discourse comprehension are similar.•L2 speakers can make causal inferences online.•L2 discourse processing is incremental. Using ERPs, we tested whether L2 speakers can integrate m...
Saved in:
Published in: | Brain and language 2016-12, Vol.163, p.32-41 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-925591af6529e8d7bff4411beb825d3702a9fdfb53d0e73eb1b5833091f603113 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-925591af6529e8d7bff4411beb825d3702a9fdfb53d0e73eb1b5833091f603113 |
container_end_page | 41 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 32 |
container_title | Brain and language |
container_volume | 163 |
creator | Foucart, Alice Romero-Rivas, Carlos Gort, Bernharda Lottie Costa, Albert |
description | •L2 speakers integrate multiple sources of information during discourse comprehension.•Processes involved in L1 and L2 discourse comprehension are similar.•L2 speakers can make causal inferences online.•L2 discourse processing is incremental.
Using ERPs, we tested whether L2 speakers can integrate multiple sources of information (e.g., semantic, pragmatic information) during discourse comprehension. We presented native speakers and L2 speakers with three-sentence scenarios in which the final sentence was highly causally related, intermediately related, or causally unrelated to its context; its interpretation therefore required simple or complex inferences. Native speakers revealed a gradual N400-like effect, larger in the causally unrelated condition than in the highly related condition, and falling in-between in the intermediately related condition, replicating previous results. In the crucial intermediately related condition, L2 speakers behaved like native speakers, however, showing extra processing in a later time-window. Overall, the results show that, when reading, L2 speakers are able to process information from the local context and prior information (e.g., world knowledge) to build global coherence, suggesting that they process different sources of information to make inferences online during discourse comprehension, like native speakers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.09.001 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_csuc_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_csuc_recercat_oai_recercat_cat_2072_331078</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0093934X16300827</els_id><sourcerecordid>0001224634</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-925591af6529e8d7bff4411beb825d3702a9fdfb53d0e73eb1b5833091f603113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoO4uOPqLxAk4MVL96by0ekIHmT92mXEi4K3kE5Xuxl7OrNJt7r_3owzKngQDyFUeN5K1fsS8ghYDQya803duakfa16KmpmaMbhDVsAMqzgodZesGDOiMkJ-OiX3c94UAGQL98gp100jtTYrcvUyZB-XlJH6uN0lvMYphzjRMNE1f0bfuS9h-kxzeUUaB_rt2s00ZDrFmeL33Rh8mMdbml3oH5CTwY0ZHx7vM_Lx9asPF2-r9fs3lxcv1pVXTM-V4UoZcEOjuMG2190wSAnQYddy1QvNuDNDP3RK9Ay1wA461QrBDAwNEwDijMChr8-Ltwk9Ju9mG134U-wPZ5pbIYDptmieHjS7FG8WzLPdlr1xHN2EcckW2jKblqDgP1ApDIDWTUGf_IVuipVTWb5Q2hgpWy4LJY7zpphzwsHuUti6dGuB2X2SdmN_Jmn3SVpmbAmqqB4fey_dFvvfml_RFeD5AcDi9deAyWYfcPLYh2LDbPsY_vnBD2yvrSI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1879944824</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discourse comprehension in L2: Making sense of what is not explicitly said</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Foucart, Alice ; Romero-Rivas, Carlos ; Gort, Bernharda Lottie ; Costa, Albert</creator><creatorcontrib>Foucart, Alice ; Romero-Rivas, Carlos ; Gort, Bernharda Lottie ; Costa, Albert</creatorcontrib><description>•L2 speakers integrate multiple sources of information during discourse comprehension.•Processes involved in L1 and L2 discourse comprehension are similar.•L2 speakers can make causal inferences online.•L2 discourse processing is incremental.
Using ERPs, we tested whether L2 speakers can integrate multiple sources of information (e.g., semantic, pragmatic information) during discourse comprehension. We presented native speakers and L2 speakers with three-sentence scenarios in which the final sentence was highly causally related, intermediately related, or causally unrelated to its context; its interpretation therefore required simple or complex inferences. Native speakers revealed a gradual N400-like effect, larger in the causally unrelated condition than in the highly related condition, and falling in-between in the intermediately related condition, replicating previous results. In the crucial intermediately related condition, L2 speakers behaved like native speakers, however, showing extra processing in a later time-window. Overall, the results show that, when reading, L2 speakers are able to process information from the local context and prior information (e.g., world knowledge) to build global coherence, suggesting that they process different sources of information to make inferences online during discourse comprehension, like native speakers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-934X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2155</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.09.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27664779</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bilingualism ; Causal inferences ; Coherence ; Comprehension ; Comprehension - physiology ; Context ; Discourse comprehension ; ERPs ; Evoked Potentials ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Pragmatics ; Reading ; Second language learning ; Semantics ; Speech Perception - physiology</subject><ispartof>Brain and language, 2016-12, Vol.163, p.32-41</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Dec 2016</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess © Elsevier <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.09.001">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.09.001</a></rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-925591af6529e8d7bff4411beb825d3702a9fdfb53d0e73eb1b5833091f603113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-925591af6529e8d7bff4411beb825d3702a9fdfb53d0e73eb1b5833091f603113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27922,27923,31267</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27664779$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Foucart, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero-Rivas, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gort, Bernharda Lottie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Albert</creatorcontrib><title>Discourse comprehension in L2: Making sense of what is not explicitly said</title><title>Brain and language</title><addtitle>Brain Lang</addtitle><description>•L2 speakers integrate multiple sources of information during discourse comprehension.•Processes involved in L1 and L2 discourse comprehension are similar.•L2 speakers can make causal inferences online.•L2 discourse processing is incremental.
Using ERPs, we tested whether L2 speakers can integrate multiple sources of information (e.g., semantic, pragmatic information) during discourse comprehension. We presented native speakers and L2 speakers with three-sentence scenarios in which the final sentence was highly causally related, intermediately related, or causally unrelated to its context; its interpretation therefore required simple or complex inferences. Native speakers revealed a gradual N400-like effect, larger in the causally unrelated condition than in the highly related condition, and falling in-between in the intermediately related condition, replicating previous results. In the crucial intermediately related condition, L2 speakers behaved like native speakers, however, showing extra processing in a later time-window. Overall, the results show that, when reading, L2 speakers are able to process information from the local context and prior information (e.g., world knowledge) to build global coherence, suggesting that they process different sources of information to make inferences online during discourse comprehension, like native speakers.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bilingualism</subject><subject>Causal inferences</subject><subject>Coherence</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Comprehension - physiology</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Discourse comprehension</subject><subject>ERPs</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pragmatics</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Second language learning</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Speech Perception - physiology</subject><issn>0093-934X</issn><issn>1090-2155</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoO4uOPqLxAk4MVL96by0ekIHmT92mXEi4K3kE5Xuxl7OrNJt7r_3owzKngQDyFUeN5K1fsS8ghYDQya803duakfa16KmpmaMbhDVsAMqzgodZesGDOiMkJ-OiX3c94UAGQL98gp100jtTYrcvUyZB-XlJH6uN0lvMYphzjRMNE1f0bfuS9h-kxzeUUaB_rt2s00ZDrFmeL33Rh8mMdbml3oH5CTwY0ZHx7vM_Lx9asPF2-r9fs3lxcv1pVXTM-V4UoZcEOjuMG2190wSAnQYddy1QvNuDNDP3RK9Ay1wA461QrBDAwNEwDijMChr8-Ltwk9Ju9mG134U-wPZ5pbIYDptmieHjS7FG8WzLPdlr1xHN2EcckW2jKblqDgP1ApDIDWTUGf_IVuipVTWb5Q2hgpWy4LJY7zpphzwsHuUti6dGuB2X2SdmN_Jmn3SVpmbAmqqB4fey_dFvvfml_RFeD5AcDi9deAyWYfcPLYh2LDbPsY_vnBD2yvrSI</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Foucart, Alice</creator><creator>Romero-Rivas, Carlos</creator><creator>Gort, Bernharda Lottie</creator><creator>Costa, Albert</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Academic Press</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>XX2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Discourse comprehension in L2: Making sense of what is not explicitly said</title><author>Foucart, Alice ; Romero-Rivas, Carlos ; Gort, Bernharda Lottie ; Costa, Albert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-925591af6529e8d7bff4411beb825d3702a9fdfb53d0e73eb1b5833091f603113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bilingualism</topic><topic>Causal inferences</topic><topic>Coherence</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Comprehension - physiology</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Discourse comprehension</topic><topic>ERPs</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pragmatics</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Second language learning</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Speech Perception - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Foucart, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero-Rivas, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gort, Bernharda Lottie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Albert</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Recercat</collection><jtitle>Brain and language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Foucart, Alice</au><au>Romero-Rivas, Carlos</au><au>Gort, Bernharda Lottie</au><au>Costa, Albert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discourse comprehension in L2: Making sense of what is not explicitly said</atitle><jtitle>Brain and language</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Lang</addtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>163</volume><spage>32</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>32-41</pages><issn>0093-934X</issn><eissn>1090-2155</eissn><abstract>•L2 speakers integrate multiple sources of information during discourse comprehension.•Processes involved in L1 and L2 discourse comprehension are similar.•L2 speakers can make causal inferences online.•L2 discourse processing is incremental.
Using ERPs, we tested whether L2 speakers can integrate multiple sources of information (e.g., semantic, pragmatic information) during discourse comprehension. We presented native speakers and L2 speakers with three-sentence scenarios in which the final sentence was highly causally related, intermediately related, or causally unrelated to its context; its interpretation therefore required simple or complex inferences. Native speakers revealed a gradual N400-like effect, larger in the causally unrelated condition than in the highly related condition, and falling in-between in the intermediately related condition, replicating previous results. In the crucial intermediately related condition, L2 speakers behaved like native speakers, however, showing extra processing in a later time-window. Overall, the results show that, when reading, L2 speakers are able to process information from the local context and prior information (e.g., world knowledge) to build global coherence, suggesting that they process different sources of information to make inferences online during discourse comprehension, like native speakers.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27664779</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bandl.2016.09.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0093-934X |
ispartof | Brain and language, 2016-12, Vol.163, p.32-41 |
issn | 0093-934X 1090-2155 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_csuc_recercat_oai_recercat_cat_2072_331078 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) |
subjects | Adult Bilingualism Causal inferences Coherence Comprehension Comprehension - physiology Context Discourse comprehension ERPs Evoked Potentials Female Humans Male Pragmatics Reading Second language learning Semantics Speech Perception - physiology |
title | Discourse comprehension in L2: Making sense of what is not explicitly said |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T20%3A04%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_csuc_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discourse%20comprehension%20in%20L2:%20Making%20sense%20of%20what%20is%20not%20explicitly%20said&rft.jtitle=Brain%20and%20language&rft.au=Foucart,%20Alice&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=163&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=32-41&rft.issn=0093-934X&rft.eissn=1090-2155&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.09.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_csuc_%3E0001224634%3C/proquest_csuc_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-925591af6529e8d7bff4411beb825d3702a9fdfb53d0e73eb1b5833091f603113%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1879944824&rft_id=info:pmid/27664779&rfr_iscdi=true |