Loading…

Discourse comprehension in L2: Making sense of what is not explicitly said

•L2 speakers integrate multiple sources of information during discourse comprehension.•Processes involved in L1 and L2 discourse comprehension are similar.•L2 speakers can make causal inferences online.•L2 discourse processing is incremental. Using ERPs, we tested whether L2 speakers can integrate m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brain and language 2016-12, Vol.163, p.32-41
Main Authors: Foucart, Alice, Romero-Rivas, Carlos, Gort, Bernharda Lottie, Costa, Albert
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-925591af6529e8d7bff4411beb825d3702a9fdfb53d0e73eb1b5833091f603113
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-925591af6529e8d7bff4411beb825d3702a9fdfb53d0e73eb1b5833091f603113
container_end_page 41
container_issue
container_start_page 32
container_title Brain and language
container_volume 163
creator Foucart, Alice
Romero-Rivas, Carlos
Gort, Bernharda Lottie
Costa, Albert
description •L2 speakers integrate multiple sources of information during discourse comprehension.•Processes involved in L1 and L2 discourse comprehension are similar.•L2 speakers can make causal inferences online.•L2 discourse processing is incremental. Using ERPs, we tested whether L2 speakers can integrate multiple sources of information (e.g., semantic, pragmatic information) during discourse comprehension. We presented native speakers and L2 speakers with three-sentence scenarios in which the final sentence was highly causally related, intermediately related, or causally unrelated to its context; its interpretation therefore required simple or complex inferences. Native speakers revealed a gradual N400-like effect, larger in the causally unrelated condition than in the highly related condition, and falling in-between in the intermediately related condition, replicating previous results. In the crucial intermediately related condition, L2 speakers behaved like native speakers, however, showing extra processing in a later time-window. Overall, the results show that, when reading, L2 speakers are able to process information from the local context and prior information (e.g., world knowledge) to build global coherence, suggesting that they process different sources of information to make inferences online during discourse comprehension, like native speakers.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.09.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_csuc_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_csuc_recercat_oai_recercat_cat_2072_331078</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0093934X16300827</els_id><sourcerecordid>0001224634</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-925591af6529e8d7bff4411beb825d3702a9fdfb53d0e73eb1b5833091f603113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoO4uOPqLxAk4MVL96by0ekIHmT92mXEi4K3kE5Xuxl7OrNJt7r_3owzKngQDyFUeN5K1fsS8ghYDQya803duakfa16KmpmaMbhDVsAMqzgodZesGDOiMkJ-OiX3c94UAGQL98gp100jtTYrcvUyZB-XlJH6uN0lvMYphzjRMNE1f0bfuS9h-kxzeUUaB_rt2s00ZDrFmeL33Rh8mMdbml3oH5CTwY0ZHx7vM_Lx9asPF2-r9fs3lxcv1pVXTM-V4UoZcEOjuMG2190wSAnQYddy1QvNuDNDP3RK9Ay1wA461QrBDAwNEwDijMChr8-Ltwk9Ju9mG134U-wPZ5pbIYDptmieHjS7FG8WzLPdlr1xHN2EcckW2jKblqDgP1ApDIDWTUGf_IVuipVTWb5Q2hgpWy4LJY7zpphzwsHuUti6dGuB2X2SdmN_Jmn3SVpmbAmqqB4fey_dFvvfml_RFeD5AcDi9deAyWYfcPLYh2LDbPsY_vnBD2yvrSI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1879944824</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discourse comprehension in L2: Making sense of what is not explicitly said</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Foucart, Alice ; Romero-Rivas, Carlos ; Gort, Bernharda Lottie ; Costa, Albert</creator><creatorcontrib>Foucart, Alice ; Romero-Rivas, Carlos ; Gort, Bernharda Lottie ; Costa, Albert</creatorcontrib><description>•L2 speakers integrate multiple sources of information during discourse comprehension.•Processes involved in L1 and L2 discourse comprehension are similar.•L2 speakers can make causal inferences online.•L2 discourse processing is incremental. Using ERPs, we tested whether L2 speakers can integrate multiple sources of information (e.g., semantic, pragmatic information) during discourse comprehension. We presented native speakers and L2 speakers with three-sentence scenarios in which the final sentence was highly causally related, intermediately related, or causally unrelated to its context; its interpretation therefore required simple or complex inferences. Native speakers revealed a gradual N400-like effect, larger in the causally unrelated condition than in the highly related condition, and falling in-between in the intermediately related condition, replicating previous results. In the crucial intermediately related condition, L2 speakers behaved like native speakers, however, showing extra processing in a later time-window. Overall, the results show that, when reading, L2 speakers are able to process information from the local context and prior information (e.g., world knowledge) to build global coherence, suggesting that they process different sources of information to make inferences online during discourse comprehension, like native speakers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-934X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2155</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.09.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27664779</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bilingualism ; Causal inferences ; Coherence ; Comprehension ; Comprehension - physiology ; Context ; Discourse comprehension ; ERPs ; Evoked Potentials ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Pragmatics ; Reading ; Second language learning ; Semantics ; Speech Perception - physiology</subject><ispartof>Brain and language, 2016-12, Vol.163, p.32-41</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Dec 2016</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess © Elsevier &lt;a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.09.001"&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.09.001&lt;/a&gt;</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-925591af6529e8d7bff4411beb825d3702a9fdfb53d0e73eb1b5833091f603113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-925591af6529e8d7bff4411beb825d3702a9fdfb53d0e73eb1b5833091f603113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27922,27923,31267</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27664779$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Foucart, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero-Rivas, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gort, Bernharda Lottie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Albert</creatorcontrib><title>Discourse comprehension in L2: Making sense of what is not explicitly said</title><title>Brain and language</title><addtitle>Brain Lang</addtitle><description>•L2 speakers integrate multiple sources of information during discourse comprehension.•Processes involved in L1 and L2 discourse comprehension are similar.•L2 speakers can make causal inferences online.•L2 discourse processing is incremental. Using ERPs, we tested whether L2 speakers can integrate multiple sources of information (e.g., semantic, pragmatic information) during discourse comprehension. We presented native speakers and L2 speakers with three-sentence scenarios in which the final sentence was highly causally related, intermediately related, or causally unrelated to its context; its interpretation therefore required simple or complex inferences. Native speakers revealed a gradual N400-like effect, larger in the causally unrelated condition than in the highly related condition, and falling in-between in the intermediately related condition, replicating previous results. In the crucial intermediately related condition, L2 speakers behaved like native speakers, however, showing extra processing in a later time-window. Overall, the results show that, when reading, L2 speakers are able to process information from the local context and prior information (e.g., world knowledge) to build global coherence, suggesting that they process different sources of information to make inferences online during discourse comprehension, like native speakers.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bilingualism</subject><subject>Causal inferences</subject><subject>Coherence</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Comprehension - physiology</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Discourse comprehension</subject><subject>ERPs</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pragmatics</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Second language learning</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Speech Perception - physiology</subject><issn>0093-934X</issn><issn>1090-2155</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoO4uOPqLxAk4MVL96by0ekIHmT92mXEi4K3kE5Xuxl7OrNJt7r_3owzKngQDyFUeN5K1fsS8ghYDQya803duakfa16KmpmaMbhDVsAMqzgodZesGDOiMkJ-OiX3c94UAGQL98gp100jtTYrcvUyZB-XlJH6uN0lvMYphzjRMNE1f0bfuS9h-kxzeUUaB_rt2s00ZDrFmeL33Rh8mMdbml3oH5CTwY0ZHx7vM_Lx9asPF2-r9fs3lxcv1pVXTM-V4UoZcEOjuMG2190wSAnQYddy1QvNuDNDP3RK9Ay1wA461QrBDAwNEwDijMChr8-Ltwk9Ju9mG134U-wPZ5pbIYDptmieHjS7FG8WzLPdlr1xHN2EcckW2jKblqDgP1ApDIDWTUGf_IVuipVTWb5Q2hgpWy4LJY7zpphzwsHuUti6dGuB2X2SdmN_Jmn3SVpmbAmqqB4fey_dFvvfml_RFeD5AcDi9deAyWYfcPLYh2LDbPsY_vnBD2yvrSI</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Foucart, Alice</creator><creator>Romero-Rivas, Carlos</creator><creator>Gort, Bernharda Lottie</creator><creator>Costa, Albert</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Academic Press</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>XX2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Discourse comprehension in L2: Making sense of what is not explicitly said</title><author>Foucart, Alice ; Romero-Rivas, Carlos ; Gort, Bernharda Lottie ; Costa, Albert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-925591af6529e8d7bff4411beb825d3702a9fdfb53d0e73eb1b5833091f603113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bilingualism</topic><topic>Causal inferences</topic><topic>Coherence</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Comprehension - physiology</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Discourse comprehension</topic><topic>ERPs</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pragmatics</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Second language learning</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Speech Perception - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Foucart, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero-Rivas, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gort, Bernharda Lottie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Albert</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Recercat</collection><jtitle>Brain and language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Foucart, Alice</au><au>Romero-Rivas, Carlos</au><au>Gort, Bernharda Lottie</au><au>Costa, Albert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discourse comprehension in L2: Making sense of what is not explicitly said</atitle><jtitle>Brain and language</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Lang</addtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>163</volume><spage>32</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>32-41</pages><issn>0093-934X</issn><eissn>1090-2155</eissn><abstract>•L2 speakers integrate multiple sources of information during discourse comprehension.•Processes involved in L1 and L2 discourse comprehension are similar.•L2 speakers can make causal inferences online.•L2 discourse processing is incremental. Using ERPs, we tested whether L2 speakers can integrate multiple sources of information (e.g., semantic, pragmatic information) during discourse comprehension. We presented native speakers and L2 speakers with three-sentence scenarios in which the final sentence was highly causally related, intermediately related, or causally unrelated to its context; its interpretation therefore required simple or complex inferences. Native speakers revealed a gradual N400-like effect, larger in the causally unrelated condition than in the highly related condition, and falling in-between in the intermediately related condition, replicating previous results. In the crucial intermediately related condition, L2 speakers behaved like native speakers, however, showing extra processing in a later time-window. Overall, the results show that, when reading, L2 speakers are able to process information from the local context and prior information (e.g., world knowledge) to build global coherence, suggesting that they process different sources of information to make inferences online during discourse comprehension, like native speakers.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27664779</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bandl.2016.09.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0093-934X
ispartof Brain and language, 2016-12, Vol.163, p.32-41
issn 0093-934X
1090-2155
language eng
recordid cdi_csuc_recercat_oai_recercat_cat_2072_331078
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects Adult
Bilingualism
Causal inferences
Coherence
Comprehension
Comprehension - physiology
Context
Discourse comprehension
ERPs
Evoked Potentials
Female
Humans
Male
Pragmatics
Reading
Second language learning
Semantics
Speech Perception - physiology
title Discourse comprehension in L2: Making sense of what is not explicitly said
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T20%3A04%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_csuc_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discourse%20comprehension%20in%20L2:%20Making%20sense%20of%20what%20is%20not%20explicitly%20said&rft.jtitle=Brain%20and%20language&rft.au=Foucart,%20Alice&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=163&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=32-41&rft.issn=0093-934X&rft.eissn=1090-2155&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.09.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_csuc_%3E0001224634%3C/proquest_csuc_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-925591af6529e8d7bff4411beb825d3702a9fdfb53d0e73eb1b5833091f603113%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1879944824&rft_id=info:pmid/27664779&rfr_iscdi=true