Loading…

Red filter meibography by smartphones in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction: a validity and reliability study

ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to determine the validity and reliability of the red filter meibography by smartphone compared with infrared in assessing meibomian gland drop-out.Methods and analysisAn analytical cross-sectional study was done with a total of 35 subjects (68 eyes) with suspe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMJ open ophthalmology 2024-04, Vol.9 (1), p.e001266
Main Authors: Anissa, Gisela Haza, La Distia Nora, Rina, Widyawati, Syska, Sitompul, Ratna, Yusuf, Prasandhya Astagiri, Kekalih, Aria
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to determine the validity and reliability of the red filter meibography by smartphone compared with infrared in assessing meibomian gland drop-out.Methods and analysisAn analytical cross-sectional study was done with a total of 35 subjects (68 eyes) with suspected MGD based on symptoms and lid morphological abnormalities. Meibomian glands were photographed using two smartphones (Samsung S9 and iPhone XR) on a slit-lamp with added red filter. Images were assessed subjectively using meiboscore by the two raters and drop-out percentages were assessed by ImageJ.ResultsThere was no agreement in meiboscore and a minimal level of agreement in drop-out percentages between red filter meibography and infrared. Inter-rater reliability showed no agreement between two raters. Intra-rater reliability demonstrated weak agreement in rater 1 and no agreement in rater 2.ConclusionValidity of the red filter meibography technique by smartphones is not yet satisfactory in evaluating drop-out. Further improvement on qualities of images must be done and research on subjective assessment was deemed necessary due to poor results of intrarater and inter-rater reliability.
ISSN:2397-3269
2397-3269
DOI:10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001266