Can we still comply with the maximum limit of 2 °C? Approaches to a New Climate Contract

The international climate policy is in trouble. CO2 emissions are rising instead of shrinking. The 2025 climate summit in Paris should lead to a global agreement, but what should be its design? In an earlier paper in Cadmus on the issue, the author outlined a contract formula based on the so-called...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cadmus (Trieste, Italy) Italy), 2014-10, Vol.2 (3), p.152-161
Main Author: Radermacher, F J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Carbon
Climate change
Emissions trading
Industrialized nations
Neutrality
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 161
container_issue 3
container_start_page 152
container_title Cadmus (Trieste, Italy)
container_volume 2
creator Radermacher, F J
description The international climate policy is in trouble. CO2 emissions are rising instead of shrinking. The 2025 climate summit in Paris should lead to a global agreement, but what should be its design? In an earlier paper in Cadmus on the issue, the author outlined a contract formula based on the so-called 'Copenhagen Accord' that is based on a dynamic cap and an intelligent burden sharing between politics and the private sector. The private sector was brought into the deal via the idea of a voluntary climate neutrality of private emissions culminating in a 'Global Neutral'promoted by the United Nations. All this was based on a global capand-trade system. For a number of reasons, it may be that a global cap-and-trade system cannot or will not be established. States may use other instruments to fulfil their promises. The present paper elaborates that even under such conditions, the basic proposal can still be implemented. This may prove useful for the Paris negotiations.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0d650e3bd7c94b4181026aeed21c8210</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0d650e3bd7c94b4181026aeed21c8210</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3505691441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d942-4b5e2044c99f21cc4e0a51ec6a1cca00dbbd63cd0429ef55986a8f16ec651e223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1qwzAQhU1poSHNHQa6NkiypNirEkx_AqXdZNOVGUvjRsGOXFkhza16hp6soildzQ8f772Zi2wmWFHmSih2-d9LcZ0tpsm1TGhVKVWwWfZW4x6OBFN0fQ_GD2N_gqOLW4hbggE_3XAYoHeDi-A7EPD9Vd_BahyDR7OlCaIHhBc6Qp0gjAS138eAJt5kVx32Ey3-6jzbPNxv6qf8-fVxXa-ec1tJkctWkWBSmqrqBDdGEkPFyWhMAzJm29bqwlgmRUWdUlWpsey4TkTChCjm2fosaz3umjGkEOHUeHTN78KH9wZDdKanhlmtGBWtXZpKtpKXPD0CiWwyLgVnSev2rJWu-zjQFJudP4R9St9wLZa8KJbJ8QfoVWes</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1627133722</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can we still comply with the maximum limit of 2 °C? Approaches to a New Climate Contract</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Radermacher, F J</creator><creatorcontrib>Radermacher, F J</creatorcontrib><description>The international climate policy is in trouble. CO2 emissions are rising instead of shrinking. The 2025 climate summit in Paris should lead to a global agreement, but what should be its design? In an earlier paper in Cadmus on the issue, the author outlined a contract formula based on the so-called 'Copenhagen Accord' that is based on a dynamic cap and an intelligent burden sharing between politics and the private sector. The private sector was brought into the deal via the idea of a voluntary climate neutrality of private emissions culminating in a 'Global Neutral'promoted by the United Nations. All this was based on a global capand-trade system. For a number of reasons, it may be that a global cap-and-trade system cannot or will not be established. States may use other instruments to fulfil their promises. The present paper elaborates that even under such conditions, the basic proposal can still be implemented. This may prove useful for the Paris negotiations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2038-5242</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2038-5250</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Trieste: The Risk Institute</publisher><subject>Carbon ; Climate change ; Emissions trading ; Industrialized nations ; Neutrality</subject><ispartof>Cadmus (Trieste, Italy), 2014-10, Vol.2 (3), p.152-161</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Risk Institute Oct 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1627133722/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1627133722?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21374,25732,33590,36991,43712,44569,73967,74872</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Radermacher, F J</creatorcontrib><title>Can we still comply with the maximum limit of 2 °C? Approaches to a New Climate Contract</title><title>Cadmus (Trieste, Italy)</title><description>The international climate policy is in trouble. CO2 emissions are rising instead of shrinking. The 2025 climate summit in Paris should lead to a global agreement, but what should be its design? In an earlier paper in Cadmus on the issue, the author outlined a contract formula based on the so-called 'Copenhagen Accord' that is based on a dynamic cap and an intelligent burden sharing between politics and the private sector. The private sector was brought into the deal via the idea of a voluntary climate neutrality of private emissions culminating in a 'Global Neutral'promoted by the United Nations. All this was based on a global capand-trade system. For a number of reasons, it may be that a global cap-and-trade system cannot or will not be established. States may use other instruments to fulfil their promises. The present paper elaborates that even under such conditions, the basic proposal can still be implemented. This may prove useful for the Paris negotiations.</description><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Emissions trading</subject><subject>Industrialized nations</subject><subject>Neutrality</subject><issn>2038-5242</issn><issn>2038-5250</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1qwzAQhU1poSHNHQa6NkiypNirEkx_AqXdZNOVGUvjRsGOXFkhza16hp6soildzQ8f772Zi2wmWFHmSih2-d9LcZ0tpsm1TGhVKVWwWfZW4x6OBFN0fQ_GD2N_gqOLW4hbggE_3XAYoHeDi-A7EPD9Vd_BahyDR7OlCaIHhBc6Qp0gjAS138eAJt5kVx32Ey3-6jzbPNxv6qf8-fVxXa-ec1tJkctWkWBSmqrqBDdGEkPFyWhMAzJm29bqwlgmRUWdUlWpsey4TkTChCjm2fosaz3umjGkEOHUeHTN78KH9wZDdKanhlmtGBWtXZpKtpKXPD0CiWwyLgVnSev2rJWu-zjQFJudP4R9St9wLZa8KJbJ8QfoVWes</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Radermacher, F J</creator><general>The Risk Institute</general><general>Risk Institute, Trieste- Geneva</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Can we still comply with the maximum limit of 2 °C? Approaches to a New Climate Contract</title><author>Radermacher, F J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d942-4b5e2044c99f21cc4e0a51ec6a1cca00dbbd63cd0429ef55986a8f16ec651e223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Emissions trading</topic><topic>Industrialized nations</topic><topic>Neutrality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Radermacher, F J</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Cadmus (Trieste, Italy)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Radermacher, F J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can we still comply with the maximum limit of 2 °C? Approaches to a New Climate Contract</atitle><jtitle>Cadmus (Trieste, Italy)</jtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>152</spage><epage>161</epage><pages>152-161</pages><issn>2038-5242</issn><eissn>2038-5250</eissn><abstract>The international climate policy is in trouble. CO2 emissions are rising instead of shrinking. The 2025 climate summit in Paris should lead to a global agreement, but what should be its design? In an earlier paper in Cadmus on the issue, the author outlined a contract formula based on the so-called 'Copenhagen Accord' that is based on a dynamic cap and an intelligent burden sharing between politics and the private sector. The private sector was brought into the deal via the idea of a voluntary climate neutrality of private emissions culminating in a 'Global Neutral'promoted by the United Nations. All this was based on a global capand-trade system. For a number of reasons, it may be that a global cap-and-trade system cannot or will not be established. States may use other instruments to fulfil their promises. The present paper elaborates that even under such conditions, the basic proposal can still be implemented. This may prove useful for the Paris negotiations.</abstract><cop>Trieste</cop><pub>The Risk Institute</pub><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2038-5242
ispartof Cadmus (Trieste, Italy), 2014-10, Vol.2 (3), p.152-161
issn 2038-5242
2038-5250
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_0d650e3bd7c94b4181026aeed21c8210
source Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Carbon
Climate change
Emissions trading
Industrialized nations
Neutrality
title Can we still comply with the maximum limit of 2 °C? Approaches to a New Climate Contract
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T01%3A36%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20we%20still%20comply%20with%20the%20maximum%20limit%20of%202%20%C2%B0C?%20Approaches%20to%20a%20New%20Climate%20Contract&rft.jtitle=Cadmus%20(Trieste,%20Italy)&rft.au=Radermacher,%20F%20J&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=152&rft.epage=161&rft.pages=152-161&rft.issn=2038-5242&rft.eissn=2038-5250&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3505691441%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d942-4b5e2044c99f21cc4e0a51ec6a1cca00dbbd63cd0429ef55986a8f16ec651e223%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1627133722&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true