Loading…
Establishing a Field of Collaboration for Engineers, Scientists, and Community Groups: Incentives, Barriers, and Potential
With the aim of mobilizing engineers and scientists to address environmental, climate, and energy justice challenges in the United States, this study examines how engineers and scientists view their incentives, barriers, and potential for community‐based collaborations. Through a purposive convenien...
Saved in:
Published in: | Earth's future 2020-10, Vol.8 (10), p.n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | With the aim of mobilizing engineers and scientists to address environmental, climate, and energy justice challenges in the United States, this study examines how engineers and scientists view their incentives, barriers, and potential for community‐based collaborations. Through a purposive convenience sample (n = 281) and an online questionnaire, we investigate the attitudes and experiences of engineers and scientists regarding their community‐based work. Our analyses reveal dynamics of race, class, and experience, suggesting a type of socio‐demographic conditioning informing community‐based collaborations. Engineers and scientists also identify four main barriers to community‐based work: lack of time, lack of funding, lack of rapport, and knowledge deficits. In response, we introduce a field of collaboration with its own set of capitals—economic, cultural, social, and symbolic—and offer recommendations on how engineers, scientists, and community groups might collaborate with each other to address longstanding issues of energy, climate, and environmental injustice in the United States.
Key Points
From a sample of n = 281, we examine how engineers/scientists view incentives, barriers, and potential for community‐based collaborations
We find relations of race, class, and experience that suggests that sociodemographic conditioning informs community‐based collaborations
Four barriers to community collaborations are identified: lack of time, lack of funding, lack of rapport, and knowledge deficits |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2328-4277 2328-4277 |
DOI: | 10.1029/2020EF001624 |