What is “good” co-production in the context of planetary health research, and how is it enabled?

Involvement of non-academic stakeholders in research is essential when seeking to address global challenges, yet there is considerable uncertainty on how to do this well given the complexity. This paper aims to define more clearly what ‘good’ co-production looks like in the context of urban-planetar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Earth system governance 2025-01, Vol.23, p.100229, Article 100229
Main Authors: Black, Daniel, Bates, Geoff, Gibson, Andy, Pain, Kathy, Rosenberg, Ges, White, Jo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Co-creation
Co-design
Co-production
Collaboration
Planetary health
Stakeholder analysis
Urban development
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Involvement of non-academic stakeholders in research is essential when seeking to address global challenges, yet there is considerable uncertainty on how to do this well given the complexity. This paper aims to define more clearly what ‘good’ co-production looks like in the context of urban-planetary health research and how to operationalise it in research design, drawing on existing literature alongside case study experience from operationalising a major research programme. The first sections of the paper set out the rationale, and analyses key issues identified relating to co-production. The case study analysis is based on six headline themes: clarity of mission, language, societal impact, complexity, new approaches and limitations. Eight principles are presented alongside associated questions for research teams. Logic model development and co-production activities are plotted along the ten-year research trajectory, which reveals five key decision points and potential opportunities for optimising mission-oriented co-production in research design.
ISSN:2589-8116
2589-8116
DOI:10.1016/j.esg.2024.100229