Screening eaves of houses reduces indoor mosquito density in rural, western Kenya

• Published in: Malaria journal 2022-12, Vol.21 (1), p.377-377, Article 377
• Main Authors: Abong'o, Bernard, Gimnig, John E, Omoke, Diana, Ochomo, Eric, Walker, Edward D
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Anopheles; Anopheles funestus; Anopheles gambiae; Aquatic insects; Cement; Collections; Cooking; Culex; Culicidae; Disease transmission; Eave screening; Female; Health aspects; Households; Houses; Housing; Human diseases; Humans; Indoor environments; Insecticides; Kenya; Malaria; Malaria - prevention & control; Management; Mosquito Control - methods; Mosquito Vectors; Mosquitoes; Policies; Prevention; Residential areas; Roofing; Sampling; Species identification; Timber; Uptake; Vector-borne diseases
• ISSN: 1475-2875; 1475-2875
• DOI: 10.1186/s12936-022-04397-y

Despite the scale-up of insecticide-treated nets and indoor residual spraying, the bulk of malaria transmission in western Kenya still occurs indoors, late at night. House improvement is a potential long-term solution to further reduce malaria transmission in the region. The impact of eave screening on mosquito densities was evaluated in two rural villages in western Kenya. One-hundred-and-twenty pairs of structurally similar, neighbouring houses were used in the study. In each pair, one house was randomly selected to receive eave screening at the beginning of the study while the other remained unscreened until the end of the sampling period. Mosquito sampling was performed monthly by motorized aspiration method for 4 months. The collected mosquitoes were analysed for species identification. Compared to unscreened houses, significantly fewer female Anopheles funestus (RR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.29-0.55), Anopheles gambiae Complex (RR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.34-0.62) and Culex species (RR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.45-0.61) were collected in screened houses. No significant differences in the densities of the mosquitoes were detected in outdoor collections. Significantly fewer Anopheles funestus were collected indoors from houses with painted walls (RR = 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.38) while cooking in the house was associated with significantly lower numbers of Anopheles gambiae Complex indoors (RR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.45-0.79). Nearly all house owners (99.6%) wanted their houses permanently screened, including 97.7% that indicated a willingness to use their own resources. However, 99.2% required training on house screening. The cost of screening a single house was estimated at KES6,162.38 (US$61.62). Simple house modification by eave screening has the potential to reduce the indoor occurrence of both Anopheles and Culex mosquito species. Community acceptance was very high although education and mobilization may be needed for community uptake of house modification for vector control. Intersectoral collaboration and favourable government policies on housing are important links towards the adoption of house improvements for malaria control.