Loading…

Weekly taxane-anthracycline combination regimen versus tri-weekly anthracycline-based regimen for the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer:a randomized controlled trial

Background:Extensive studies have confirmed the efficacy of taxanes in combination with anthracycline-based chemotherapy on breast cancer.However,few studies have assessed the efficacy of weekly taxane-anthracycline regimens on locally advanced breast cancer.This study was to compare the efficacy an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ai zheng 2017-03, Vol.36 (6), p.274-281, Article 27
Main Authors: Tan, Qiu‐Wen, Luo, Ting, Zheng, Hong, Tian, Ting‐Lun, He, Ping, Chen, Jie, Zeng, He‐Lin, Lv, Qing
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background:Extensive studies have confirmed the efficacy of taxanes in combination with anthracycline-based chemotherapy on breast cancer.However,few studies have assessed the efficacy of weekly taxane-anthracycline regimens on locally advanced breast cancer.This study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a weekly taxaneanthracycline regimen with those of tri-weekly anthracycline-based regimen in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.Methods:Patients with locally advanced breast cancer were randomized to receive 4-6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with tri-weekly 5-fluorouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide(FEC) regimen or weekly paclitaxel-epirubicin(PE) regimen.The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response(pCR) rate.Other endpoints included the clinical tumor response,breast-conserving surgery rate,and adverse events.Results:Between March 2010 and September 2013,293 patients were randomized to the FEC(n=151) and PE(n=142) arms.The overall clinical response rate was significantly higher in the PE arm than in the FEC arm(76.06%vs.59.95%,P=0.001).Consistently,the post-chemotherapy pathologic T and N stages were significantly lower in the PE arm than in the FEC arm(P〈0.001).However,the pCR rate was similar in the two arms(10.61%vs.12.31%,P=0.665).Overall,36(27.27%) patients in the FEC arm and 6(35.28%) in the PE arm were qualified for breast-conserving surgery.Most adverse events were comparable in both arms,with more severe neutropenia in the PE arm than in the FEC arm(11.97%vs.5.96%,P=0.031).Conclusions:In patients with locally advanced breast cancer,weekly PE was not superior to FEC in terms of pCR.However,weekly PE has a higher response rate and superior down-staging effects.On this account,the PE regimen may be considered an alternative option for locally advanced breast cancer.Long-term follow-up data are needed to confirm the efficacy of this regimen on locally advanced breast cancer.Trial registration Chinese clinical trial registry,ChiCTR-TRC-10001043,September 21,2014
ISSN:1000-467X
2523-3548
1944-446X
1944-446X
2523-3548
DOI:10.1186/s40880-017-0196-5