Loading…

Towards the best constant in front of the Ditzian-Totik modulus of smoothness

We give accurate estimates for the constants K ( A ( I ) , n , x ) = sup f ∈ A ( I ) | L n f ( x ) − f ( x ) | ω σ 2 ( f ; 1 / n ) , x ∈ I , n = 1 , 2 , … , where I = R or I = [ 0 , ∞ ) , L n is a positive linear operator acting on real functions f defined on the interval I , A ( I ) is a certain su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of inequalities and applications 2016-05, Vol.2016 (1), p.1-17, Article 137
Main Authors: Adell, José A, Lekuona, Alberto
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We give accurate estimates for the constants K ( A ( I ) , n , x ) = sup f ∈ A ( I ) | L n f ( x ) − f ( x ) | ω σ 2 ( f ; 1 / n ) , x ∈ I , n = 1 , 2 , … , where I = R or I = [ 0 , ∞ ) , L n is a positive linear operator acting on real functions f defined on the interval I , A ( I ) is a certain subset of such function, and ω σ 2 ( f ; ⋅ ) is the Ditzian-Totik modulus of smoothness of f with weight function σ . This is done under the assumption that σ is concave and satisfies some simple boundary conditions at the endpoint of I , if any. Two illustrative examples closely connected are discussed, namely, Weierstrass and Szàsz-Mirakyan operators. In the first case, which involves the usual second modulus, we obtain the exact constants when A ( R ) is the set of convex functions or a suitable set of continuous piecewise linear functions.
ISSN:1029-242X
1025-5834
1029-242X
DOI:10.1186/s13660-016-1078-0