Improving uptake of colorectal cancer screening by complex patients at an academic primary care practice: a feasibility study

• Published in: BMJ open quality 2024-08, Vol.13 (3), p.e002844
• Main Authors: Desponds, Charlotte, Ducros, Cyril, Rochat, Carine, Galassini, Laure, Bodenmann, Patrick, Grazioli, Veronique S, Plys, Ekaterina, von Plessen, Christian, Gouveia, Alexandre, Selby, Kevin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; CANCER; Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis; Comorbidity; Complex patients; Complexity; Dementia; Early Detection of Cancer - methods; Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data; Family physicians; Feasibility Studies; Female; Humans; Intervention; Male; Mass Screening - methods; Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data; Medical screening; Mental disorders; Middle Aged; Participation; Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology; Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data; Patient Navigation - statistics & numerical data; Primary care; Primary Health Care - statistics & numerical data; Quality Improvement Report; Socioeconomic factors; Switzerland
• ISSN: 2399-6641; 2399-6641
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002844

BackgroundRegular screening reduces mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC). The Canton of Vaud, Switzerland, has a regional screening programme offering faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) or colonoscopy. Participation in the screening programme has been low, particularly among complex patients. Patient navigation has strong evidence for increasing the CRC screening rate.Design and objectiveThis feasibility study tested patient navigation performed by medical assistants for complex patients at an academic primary care practice.Baseline measurementsA review of 328 patients’ medical charts revealed that 51% were up-to-date with screening (16% within the programme), 24% were ineligible, 5% had a documented refusal and 20% were not up-to-date, of whom 58 (18%) were complex patients.Intervention (February 2023 to May 2023)We tried to help complex patients participate in the screening programme using either in-person or telephone patient navigation. Each intervention was piloted by a physician-researcher and then performed by a medical assistant. Based on the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance framework, we collected: Intervention participation and refusal, screening acceptance and completion and both patients and medical assistant acceptability (ie, qualitative interviews).ResultsOnly 4/58 (7%) patients participated in the in-person patient navigation test phase due to scheduling problems. All four patients accepted a prescription and 2/4 (50%) completed their test. We piloted a telephone intervention to bypass scheduling issues but all patients refused a telephone discussion with the medical assistant. At two months after the last intervention, the proportion of patients up-to-date increased from 51% to 56%.ConclusionOur overall approach was resource-intensive and had little impact on the overall participation rate. It was likely not sustainable. New approaches and reimbursement for a specific patient navigator role are needed to increase CRC screening of complex patients.