Loading…
EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs
Electric discharge machining (EDM) of tool steel (D2 grade) has been performed using different tool designs to produce through-holes. Machining performance has been gauged with reference to machining time, hole taper angle, overcut, and surface roughness. Inaccuracies and slow machining rate are con...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied sciences 2020-11, Vol.10 (21), p.7411 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-456c1b818b2aefd4510fc3be4de18dbd7c54fe9ffaca681b49f440862f9663bd3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-456c1b818b2aefd4510fc3be4de18dbd7c54fe9ffaca681b49f440862f9663bd3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 21 |
container_start_page | 7411 |
container_title | Applied sciences |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Rafaqat, Madiha Mufti, Nadeem Ahmad Ahmed, Naveed Alahmari, Abdulrahman M. Hussain, Amjad |
description | Electric discharge machining (EDM) of tool steel (D2 grade) has been performed using different tool designs to produce through-holes. Machining performance has been gauged with reference to machining time, hole taper angle, overcut, and surface roughness. Inaccuracies and slow machining rate are considered as the most common limitations of the electric discharge machining (die-sinking). Traditionally, a cylindrical tool is used to form circular holes through EDM. In this study, the hole formation is carried out by changing the tool design which is the novelty of the research. Two-stage experimentation was performed. The newly designed tools substantially outperformed a traditional cylindrical tool, especially in terms of machining time. The main reason for the better machining results of modified tools is the sparking area that differs from the traditional sparking. Comparing against the performance of a traditional cylindrical tool, the newly designed tools offer a considerable reduction in the machining time, radial overcut, and roughness of the inside surfaces of machined holes, amounting to be approximately 50%, 30.6%, and 38.7%, respectively. The drop in the machining time along with a condensed level of radial overcut and surface roughness can shrink the EDM limitations and make the process relatively faster with low machining inaccuracies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/app10217411 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1ebb06cf11004c97941ec7c2efd901f4</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1ebb06cf11004c97941ec7c2efd901f4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2534077343</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-456c1b818b2aefd4510fc3be4de18dbd7c54fe9ffaca681b49f440862f9663bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkFFLwzAUhYMoOHRP_oGAj1LNbdKk9U3WqYOJwvQ5pOnN6OyamnQP_ns7J7L7ci-Xj3MOh5ArYLecF-zO9D2wFJQAOCGTlCmZcAHq9Og-J9MYN2ycAngObEKW8_KFekfLlK4GxPaevmFwPmxNZ5HO_LY3oYm-2zN7tGyQrprus-nWdN6iHYKvkZYYm3UXL8mZM23E6d--IB-P8_fZc7J8fVrMHpaJ5VIMicikhSqHvEoNulpkwJzlFYoaIa-rWtlMOCycM9bIHCpROCFYLlNXSMmrml-QxUG39maj-9BsTfjW3jT69-HDWpswNLZFDVhVTFoHwJiwhSoEoFU2HX0LBk6MWtcHrT74rx3GQW_8LnRjfJ1mXDCluOAjdXOgbPAxBnT_rsD0vn191D7_AQ2ldS8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2534077343</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Rafaqat, Madiha ; Mufti, Nadeem Ahmad ; Ahmed, Naveed ; Alahmari, Abdulrahman M. ; Hussain, Amjad</creator><creatorcontrib>Rafaqat, Madiha ; Mufti, Nadeem Ahmad ; Ahmed, Naveed ; Alahmari, Abdulrahman M. ; Hussain, Amjad</creatorcontrib><description>Electric discharge machining (EDM) of tool steel (D2 grade) has been performed using different tool designs to produce through-holes. Machining performance has been gauged with reference to machining time, hole taper angle, overcut, and surface roughness. Inaccuracies and slow machining rate are considered as the most common limitations of the electric discharge machining (die-sinking). Traditionally, a cylindrical tool is used to form circular holes through EDM. In this study, the hole formation is carried out by changing the tool design which is the novelty of the research. Two-stage experimentation was performed. The newly designed tools substantially outperformed a traditional cylindrical tool, especially in terms of machining time. The main reason for the better machining results of modified tools is the sparking area that differs from the traditional sparking. Comparing against the performance of a traditional cylindrical tool, the newly designed tools offer a considerable reduction in the machining time, radial overcut, and roughness of the inside surfaces of machined holes, amounting to be approximately 50%, 30.6%, and 38.7%, respectively. The drop in the machining time along with a condensed level of radial overcut and surface roughness can shrink the EDM limitations and make the process relatively faster with low machining inaccuracies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2076-3417</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-3417</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/app10217411</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Aluminum ; D2 steel ; Design ; Die sinking ; Dies ; EDM ; EDM electrodes ; Electric discharge machining ; Electrodes ; Experimentation ; land thickness ; Machine shops ; machining time ; modified tools ; Optimization ; relief angle ; Steel ; Surface roughness ; Titanium alloys ; Tool steels</subject><ispartof>Applied sciences, 2020-11, Vol.10 (21), p.7411</ispartof><rights>2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-456c1b818b2aefd4510fc3be4de18dbd7c54fe9ffaca681b49f440862f9663bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-456c1b818b2aefd4510fc3be4de18dbd7c54fe9ffaca681b49f440862f9663bd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7752-7199</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2534077343/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2534077343?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rafaqat, Madiha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mufti, Nadeem Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Naveed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alahmari, Abdulrahman M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Amjad</creatorcontrib><title>EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs</title><title>Applied sciences</title><description>Electric discharge machining (EDM) of tool steel (D2 grade) has been performed using different tool designs to produce through-holes. Machining performance has been gauged with reference to machining time, hole taper angle, overcut, and surface roughness. Inaccuracies and slow machining rate are considered as the most common limitations of the electric discharge machining (die-sinking). Traditionally, a cylindrical tool is used to form circular holes through EDM. In this study, the hole formation is carried out by changing the tool design which is the novelty of the research. Two-stage experimentation was performed. The newly designed tools substantially outperformed a traditional cylindrical tool, especially in terms of machining time. The main reason for the better machining results of modified tools is the sparking area that differs from the traditional sparking. Comparing against the performance of a traditional cylindrical tool, the newly designed tools offer a considerable reduction in the machining time, radial overcut, and roughness of the inside surfaces of machined holes, amounting to be approximately 50%, 30.6%, and 38.7%, respectively. The drop in the machining time along with a condensed level of radial overcut and surface roughness can shrink the EDM limitations and make the process relatively faster with low machining inaccuracies.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>D2 steel</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Die sinking</subject><subject>Dies</subject><subject>EDM</subject><subject>EDM electrodes</subject><subject>Electric discharge machining</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>land thickness</subject><subject>Machine shops</subject><subject>machining time</subject><subject>modified tools</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>relief angle</subject><subject>Steel</subject><subject>Surface roughness</subject><subject>Titanium alloys</subject><subject>Tool steels</subject><issn>2076-3417</issn><issn>2076-3417</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkFFLwzAUhYMoOHRP_oGAj1LNbdKk9U3WqYOJwvQ5pOnN6OyamnQP_ns7J7L7ci-Xj3MOh5ArYLecF-zO9D2wFJQAOCGTlCmZcAHq9Og-J9MYN2ycAngObEKW8_KFekfLlK4GxPaevmFwPmxNZ5HO_LY3oYm-2zN7tGyQrprus-nWdN6iHYKvkZYYm3UXL8mZM23E6d--IB-P8_fZc7J8fVrMHpaJ5VIMicikhSqHvEoNulpkwJzlFYoaIa-rWtlMOCycM9bIHCpROCFYLlNXSMmrml-QxUG39maj-9BsTfjW3jT69-HDWpswNLZFDVhVTFoHwJiwhSoEoFU2HX0LBk6MWtcHrT74rx3GQW_8LnRjfJ1mXDCluOAjdXOgbPAxBnT_rsD0vn191D7_AQ2ldS8</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Rafaqat, Madiha</creator><creator>Mufti, Nadeem Ahmad</creator><creator>Ahmed, Naveed</creator><creator>Alahmari, Abdulrahman M.</creator><creator>Hussain, Amjad</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7752-7199</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs</title><author>Rafaqat, Madiha ; Mufti, Nadeem Ahmad ; Ahmed, Naveed ; Alahmari, Abdulrahman M. ; Hussain, Amjad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-456c1b818b2aefd4510fc3be4de18dbd7c54fe9ffaca681b49f440862f9663bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>D2 steel</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Die sinking</topic><topic>Dies</topic><topic>EDM</topic><topic>EDM electrodes</topic><topic>Electric discharge machining</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>land thickness</topic><topic>Machine shops</topic><topic>machining time</topic><topic>modified tools</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>relief angle</topic><topic>Steel</topic><topic>Surface roughness</topic><topic>Titanium alloys</topic><topic>Tool steels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rafaqat, Madiha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mufti, Nadeem Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Naveed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alahmari, Abdulrahman M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Amjad</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Applied sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rafaqat, Madiha</au><au>Mufti, Nadeem Ahmad</au><au>Ahmed, Naveed</au><au>Alahmari, Abdulrahman M.</au><au>Hussain, Amjad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs</atitle><jtitle>Applied sciences</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>7411</spage><pages>7411-</pages><issn>2076-3417</issn><eissn>2076-3417</eissn><abstract>Electric discharge machining (EDM) of tool steel (D2 grade) has been performed using different tool designs to produce through-holes. Machining performance has been gauged with reference to machining time, hole taper angle, overcut, and surface roughness. Inaccuracies and slow machining rate are considered as the most common limitations of the electric discharge machining (die-sinking). Traditionally, a cylindrical tool is used to form circular holes through EDM. In this study, the hole formation is carried out by changing the tool design which is the novelty of the research. Two-stage experimentation was performed. The newly designed tools substantially outperformed a traditional cylindrical tool, especially in terms of machining time. The main reason for the better machining results of modified tools is the sparking area that differs from the traditional sparking. Comparing against the performance of a traditional cylindrical tool, the newly designed tools offer a considerable reduction in the machining time, radial overcut, and roughness of the inside surfaces of machined holes, amounting to be approximately 50%, 30.6%, and 38.7%, respectively. The drop in the machining time along with a condensed level of radial overcut and surface roughness can shrink the EDM limitations and make the process relatively faster with low machining inaccuracies.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/app10217411</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7752-7199</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2076-3417 |
ispartof | Applied sciences, 2020-11, Vol.10 (21), p.7411 |
issn | 2076-3417 2076-3417 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1ebb06cf11004c97941ec7c2efd901f4 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Accuracy Aluminum D2 steel Design Die sinking Dies EDM EDM electrodes Electric discharge machining Electrodes Experimentation land thickness Machine shops machining time modified tools Optimization relief angle Steel Surface roughness Titanium alloys Tool steels |
title | EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T03%3A53%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EDM%20of%20D2%20Steel:%20Performance%20Comparison%20of%20EDM%20Die%20Sinking%20Electrode%20Designs&rft.jtitle=Applied%20sciences&rft.au=Rafaqat,%20Madiha&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=7411&rft.pages=7411-&rft.issn=2076-3417&rft.eissn=2076-3417&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/app10217411&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2534077343%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-456c1b818b2aefd4510fc3be4de18dbd7c54fe9ffaca681b49f440862f9663bd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2534077343&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |