Loading…

EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs

Electric discharge machining (EDM) of tool steel (D2 grade) has been performed using different tool designs to produce through-holes. Machining performance has been gauged with reference to machining time, hole taper angle, overcut, and surface roughness. Inaccuracies and slow machining rate are con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied sciences 2020-11, Vol.10 (21), p.7411
Main Authors: Rafaqat, Madiha, Mufti, Nadeem Ahmad, Ahmed, Naveed, Alahmari, Abdulrahman M., Hussain, Amjad
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-456c1b818b2aefd4510fc3be4de18dbd7c54fe9ffaca681b49f440862f9663bd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-456c1b818b2aefd4510fc3be4de18dbd7c54fe9ffaca681b49f440862f9663bd3
container_end_page
container_issue 21
container_start_page 7411
container_title Applied sciences
container_volume 10
creator Rafaqat, Madiha
Mufti, Nadeem Ahmad
Ahmed, Naveed
Alahmari, Abdulrahman M.
Hussain, Amjad
description Electric discharge machining (EDM) of tool steel (D2 grade) has been performed using different tool designs to produce through-holes. Machining performance has been gauged with reference to machining time, hole taper angle, overcut, and surface roughness. Inaccuracies and slow machining rate are considered as the most common limitations of the electric discharge machining (die-sinking). Traditionally, a cylindrical tool is used to form circular holes through EDM. In this study, the hole formation is carried out by changing the tool design which is the novelty of the research. Two-stage experimentation was performed. The newly designed tools substantially outperformed a traditional cylindrical tool, especially in terms of machining time. The main reason for the better machining results of modified tools is the sparking area that differs from the traditional sparking. Comparing against the performance of a traditional cylindrical tool, the newly designed tools offer a considerable reduction in the machining time, radial overcut, and roughness of the inside surfaces of machined holes, amounting to be approximately 50%, 30.6%, and 38.7%, respectively. The drop in the machining time along with a condensed level of radial overcut and surface roughness can shrink the EDM limitations and make the process relatively faster with low machining inaccuracies.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/app10217411
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1ebb06cf11004c97941ec7c2efd901f4</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1ebb06cf11004c97941ec7c2efd901f4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2534077343</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-456c1b818b2aefd4510fc3be4de18dbd7c54fe9ffaca681b49f440862f9663bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkFFLwzAUhYMoOHRP_oGAj1LNbdKk9U3WqYOJwvQ5pOnN6OyamnQP_ns7J7L7ci-Xj3MOh5ArYLecF-zO9D2wFJQAOCGTlCmZcAHq9Og-J9MYN2ycAngObEKW8_KFekfLlK4GxPaevmFwPmxNZ5HO_LY3oYm-2zN7tGyQrprus-nWdN6iHYKvkZYYm3UXL8mZM23E6d--IB-P8_fZc7J8fVrMHpaJ5VIMicikhSqHvEoNulpkwJzlFYoaIa-rWtlMOCycM9bIHCpROCFYLlNXSMmrml-QxUG39maj-9BsTfjW3jT69-HDWpswNLZFDVhVTFoHwJiwhSoEoFU2HX0LBk6MWtcHrT74rx3GQW_8LnRjfJ1mXDCluOAjdXOgbPAxBnT_rsD0vn191D7_AQ2ldS8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2534077343</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Rafaqat, Madiha ; Mufti, Nadeem Ahmad ; Ahmed, Naveed ; Alahmari, Abdulrahman M. ; Hussain, Amjad</creator><creatorcontrib>Rafaqat, Madiha ; Mufti, Nadeem Ahmad ; Ahmed, Naveed ; Alahmari, Abdulrahman M. ; Hussain, Amjad</creatorcontrib><description>Electric discharge machining (EDM) of tool steel (D2 grade) has been performed using different tool designs to produce through-holes. Machining performance has been gauged with reference to machining time, hole taper angle, overcut, and surface roughness. Inaccuracies and slow machining rate are considered as the most common limitations of the electric discharge machining (die-sinking). Traditionally, a cylindrical tool is used to form circular holes through EDM. In this study, the hole formation is carried out by changing the tool design which is the novelty of the research. Two-stage experimentation was performed. The newly designed tools substantially outperformed a traditional cylindrical tool, especially in terms of machining time. The main reason for the better machining results of modified tools is the sparking area that differs from the traditional sparking. Comparing against the performance of a traditional cylindrical tool, the newly designed tools offer a considerable reduction in the machining time, radial overcut, and roughness of the inside surfaces of machined holes, amounting to be approximately 50%, 30.6%, and 38.7%, respectively. The drop in the machining time along with a condensed level of radial overcut and surface roughness can shrink the EDM limitations and make the process relatively faster with low machining inaccuracies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2076-3417</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-3417</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/app10217411</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Aluminum ; D2 steel ; Design ; Die sinking ; Dies ; EDM ; EDM electrodes ; Electric discharge machining ; Electrodes ; Experimentation ; land thickness ; Machine shops ; machining time ; modified tools ; Optimization ; relief angle ; Steel ; Surface roughness ; Titanium alloys ; Tool steels</subject><ispartof>Applied sciences, 2020-11, Vol.10 (21), p.7411</ispartof><rights>2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-456c1b818b2aefd4510fc3be4de18dbd7c54fe9ffaca681b49f440862f9663bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-456c1b818b2aefd4510fc3be4de18dbd7c54fe9ffaca681b49f440862f9663bd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7752-7199</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2534077343/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2534077343?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rafaqat, Madiha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mufti, Nadeem Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Naveed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alahmari, Abdulrahman M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Amjad</creatorcontrib><title>EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs</title><title>Applied sciences</title><description>Electric discharge machining (EDM) of tool steel (D2 grade) has been performed using different tool designs to produce through-holes. Machining performance has been gauged with reference to machining time, hole taper angle, overcut, and surface roughness. Inaccuracies and slow machining rate are considered as the most common limitations of the electric discharge machining (die-sinking). Traditionally, a cylindrical tool is used to form circular holes through EDM. In this study, the hole formation is carried out by changing the tool design which is the novelty of the research. Two-stage experimentation was performed. The newly designed tools substantially outperformed a traditional cylindrical tool, especially in terms of machining time. The main reason for the better machining results of modified tools is the sparking area that differs from the traditional sparking. Comparing against the performance of a traditional cylindrical tool, the newly designed tools offer a considerable reduction in the machining time, radial overcut, and roughness of the inside surfaces of machined holes, amounting to be approximately 50%, 30.6%, and 38.7%, respectively. The drop in the machining time along with a condensed level of radial overcut and surface roughness can shrink the EDM limitations and make the process relatively faster with low machining inaccuracies.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>D2 steel</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Die sinking</subject><subject>Dies</subject><subject>EDM</subject><subject>EDM electrodes</subject><subject>Electric discharge machining</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>land thickness</subject><subject>Machine shops</subject><subject>machining time</subject><subject>modified tools</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>relief angle</subject><subject>Steel</subject><subject>Surface roughness</subject><subject>Titanium alloys</subject><subject>Tool steels</subject><issn>2076-3417</issn><issn>2076-3417</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkFFLwzAUhYMoOHRP_oGAj1LNbdKk9U3WqYOJwvQ5pOnN6OyamnQP_ns7J7L7ci-Xj3MOh5ArYLecF-zO9D2wFJQAOCGTlCmZcAHq9Og-J9MYN2ycAngObEKW8_KFekfLlK4GxPaevmFwPmxNZ5HO_LY3oYm-2zN7tGyQrprus-nWdN6iHYKvkZYYm3UXL8mZM23E6d--IB-P8_fZc7J8fVrMHpaJ5VIMicikhSqHvEoNulpkwJzlFYoaIa-rWtlMOCycM9bIHCpROCFYLlNXSMmrml-QxUG39maj-9BsTfjW3jT69-HDWpswNLZFDVhVTFoHwJiwhSoEoFU2HX0LBk6MWtcHrT74rx3GQW_8LnRjfJ1mXDCluOAjdXOgbPAxBnT_rsD0vn191D7_AQ2ldS8</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Rafaqat, Madiha</creator><creator>Mufti, Nadeem Ahmad</creator><creator>Ahmed, Naveed</creator><creator>Alahmari, Abdulrahman M.</creator><creator>Hussain, Amjad</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7752-7199</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs</title><author>Rafaqat, Madiha ; Mufti, Nadeem Ahmad ; Ahmed, Naveed ; Alahmari, Abdulrahman M. ; Hussain, Amjad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-456c1b818b2aefd4510fc3be4de18dbd7c54fe9ffaca681b49f440862f9663bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>D2 steel</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Die sinking</topic><topic>Dies</topic><topic>EDM</topic><topic>EDM electrodes</topic><topic>Electric discharge machining</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>land thickness</topic><topic>Machine shops</topic><topic>machining time</topic><topic>modified tools</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>relief angle</topic><topic>Steel</topic><topic>Surface roughness</topic><topic>Titanium alloys</topic><topic>Tool steels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rafaqat, Madiha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mufti, Nadeem Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Naveed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alahmari, Abdulrahman M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Amjad</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Applied sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rafaqat, Madiha</au><au>Mufti, Nadeem Ahmad</au><au>Ahmed, Naveed</au><au>Alahmari, Abdulrahman M.</au><au>Hussain, Amjad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs</atitle><jtitle>Applied sciences</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>7411</spage><pages>7411-</pages><issn>2076-3417</issn><eissn>2076-3417</eissn><abstract>Electric discharge machining (EDM) of tool steel (D2 grade) has been performed using different tool designs to produce through-holes. Machining performance has been gauged with reference to machining time, hole taper angle, overcut, and surface roughness. Inaccuracies and slow machining rate are considered as the most common limitations of the electric discharge machining (die-sinking). Traditionally, a cylindrical tool is used to form circular holes through EDM. In this study, the hole formation is carried out by changing the tool design which is the novelty of the research. Two-stage experimentation was performed. The newly designed tools substantially outperformed a traditional cylindrical tool, especially in terms of machining time. The main reason for the better machining results of modified tools is the sparking area that differs from the traditional sparking. Comparing against the performance of a traditional cylindrical tool, the newly designed tools offer a considerable reduction in the machining time, radial overcut, and roughness of the inside surfaces of machined holes, amounting to be approximately 50%, 30.6%, and 38.7%, respectively. The drop in the machining time along with a condensed level of radial overcut and surface roughness can shrink the EDM limitations and make the process relatively faster with low machining inaccuracies.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/app10217411</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7752-7199</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2076-3417
ispartof Applied sciences, 2020-11, Vol.10 (21), p.7411
issn 2076-3417
2076-3417
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_1ebb06cf11004c97941ec7c2efd901f4
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Accuracy
Aluminum
D2 steel
Design
Die sinking
Dies
EDM
EDM electrodes
Electric discharge machining
Electrodes
Experimentation
land thickness
Machine shops
machining time
modified tools
Optimization
relief angle
Steel
Surface roughness
Titanium alloys
Tool steels
title EDM of D2 Steel: Performance Comparison of EDM Die Sinking Electrode Designs
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T03%3A53%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EDM%20of%20D2%20Steel:%20Performance%20Comparison%20of%20EDM%20Die%20Sinking%20Electrode%20Designs&rft.jtitle=Applied%20sciences&rft.au=Rafaqat,%20Madiha&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=7411&rft.pages=7411-&rft.issn=2076-3417&rft.eissn=2076-3417&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/app10217411&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2534077343%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-456c1b818b2aefd4510fc3be4de18dbd7c54fe9ffaca681b49f440862f9663bd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2534077343&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true