Loading…

Radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced CT predicts lymphovascular invasion and disease outcome in gastric cancer: a preliminary study

To determine whether radiomics features based on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) can preoperatively predict lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and clinical outcome in gastric cancer (GC) patients. In total, 160 surgically resected patients were retrospectively analyzed, and seven predictive models were const...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancer imaging 2020-04, Vol.20 (1), p.24-24, Article 24
Main Authors: Chen, Xiaofeng, Yang, Zhiqi, Yang, Jiada, Liao, Yuting, Pang, Peipei, Fan, Weixiong, Chen, Xiangguang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c660t-68bb6b4a36685838f609353c13a495f9829a61b27b7afa43815445aa3e7abb0d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c660t-68bb6b4a36685838f609353c13a495f9829a61b27b7afa43815445aa3e7abb0d3
container_end_page 24
container_issue 1
container_start_page 24
container_title Cancer imaging
container_volume 20
creator Chen, Xiaofeng
Yang, Zhiqi
Yang, Jiada
Liao, Yuting
Pang, Peipei
Fan, Weixiong
Chen, Xiangguang
description To determine whether radiomics features based on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) can preoperatively predict lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and clinical outcome in gastric cancer (GC) patients. In total, 160 surgically resected patients were retrospectively analyzed, and seven predictive models were constructed. Three radiomics predictive models were built from radiomics features based on arterial (A), venous (V) and combination of two phase (A + V) images. Then, three Radscores (A-Radscore, V-Radscore and A + V-Radscore) were obtained. Another four predictive models were constructed by the three Radscores and clinical risk factors through multivariate logistic regression. A nomogram was developed to predict LVI by incorporating A + V-Radscore and clinical risk factors. Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test were utilized to analyze the outcome of LVI. Radiomics related to tumor size and intratumoral inhomogeneity were the top-ranked LVI predicting features. The related Radscores showed significant differences according to LVI status (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s40644-020-00302-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_233bfad097e541da8879fc36978e7815</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A627328479</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_233bfad097e541da8879fc36978e7815</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A627328479</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c660t-68bb6b4a36685838f609353c13a495f9829a61b27b7afa43815445aa3e7abb0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6B7yQgCDedE2TNB9eCMvgx8KCIOt1OE3SaYa2GZN2Yf6Av9t0ZlxmRHKRkLznOSfnvEXxusLXVSX5h8QwZ6zEBJcYU0zK-klxWTGBS0EpfnpyvihepLTBmCipxPPighLCpCTksvj9A6wPgzcJwQj9LvmEQotMGKcIaSrd2MFonEWre7SNznozJdTvhm0XHiCZuYeI_JiPPoyZYJH1yUFyKMyTCYPLj2idQdEbZBZS_IhgIfV-8CPEHUrTbHcvi2ct9Mm9Ou5Xxc8vn-9X38q7719vVzd3peEcTyWXTcMbBpRzWUsqW44VrampKDBVt0oSBbxqiGgEtMCorGrGagDqBDQNtvSquD1wbYCN3kY_5BJ0AK_3FyGuNcTJm95pQmnTgsVKuJpVFqQUqjWUKyGdyODM-nRgbedmcNa4pWX9GfT8ZfSdXocHLSpKpFoA74-AGH7NLk168Mm4vofRhTnlCmSeL8GYZ-nbf6SbMMc8sEWlqhpjvAceVWvIH_BjG3Jes0D1DSciZ2VCZdX1f1R5WZd9EEbX-nx_FvDuJKBz0E9dCv085ZmncyE5CE0MKUXXPjajwnqxrD5YVmfL6r1l9VL0m9M2Pob89Sj9A8Me5oM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2391500095</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced CT predicts lymphovascular invasion and disease outcome in gastric cancer: a preliminary study</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Chen, Xiaofeng ; Yang, Zhiqi ; Yang, Jiada ; Liao, Yuting ; Pang, Peipei ; Fan, Weixiong ; Chen, Xiangguang</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiaofeng ; Yang, Zhiqi ; Yang, Jiada ; Liao, Yuting ; Pang, Peipei ; Fan, Weixiong ; Chen, Xiangguang</creatorcontrib><description>To determine whether radiomics features based on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) can preoperatively predict lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and clinical outcome in gastric cancer (GC) patients. In total, 160 surgically resected patients were retrospectively analyzed, and seven predictive models were constructed. Three radiomics predictive models were built from radiomics features based on arterial (A), venous (V) and combination of two phase (A + V) images. Then, three Radscores (A-Radscore, V-Radscore and A + V-Radscore) were obtained. Another four predictive models were constructed by the three Radscores and clinical risk factors through multivariate logistic regression. A nomogram was developed to predict LVI by incorporating A + V-Radscore and clinical risk factors. Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test were utilized to analyze the outcome of LVI. Radiomics related to tumor size and intratumoral inhomogeneity were the top-ranked LVI predicting features. The related Radscores showed significant differences according to LVI status (P &lt; 0.01). Univariate logistic analysis identified three clinical features (T stage, N stage and AJCC stage) and three Radscores as LVI predictive factors. The Clinical-Radscore (namely, A + V + C) model that used all these factors showed a higher performance (AUC = 0.856) than the clinical (namely, C, including T stage, N stage and AJCC stage) model (AUC = 0.810) and the A + V-Radscore model (AUC = 0.795) in the train cohort. For patients without LVI and with LVI, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.5 and 8.0 months (P &lt; 0.001),and the median OS was 20.2 and 17.0 months (P = 0.3), respectively. In the Clinical-Radscore-predicted LVI absent and LVI present groups, the median PFS was 11.0 and 8.0 months (P = 0.03), and the median OS was 20.0 and 18.0 months (P = 0.05), respectively. N stage, LVI status and Clinical-Radscore-predicted LVI status were associated with disease-specific recurrence or mortality. Radiomics features based on CECT may serve as potential markers to successfully predict LVI and PFS, but no evidence was found that these features were related to OS. Considering that it is a single central study, multi-center validation studies will be required in the future to verify its clinical feasibility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-7330</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1740-5025</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-7330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40644-020-00302-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32248822</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Antigens ; Artificial intelligence ; Cancer ; Cancer research ; Clinical outcome ; Gastric cancer ; Histopathology ; Inhomogeneity ; Lymphovascular invasion ; Mortality ; Nomograms ; Open source software ; Patient outcomes ; Patients ; Prediction models ; Prognosis ; Radiomics ; Rank tests ; Regression analysis ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; Stomach cancer ; Studies ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Cancer imaging, 2020-04, Vol.20 (1), p.24-24, Article 24</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c660t-68bb6b4a36685838f609353c13a495f9829a61b27b7afa43815445aa3e7abb0d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c660t-68bb6b4a36685838f609353c13a495f9829a61b27b7afa43815445aa3e7abb0d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7132895/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2391500095?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32248822$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiaofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhiqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jiada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Yuting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pang, Peipei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Weixiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiangguang</creatorcontrib><title>Radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced CT predicts lymphovascular invasion and disease outcome in gastric cancer: a preliminary study</title><title>Cancer imaging</title><addtitle>Cancer Imaging</addtitle><description>To determine whether radiomics features based on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) can preoperatively predict lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and clinical outcome in gastric cancer (GC) patients. In total, 160 surgically resected patients were retrospectively analyzed, and seven predictive models were constructed. Three radiomics predictive models were built from radiomics features based on arterial (A), venous (V) and combination of two phase (A + V) images. Then, three Radscores (A-Radscore, V-Radscore and A + V-Radscore) were obtained. Another four predictive models were constructed by the three Radscores and clinical risk factors through multivariate logistic regression. A nomogram was developed to predict LVI by incorporating A + V-Radscore and clinical risk factors. Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test were utilized to analyze the outcome of LVI. Radiomics related to tumor size and intratumoral inhomogeneity were the top-ranked LVI predicting features. The related Radscores showed significant differences according to LVI status (P &lt; 0.01). Univariate logistic analysis identified three clinical features (T stage, N stage and AJCC stage) and three Radscores as LVI predictive factors. The Clinical-Radscore (namely, A + V + C) model that used all these factors showed a higher performance (AUC = 0.856) than the clinical (namely, C, including T stage, N stage and AJCC stage) model (AUC = 0.810) and the A + V-Radscore model (AUC = 0.795) in the train cohort. For patients without LVI and with LVI, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.5 and 8.0 months (P &lt; 0.001),and the median OS was 20.2 and 17.0 months (P = 0.3), respectively. In the Clinical-Radscore-predicted LVI absent and LVI present groups, the median PFS was 11.0 and 8.0 months (P = 0.03), and the median OS was 20.0 and 18.0 months (P = 0.05), respectively. N stage, LVI status and Clinical-Radscore-predicted LVI status were associated with disease-specific recurrence or mortality. Radiomics features based on CECT may serve as potential markers to successfully predict LVI and PFS, but no evidence was found that these features were related to OS. Considering that it is a single central study, multi-center validation studies will be required in the future to verify its clinical feasibility.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer research</subject><subject>Clinical outcome</subject><subject>Gastric cancer</subject><subject>Histopathology</subject><subject>Inhomogeneity</subject><subject>Lymphovascular invasion</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Nomograms</subject><subject>Open source software</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Radiomics</subject><subject>Rank tests</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Stomach cancer</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>1470-7330</issn><issn>1740-5025</issn><issn>1470-7330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6B7yQgCDedE2TNB9eCMvgx8KCIOt1OE3SaYa2GZN2Yf6Av9t0ZlxmRHKRkLznOSfnvEXxusLXVSX5h8QwZ6zEBJcYU0zK-klxWTGBS0EpfnpyvihepLTBmCipxPPighLCpCTksvj9A6wPgzcJwQj9LvmEQotMGKcIaSrd2MFonEWre7SNznozJdTvhm0XHiCZuYeI_JiPPoyZYJH1yUFyKMyTCYPLj2idQdEbZBZS_IhgIfV-8CPEHUrTbHcvi2ct9Mm9Ou5Xxc8vn-9X38q7719vVzd3peEcTyWXTcMbBpRzWUsqW44VrampKDBVt0oSBbxqiGgEtMCorGrGagDqBDQNtvSquD1wbYCN3kY_5BJ0AK_3FyGuNcTJm95pQmnTgsVKuJpVFqQUqjWUKyGdyODM-nRgbedmcNa4pWX9GfT8ZfSdXocHLSpKpFoA74-AGH7NLk168Mm4vofRhTnlCmSeL8GYZ-nbf6SbMMc8sEWlqhpjvAceVWvIH_BjG3Jes0D1DSciZ2VCZdX1f1R5WZd9EEbX-nx_FvDuJKBz0E9dCv085ZmncyE5CE0MKUXXPjajwnqxrD5YVmfL6r1l9VL0m9M2Pob89Sj9A8Me5oM</recordid><startdate>20200405</startdate><enddate>20200405</enddate><creator>Chen, Xiaofeng</creator><creator>Yang, Zhiqi</creator><creator>Yang, Jiada</creator><creator>Liao, Yuting</creator><creator>Pang, Peipei</creator><creator>Fan, Weixiong</creator><creator>Chen, Xiangguang</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200405</creationdate><title>Radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced CT predicts lymphovascular invasion and disease outcome in gastric cancer: a preliminary study</title><author>Chen, Xiaofeng ; Yang, Zhiqi ; Yang, Jiada ; Liao, Yuting ; Pang, Peipei ; Fan, Weixiong ; Chen, Xiangguang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c660t-68bb6b4a36685838f609353c13a495f9829a61b27b7afa43815445aa3e7abb0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer research</topic><topic>Clinical outcome</topic><topic>Gastric cancer</topic><topic>Histopathology</topic><topic>Inhomogeneity</topic><topic>Lymphovascular invasion</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Nomograms</topic><topic>Open source software</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Radiomics</topic><topic>Rank tests</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Stomach cancer</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiaofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhiqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jiada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Yuting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pang, Peipei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Weixiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiangguang</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Cancer imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Xiaofeng</au><au>Yang, Zhiqi</au><au>Yang, Jiada</au><au>Liao, Yuting</au><au>Pang, Peipei</au><au>Fan, Weixiong</au><au>Chen, Xiangguang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced CT predicts lymphovascular invasion and disease outcome in gastric cancer: a preliminary study</atitle><jtitle>Cancer imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Imaging</addtitle><date>2020-04-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>24-24</pages><artnum>24</artnum><issn>1470-7330</issn><issn>1740-5025</issn><eissn>1470-7330</eissn><abstract>To determine whether radiomics features based on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) can preoperatively predict lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and clinical outcome in gastric cancer (GC) patients. In total, 160 surgically resected patients were retrospectively analyzed, and seven predictive models were constructed. Three radiomics predictive models were built from radiomics features based on arterial (A), venous (V) and combination of two phase (A + V) images. Then, three Radscores (A-Radscore, V-Radscore and A + V-Radscore) were obtained. Another four predictive models were constructed by the three Radscores and clinical risk factors through multivariate logistic regression. A nomogram was developed to predict LVI by incorporating A + V-Radscore and clinical risk factors. Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test were utilized to analyze the outcome of LVI. Radiomics related to tumor size and intratumoral inhomogeneity were the top-ranked LVI predicting features. The related Radscores showed significant differences according to LVI status (P &lt; 0.01). Univariate logistic analysis identified three clinical features (T stage, N stage and AJCC stage) and three Radscores as LVI predictive factors. The Clinical-Radscore (namely, A + V + C) model that used all these factors showed a higher performance (AUC = 0.856) than the clinical (namely, C, including T stage, N stage and AJCC stage) model (AUC = 0.810) and the A + V-Radscore model (AUC = 0.795) in the train cohort. For patients without LVI and with LVI, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.5 and 8.0 months (P &lt; 0.001),and the median OS was 20.2 and 17.0 months (P = 0.3), respectively. In the Clinical-Radscore-predicted LVI absent and LVI present groups, the median PFS was 11.0 and 8.0 months (P = 0.03), and the median OS was 20.0 and 18.0 months (P = 0.05), respectively. N stage, LVI status and Clinical-Radscore-predicted LVI status were associated with disease-specific recurrence or mortality. Radiomics features based on CECT may serve as potential markers to successfully predict LVI and PFS, but no evidence was found that these features were related to OS. Considering that it is a single central study, multi-center validation studies will be required in the future to verify its clinical feasibility.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>32248822</pmid><doi>10.1186/s40644-020-00302-5</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-7330
ispartof Cancer imaging, 2020-04, Vol.20 (1), p.24-24, Article 24
issn 1470-7330
1740-5025
1470-7330
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_233bfad097e541da8879fc36978e7815
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Analysis
Antigens
Artificial intelligence
Cancer
Cancer research
Clinical outcome
Gastric cancer
Histopathology
Inhomogeneity
Lymphovascular invasion
Mortality
Nomograms
Open source software
Patient outcomes
Patients
Prediction models
Prognosis
Radiomics
Rank tests
Regression analysis
Risk analysis
Risk factors
Stomach cancer
Studies
Surgery
title Radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced CT predicts lymphovascular invasion and disease outcome in gastric cancer: a preliminary study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T01%3A37%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiomics%20analysis%20of%20contrast-enhanced%20CT%20predicts%20lymphovascular%20invasion%20and%20disease%20outcome%20in%20gastric%20cancer:%20a%20preliminary%20study&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20imaging&rft.au=Chen,%20Xiaofeng&rft.date=2020-04-05&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=24-24&rft.artnum=24&rft.issn=1470-7330&rft.eissn=1470-7330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40644-020-00302-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA627328479%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c660t-68bb6b4a36685838f609353c13a495f9829a61b27b7afa43815445aa3e7abb0d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2391500095&rft_id=info:pmid/32248822&rft_galeid=A627328479&rfr_iscdi=true