Canadian farmers' perceptions of social sustainability in agriculture

• Published in: PloS one 2024-04, Vol.19 (4), p.e0299100-e0299100
• Main Authors: Heise, Heather, Hrvatin, Felicia, Cran, Abbey, Matthews, June
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Agriculture; Canada; Conservation of Natural Resources; Environmental aspects; Farmers; Farmers - psychology; Female; Food; Health aspects; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Perception; Safety and security measures; Social aspects; Sustainable agriculture
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299100

Sustainable food production is an important part of dietetic education and training; however, the focus in the dietetic sphere is often on the environmental aspect. Understanding the multi-dimensional nature of sustainability can enhance dietetic students' sustainability competences-such as empathy and change of perspective, systems thinking, and critical thinking and analysis-to help them in their future careers and strengthen their position in society as trusted and knowledgeable food and nutrition professionals. Enhancing public understanding of sustainable food production is imperative as populations become more urban, are less connected to agriculture, and have expectations for sustainably grown/raised food, often without knowing current food production practices or the multiple aspects of sustainability that must be in place for farmers to meet those demands. The goal of this research was to understand Canadian farmers' perceptions of environmental, economic, and social aspects of sustainable food production. Employing a descriptive qualitative approach and constant comparative analysis, four food and nutrition researchers analyzed interviews from 52 farmers from across Canada. Participants had to be English-speaking, produce food through farming on land, and own or rent the land on which they farm. Telephone/video interviews revealed five overarching social themes: (1) the importance of community and social capital, (2) public perception and social license to operate, (3) lack of infrastructure, and (4) deep connections to personal lives. The final theme, mental health issues (5), reflected the consequences of the multiple sources of stress that can undermine the social sustainability of farmers, farm communities, and food production. These findings may help various audiences appreciate the multiple dimensions of sustainable food production; reflect on their values, perceptions, and actions with regard to agriculture; and enhance their compassion and empathy for all farmers.