Barriers to adherence to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease guidelines by primary care physicians

• Published in: International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2011-01, Vol.6 (default), p.171-179
• Main Authors: Salinas, Gregory D, Williamson, James C, Kalhan, Ravi, Thomashow, Byron, Scheckermann, Jodi L, Walsh, John, Abdolrasulnia, Maziar, Foster, Jill A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Attitude of Health Personnel; Bronchodilator Agents - therapeutic use; Chi-Square Distribution; Clinical Competence - standards; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Guideline Adherence - standards; Health Care Surveys; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Odds Ratio; Original Research; Perception; Physicians, Primary Care - standards; Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - diagnosis; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - therapy; Self Efficacy; Spirometry - standards; United States
• ISSN: 1178-2005; 1176-9106; 1178-2005
• DOI: 10.2147/copd.s16396

Even with the dissemination of several clinical guidelines, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains underdiagnosed and mismanaged by many primary care physicians (PCPs). The objective of this study was to elucidate barriers to consistent implementation of COPD guidelines. A cross-sectional study implemented in July 2008 was designed to assess attitudes and barriers to COPD guideline usage. Five hundred US PCPs (309 family medicine physicians, 191 internists) were included in the analysis. Overall, 23.6% of the surveyed PCPs reported adherence to spirometry guidelines over 90% of the time; 25.8% reported adherence to guidelines related to long-acting bronchodilator (LABD) use in COPD patients. In general, physicians were only somewhat familiar with COPD guidelines, and internal medicine physicians were significantly more familiar than family physicians (P < 0.05). In a multivariate model controlling for demographics and barriers to guideline adherence, we found significant associations with two tested guideline components. Adherence to spirometry guidelines was associated with agreement with guidelines, confidence in interpreting data, ambivalence to outcome expectancy, and ability to incorporate spirometry into patient flow. Adherence to LABD therapy guidelines was associated with agreement with guidelines and confidence in gauging pharmacologic response. Adherence to guideline recommendations of spirometry use was predicted by agreement with the recommendations, self-efficacy, perceived outcome expectancy if recommendations were adhered to, and resource availability. Adherence to recommendations of LABD use was predicted by agreement with guideline recommendations and self-efficacy. Increasing guideline familiarity alone may have limited patient outcomes, as other barriers, such as low confidence and outcome expectancy, are more likely to impact guideline adherence.