Farm animal welfare regulatory preferences and food choice: survey evidence from the US

Public support is critical for the incorporation of farm animal welfare (FAW) standards into national food policies. Multiple pathways, e.g., market-based policies, political mandates, and donations to animal charities, exist for the public to influence these standards. The challenge often remains t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agricultural and food economics 2024-12, Vol.12 (1), p.19-23
Main Author: Boaitey, Albert
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agricultural Economics
Agriculture
Animal welfare
Charities
Contingent valuation
Dietary choice
Economics
Economics and Finance
Farming
Farms
Food
Food policy
Food preferences
Human values
Livestock
Policies
Politics
Regulatory mechanisms (biology)
Strategic behavior
Surveys
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Public support is critical for the incorporation of farm animal welfare (FAW) standards into national food policies. Multiple pathways, e.g., market-based policies, political mandates, and donations to animal charities, exist for the public to influence these standards. The challenge often remains that citizens may express significantly different regulatory preferences from consumers thereby disproportionally overburdening the latter. For food, this consumer–citizen role is directly linked to dietary choice. Although a large body of research has examined the determinants of dietary choice on the one hand, and FAW policy preferences, on the other, no attempt has been made to address these issues side by side. This study explores the preferences for FAW regulatory mechanisms and strategic behavior among dietary groups. Preferences for private labeling, political mandates, and donations to charities in support of and against conventional agriculture are examined. Data are from an online survey of 1020 residents conducted in the US. The results show a proclivity among segments of the public who do not consume livestock products for political mandates and the tendency to behave strategically. Regulatory preferences are embedded within distinct human value orientations. Urban—non-urban, generational and gender divides in regulatory preferences are also identified. These insights are relevant for the ongoing development of FAW standards given the portfolio of mechanisms at the disposal of stakeholders.
ISSN:2193-7532
DOI:10.1186/s40100-024-00313-x