Reliability of genomic variants across different next-generation sequencing platforms and bioinformatic processing pipelines

• Published in: BMC genomics 2021-01, Vol.22 (1), p.62-62, Article 62
• Main Authors: Weißbach, Stephan, Sys, Stanislav, Hewel, Charlotte, Todorov, Hristo, Schweiger, Susann, Winter, Jennifer, Pfenninger, Markus, Torkamani, Ali, Evans, Doug, Burger, Joachim, Everschor-Sitte, Karin, May-Simera, Helen Louise, Gerber, Susanne
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Alu elements; Analysis; Best practice; Bioinformatics; Computational Biology; Confidence intervals; Cross-Sectional Studies; Data analysis; DNA sequencing; Empirical analysis; Gene deletion; Genetic variation; Genomes; Genomics; Healthy aging; Heterogeneity; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Humans; Illumina; Insertion; Introns; Longevity; Methods; Monte Carlo simulation; Next-generation sequencing; Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies; Nucleotide sequencing; Nucleotides; Platform-biases; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Regions; Reprocessing; Reproducibility of Results; Sequences; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Statistical analysis; Systematic errors; Wellderly
• ISSN: 1471-2164; 1471-2164
• DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-07362-8

Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) is the fundament of various studies, providing insights into questions from biology and medicine. Nevertheless, integrating data from different experimental backgrounds can introduce strong biases. In order to methodically investigate the magnitude of systematic errors in single nucleotide variant calls, we performed a cross-sectional observational study on a genomic cohort of 99 subjects each sequenced via (i) Illumina HiSeq X, (ii) Illumina HiSeq, and (iii) Complete Genomics and processed with the respective bioinformatic pipeline. We also repeated variant calling for the Illumina cohorts with GATK, which allowed us to investigate the effect of the bioinformatics analysis strategy separately from the sequencing platform's impact. The number of detected variants/variant classes per individual was highly dependent on the experimental setup. We observed a statistically significant overrepresentation of variants uniquely called by a single setup, indicating potential systematic biases. Insertion/deletion polymorphisms (indels) were associated with decreased concordance compared to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The discrepancies in indel absolute numbers were particularly prominent in introns, Alu elements, simple repeats, and regions with medium GC content. Notably, reprocessing sequencing data following the best practice recommendations of GATK considerably improved concordance between the respective setups. We provide empirical evidence of systematic heterogeneity in variant calls between alternative experimental and data analysis setups. Furthermore, our results demonstrate the benefit of reprocessing genomic data with harmonized pipelines when integrating data from different studies.