Pre-Treatment Tumor Growth Rate Predicts Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Therapy

• Published in: Frontiers in oncology 2021-01, Vol.10, p.621329-621329
• Main Authors: He, Li-Na, Zhang, Xuanye, Li, Haifeng, Chen, Tao, Chen, Chen, Zhou, Yixin, Lin, Zuan, Du, Wei, Fang, Wenfeng, Yang, Yunpeng, Huang, Yan, Zhao, Hongyun, Hong, Shaodong, Zhang, Li
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy; immunotherapy; non-small cell lung cancer; NSCLC; Oncology; progression-free survival; tumor growth rate
• ISSN: 2234-943X; 2234-943X
• DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.621329

Tumor growth rate (TGR; percent size change per month [%/m]) is postulated as an early radio-graphic predictor of response to anti-cancer treatment to overcome limitations of RECIST. We aimed to evaluate the predictive value of pre-treatment TGR (TGR ) for outcomes of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. We retrospectively screened all aNSCLC patients who received PD-1 axis inhibitors in Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center between August 2016 and June 2018. TGR was calculated as the percentage change in tumor size per month (%/m) derived from two computed tomography (CT) scans during a "wash-out" period before the initiation of PD-1 axis inhibition. Final follow-up date was August 28, 2019. The X-tile program was used to identify the cut-off value of TGR based on maximum progression-free survival (PFS) stratification. Patients were divided into two groups per the selected TGR cut-off. The primary outcome was the difference of PFS between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression models were performed for survival analysis. A total of 80 eligible patients were included (54 [67.5%] male; median [range] age, 55 [30-74] years). Median (range) TGR was 21.1 (-33.7-246.0)%/m. The optimal cut-off value of TGR was 25.3%/m. Patients with high TGR had shorter median PFS (1.8 months; 95% CI, 1.6 - 2.1 months) than those with low TGR (2.7 months; 95% CI, 0.5 - 4.9 months) ( = 0.005). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that higher TGR independently predicted inferior PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.97; 95% CI, 1.08-3.60; = 0.026). Higher TGR was also significantly associated with less durable clinical benefit rate (34.8% vs. 8.8%, = 0.007). High pre-treatment TGR was a reliable predictor of inferior PFS and clinical benefit in aNSCLC patients undergoing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. The findings highlight the role of TGR as an early biomarker to predict benefit from immunotherapy and could allow tailoring patient's follow-up.