Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques

• Published in: Revista brasileira de ortopedia 2019-02, Vol.54 (1), p.45-52
• Main Authors: Temponi, Eduardo Frois, Marques da Costa, Luís Henrique Grassi, Soares, Luiz Fernando Machado, Carvalho Júnior, Lúcio Honório de
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; flexor graft; infection; Original | Artigo Original; ORTHOPEDICS; septic arthritis
• ISSN: 0102-3616; 1982-4378; 1982-4378
• DOI: 10.1016/j.rbo.2017.09.008

To evaluate the contamination rate of hamstring tendon autografts by comparing two different techniques, and to verify whether intraoperative contamination is associated with the development of clinical infection in patients submitted to reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). A total of 110 hamstring tendon autograft ACL reconstructions were performed and divided into two groups: 1-hamstring tendon retraction technique; and 2 - technique maintaining the tibial insertion of the hamstring tendon. During the preparation, two graft fragments were sent for culturing; the harvesting time, the preparation time, and the total surgery time were measured. Twenty-four hours after the surgery, the C-reactive protein was assayed. The clinical outpatient follow-up was performed up to 180 days postoperatively. Although there were two postoperative infections, there was no graft contamination or difference between the groups in relation to the graft preparation time and to the 24-hour postoperative C-reactive protein assessment. The classic technique presented a longer graft harvesting time (  = 0.038), and there was no statistical difference between the 2 groups regarding the degree of contamination and consequent clinical infection, although 2 patients in group 2 presented with infection, with negative perioperative cultures. Based on the results obtained, there was no association between graft contamination and the time or technique of its preparation. In addition, there was also no association between intraoperative contamination and the development of clinical infection, nor was there any sign of an association between the early alteration of C-reactive protein and the onset of infection.