Loading…

Development, validation and comparison of two stability-indicating RP-LC methods using charged aerosol and UV detectors for analysis of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in capsules

Two new stability-indicating liquid chromatographic methods using two detectors, an ultraviolet (UV) and a charged aerosol detector (CAD) simultaneously connected in series were validated for the assessment of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) in capsule. The method was optimized and the influence o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arabian journal of chemistry 2016-11, Vol.9 (S2), p.S1905-S1914
Main Authors: Carlos, Graciela, Comiran, Eloisa, de Oliveira, Marcella Herbstrith, Limberger, Renata Pereira, Bergold, Ana Maria, Fröehlich, Pedro Eduardo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Two new stability-indicating liquid chromatographic methods using two detectors, an ultraviolet (UV) and a charged aerosol detector (CAD) simultaneously connected in series were validated for the assessment of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) in capsule. The method was optimized and the influence of individual parameters on UV and CAD response and sensitivity was studied. Chromatography was performed on a Zorbax CN column (250mm×4.6mm, 5μm) in an isocratic elution mode, using acetonitrile and 20mM ammonium formate at pH 4.0 (50:50, v/v) as mobile phase and UV detection at 207nm. The developed method was validated according to ICH guidelines and the parameters’ specificity, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, linearity, accuracy, precision and robustness were evaluated. CAD is designated to be a non-linear detector in a wide dynamic range, however, the method was linear over the concentration range of 70–130μgmL−1 in both detectors. The method was precise and accurate. Robustness study was performed by a Plackett–Burman design, delivering results within the acceptable range. Neither the excipients nor the degradation products showed interference in the method after studies of specificity as well as under stress conditions. The results of the LC-UV and LC-CAD methods were statistically compared through ANOVA and showed no significant difference (p>0.05). Both proposed methods could be considered interchangeable and stability-indicating, and can be applied as an appropriate quality control tool for routine analysis of LDX in capsule.
ISSN:1878-5352
1878-5379
DOI:10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.06.001