Loading…
Good agreements between self and clinician-collected specimens for the detection of human papillomavirus in Brazilian patients
Women infected with human papillomavirus (HPV) are at a higher risk of developing cervical lesions. In the current study, self and clinician-collected vaginal and cervical samples from women were processed to detect HPV DNA using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with PGMY09/11 primers. HPV genotypes...
Saved in:
Published in: | Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 2014-06, Vol.109 (3), p.352-355 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Women infected with human papillomavirus (HPV) are at a higher risk of
developing cervical lesions. In the current study, self and
clinician-collected vaginal and cervical samples from women were
processed to detect HPV DNA using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with
PGMY09/11 primers. HPV genotypes were determined using type-specific
PCR. HPV DNA detection showed good concordance between self and
clinician-collected samples (84.6%; kappa = 0.72). HPV infection was
found in 30% women and genotyping was more concordant among high-risk
HPV (HR-HPV) than low-risk HPV (HR-HPV). HPV16 was the most frequently
detected among the HR-HPV types. LR-HPV was detected at a higher
frequency in self-collected; however, HR-HPV types were more frequently
identified in clinician-collected samples than in self-collected
samples. HPV infections of multiple types were detected in 20.5% of
clinician-collected samples and 15.5% of self-collected samples. In
this study, we demonstrated that the HPV DNA detection rate in
self-collected samples has good agreement with that of
clinician-collected samples. Self-collected sampling, as a primary
prevention strategy in countries with few resources, could be effective
for identifying cases of HR-HPV, being more acceptable. The use of this
method would enhance the coverage of screening programs for cervical
cancer. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1678-8060 0074-0276 1678-8060 |
DOI: | 10.1590/0074-0276130397 |