Investigation of the Utility of Features in a Clinical De-identification Model: A Demonstration Using EHR Pathology Reports for Advanced NSCLC Patients

• Published in: Frontiers in digital health 2022-02, Vol.4, p.728922-728922
• Main Authors: Paul, Tanmoy, Rana, Md Kamruz Zaman, Tautam, Preethi Aishwarya, Kotapati, Teja Venkat Pavan, Jampani, Yaswitha, Singh, Nitesh, Islam, Humayera, Mandhadi, Vasanthi, Sharma, Vishakha, Barnes, Michael, Hammer, Richard D, Mosa, Abu Saleh Mohammad
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: clinical text de-identification; conditional random field; de-identification; Digital Health; named entity recognition; NLP; protected health information
• ISSN: 2673-253X; 2673-253X
• DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.728922

Electronic health record (EHR) systems contain a large volume of texts, including visit notes, discharge summaries, and various reports. To protect the confidentiality of patients, these records often need to be fully de-identified before circulating for secondary use. Machine learning (ML) based named entity recognition (NER) model has emerged as a popular technique of automatic de-identification. The performance of a machine learning model highly depends on the selection of appropriate features. The objective of this study was to investigate the usability of multiple features in building a conditional random field (CRF) based clinical de-identification NER model. Using open-source natural language processing (NLP) toolkits, we annotated protected health information (PHI) in 1,500 pathology reports and built supervised NER models using multiple features and their combinations. We further investigated the dependency of a model's performance on the size of training data. Among the 10 feature extractors explored in this study, n-gram, prefix-suffix, word embedding, and word shape performed the best. A model using combination of these four feature sets yielded precision, recall, and F1-score for each PHI as follows: NAME (0.80; 0.79; 0.80), LOCATION (0.85; 0.83; 0.84), DATE (0.86; 0.79; 0.82), HOSPITAL (0.96; 0.93; 0.95), ID (0.99; 0.82; 0.90), and INITIALS (0.97; 0.49; 0.65). We also found that the model's performance becomes saturated when the training data size is beyond 200. Manual de-identification of large-scale data is an impractical procedure since it is time-consuming and subject to human errors. Analysis of the NER model's performance in this study sheds light on a semi-automatic clinical de-identification pipeline for enterprise-wide data warehousing.