Loading…

MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS BETWEEN NIPAH VIRUS V AND DNA DAMAGE-BINDING PROTEIN (DDB1): A COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR DOCKING STUDY

The Nipah virus (NiV) V protein has been associated with evasion of host cell interferon (IFN) signal transduction, which promotes STAT degradation by binding to DNA damage-binding protein 1 (DDB1). Recent studies have shown that the NiV V protein was able to interact with DDB1 by its zinc finger do...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of infectious diseases 2023-05, Vol.130, p.S127-S127
Main Authors: Ning, C. Chee, Liew, Y.J.M., bin Jonet, M.A., Chang, L.-Y.
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The Nipah virus (NiV) V protein has been associated with evasion of host cell interferon (IFN) signal transduction, which promotes STAT degradation by binding to DNA damage-binding protein 1 (DDB1). Recent studies have shown that the NiV V protein was able to interact with DDB1 by its zinc finger domain (ZnFD) at C-terminal region (CTD). In this study, the molecular interactions between the NiV V proteins from two NiV isolates (NiV pig isolate, iP-V and NiV bat isolate, iB-V) and DDB1 protein were examined using computational molecular docking studies. The iP-V was noted to have a lower binding affinity (-13.2kcal/mol) and a total stabilization energy of -344.23kJ/mol toward DDB1 compared to iB-V, which has a binding affinity of -13.7kcal/mol and stabilization energy of -450.83kJ/mol. The iP-V interacted with DDB1 at amino acid residue positions 366 to 456, which involved both the NTD and CTD of V protein; while the interaction of iB-V with DDB1 was identified at the NTD only, at positions 2 to 172. There were two mutations identified in the CTD of iB-V, which is the zinc binding domain; therefore, it lacks one zinc ion in its ZnFD for interaction with DDB1. Nevertheless, the interaction of iP-V and iB-V with DDB1 involved three conserved residues on DDB1 (Tyr906, Arg928, and Phe1003). Additionally, the iP- V and iB-V bind to the beta-propeller A (BPA), beta-propeller C (BPC), and CTD of DDB1. The findings from this study demonstrated that the binding region of iB-V to DDB1 was different from that of iP-V due to the lack of one ZnFD in iB- V. Future studies such as site-directed mutagenesis of key amino acid residues will be needed to further confirm the interaction profile.
ISSN:1201-9712
DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2023.04.314