Loading…

MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS BETWEEN NIPAH VIRUS V AND DNA DAMAGE-BINDING PROTEIN (DDB1): A COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR DOCKING STUDY

The Nipah virus (NiV) V protein has been associated with evasion of host cell interferon (IFN) signal transduction, which promotes STAT degradation by binding to DNA damage-binding protein 1 (DDB1). Recent studies have shown that the NiV V protein was able to interact with DDB1 by its zinc finger do...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of infectious diseases 2023-05, Vol.130, p.S127-S127
Main Authors: Ning, C. Chee, Liew, Y.J.M., bin Jonet, M.A., Chang, L.-Y.
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page S127
container_issue
container_start_page S127
container_title International journal of infectious diseases
container_volume 130
creator Ning, C. Chee
Liew, Y.J.M.
bin Jonet, M.A.
Chang, L.-Y.
description The Nipah virus (NiV) V protein has been associated with evasion of host cell interferon (IFN) signal transduction, which promotes STAT degradation by binding to DNA damage-binding protein 1 (DDB1). Recent studies have shown that the NiV V protein was able to interact with DDB1 by its zinc finger domain (ZnFD) at C-terminal region (CTD). In this study, the molecular interactions between the NiV V proteins from two NiV isolates (NiV pig isolate, iP-V and NiV bat isolate, iB-V) and DDB1 protein were examined using computational molecular docking studies. The iP-V was noted to have a lower binding affinity (-13.2kcal/mol) and a total stabilization energy of -344.23kJ/mol toward DDB1 compared to iB-V, which has a binding affinity of -13.7kcal/mol and stabilization energy of -450.83kJ/mol. The iP-V interacted with DDB1 at amino acid residue positions 366 to 456, which involved both the NTD and CTD of V protein; while the interaction of iB-V with DDB1 was identified at the NTD only, at positions 2 to 172. There were two mutations identified in the CTD of iB-V, which is the zinc binding domain; therefore, it lacks one zinc ion in its ZnFD for interaction with DDB1. Nevertheless, the interaction of iP-V and iB-V with DDB1 involved three conserved residues on DDB1 (Tyr906, Arg928, and Phe1003). Additionally, the iP- V and iB-V bind to the beta-propeller A (BPA), beta-propeller C (BPC), and CTD of DDB1. The findings from this study demonstrated that the binding region of iB-V to DDB1 was different from that of iP-V due to the lack of one ZnFD in iB- V. Future studies such as site-directed mutagenesis of key amino acid residues will be needed to further confirm the interaction profile.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.04.314
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3bb9cb737f834839ae75e8a83d9540a3</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1201971223004435</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3bb9cb737f834839ae75e8a83d9540a3</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>S1201971223004435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d1194-2344c1a108be24dc4aa201d4c793b23746255e2c088e79484c97249bc17ad9b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkU1LxDAURbtQ8PMPuMpSF635mkkibjJtHYOddJhpFVchTaOkqCOdQRD_vK0Krh48eOfdy4miMwQTBNH0sktCF9oEQ0wSSBOC6F50iDBEsWAIH0RH220HIaTTKT-MvhZlkad1IVdA6SpfybRSpV6DWV495LkGWi3lLbhXq3oN7oHUGci0BJlcyHkez5TOlJ6D5aqscqXBeZbN0MUVkCAtF8u6kiNLFuD_R1amd-PFuqqzx5No_8m-bP3p3zyO6pu8Sm_jopyrVBZxi5CgMSaUOmQR5I3HtHXU2qFMSx0TpMGE0SmeTDx2kHPPBOXUCYapaBxithWNIMeR-uW2G9uZ9z682v7TbGwwP4tN_2xsvwvuxRvSNMI1jLAnTignwno28dxy0ooJhZYMrOtflh8CfwTfm60L_s35NvTe7QZiMAiaUYTpzCjCjCIMpGYQQb4BGRZz0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS BETWEEN NIPAH VIRUS V AND DNA DAMAGE-BINDING PROTEIN (DDB1): A COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR DOCKING STUDY</title><source>BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ning, C. Chee ; Liew, Y.J.M. ; bin Jonet, M.A. ; Chang, L.-Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ning, C. Chee ; Liew, Y.J.M. ; bin Jonet, M.A. ; Chang, L.-Y.</creatorcontrib><description>The Nipah virus (NiV) V protein has been associated with evasion of host cell interferon (IFN) signal transduction, which promotes STAT degradation by binding to DNA damage-binding protein 1 (DDB1). Recent studies have shown that the NiV V protein was able to interact with DDB1 by its zinc finger domain (ZnFD) at C-terminal region (CTD). In this study, the molecular interactions between the NiV V proteins from two NiV isolates (NiV pig isolate, iP-V and NiV bat isolate, iB-V) and DDB1 protein were examined using computational molecular docking studies. The iP-V was noted to have a lower binding affinity (-13.2kcal/mol) and a total stabilization energy of -344.23kJ/mol toward DDB1 compared to iB-V, which has a binding affinity of -13.7kcal/mol and stabilization energy of -450.83kJ/mol. The iP-V interacted with DDB1 at amino acid residue positions 366 to 456, which involved both the NTD and CTD of V protein; while the interaction of iB-V with DDB1 was identified at the NTD only, at positions 2 to 172. There were two mutations identified in the CTD of iB-V, which is the zinc binding domain; therefore, it lacks one zinc ion in its ZnFD for interaction with DDB1. Nevertheless, the interaction of iP-V and iB-V with DDB1 involved three conserved residues on DDB1 (Tyr906, Arg928, and Phe1003). Additionally, the iP- V and iB-V bind to the beta-propeller A (BPA), beta-propeller C (BPC), and CTD of DDB1. The findings from this study demonstrated that the binding region of iB-V to DDB1 was different from that of iP-V due to the lack of one ZnFD in iB- V. Future studies such as site-directed mutagenesis of key amino acid residues will be needed to further confirm the interaction profile.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1201-9712</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.04.314</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><ispartof>International journal of infectious diseases, 2023-05, Vol.130, p.S127-S127</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971223004435$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ning, C. Chee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liew, Y.J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>bin Jonet, M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, L.-Y.</creatorcontrib><title>MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS BETWEEN NIPAH VIRUS V AND DNA DAMAGE-BINDING PROTEIN (DDB1): A COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR DOCKING STUDY</title><title>International journal of infectious diseases</title><description>The Nipah virus (NiV) V protein has been associated with evasion of host cell interferon (IFN) signal transduction, which promotes STAT degradation by binding to DNA damage-binding protein 1 (DDB1). Recent studies have shown that the NiV V protein was able to interact with DDB1 by its zinc finger domain (ZnFD) at C-terminal region (CTD). In this study, the molecular interactions between the NiV V proteins from two NiV isolates (NiV pig isolate, iP-V and NiV bat isolate, iB-V) and DDB1 protein were examined using computational molecular docking studies. The iP-V was noted to have a lower binding affinity (-13.2kcal/mol) and a total stabilization energy of -344.23kJ/mol toward DDB1 compared to iB-V, which has a binding affinity of -13.7kcal/mol and stabilization energy of -450.83kJ/mol. The iP-V interacted with DDB1 at amino acid residue positions 366 to 456, which involved both the NTD and CTD of V protein; while the interaction of iB-V with DDB1 was identified at the NTD only, at positions 2 to 172. There were two mutations identified in the CTD of iB-V, which is the zinc binding domain; therefore, it lacks one zinc ion in its ZnFD for interaction with DDB1. Nevertheless, the interaction of iP-V and iB-V with DDB1 involved three conserved residues on DDB1 (Tyr906, Arg928, and Phe1003). Additionally, the iP- V and iB-V bind to the beta-propeller A (BPA), beta-propeller C (BPC), and CTD of DDB1. The findings from this study demonstrated that the binding region of iB-V to DDB1 was different from that of iP-V due to the lack of one ZnFD in iB- V. Future studies such as site-directed mutagenesis of key amino acid residues will be needed to further confirm the interaction profile.</description><issn>1201-9712</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkU1LxDAURbtQ8PMPuMpSF635mkkibjJtHYOddJhpFVchTaOkqCOdQRD_vK0Krh48eOfdy4miMwQTBNH0sktCF9oEQ0wSSBOC6F50iDBEsWAIH0RH220HIaTTKT-MvhZlkad1IVdA6SpfybRSpV6DWV495LkGWi3lLbhXq3oN7oHUGci0BJlcyHkez5TOlJ6D5aqscqXBeZbN0MUVkCAtF8u6kiNLFuD_R1amd-PFuqqzx5No_8m-bP3p3zyO6pu8Sm_jopyrVBZxi5CgMSaUOmQR5I3HtHXU2qFMSx0TpMGE0SmeTDx2kHPPBOXUCYapaBxithWNIMeR-uW2G9uZ9z682v7TbGwwP4tN_2xsvwvuxRvSNMI1jLAnTignwno28dxy0ooJhZYMrOtflh8CfwTfm60L_s35NvTe7QZiMAiaUYTpzCjCjCIMpGYQQb4BGRZz0Q</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Ning, C. Chee</creator><creator>Liew, Y.J.M.</creator><creator>bin Jonet, M.A.</creator><creator>Chang, L.-Y.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS BETWEEN NIPAH VIRUS V AND DNA DAMAGE-BINDING PROTEIN (DDB1): A COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR DOCKING STUDY</title><author>Ning, C. Chee ; Liew, Y.J.M. ; bin Jonet, M.A. ; Chang, L.-Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d1194-2344c1a108be24dc4aa201d4c793b23746255e2c088e79484c97249bc17ad9b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ning, C. Chee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liew, Y.J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>bin Jonet, M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, L.-Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>International journal of infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ning, C. Chee</au><au>Liew, Y.J.M.</au><au>bin Jonet, M.A.</au><au>Chang, L.-Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS BETWEEN NIPAH VIRUS V AND DNA DAMAGE-BINDING PROTEIN (DDB1): A COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR DOCKING STUDY</atitle><jtitle>International journal of infectious diseases</jtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>130</volume><spage>S127</spage><epage>S127</epage><pages>S127-S127</pages><issn>1201-9712</issn><abstract>The Nipah virus (NiV) V protein has been associated with evasion of host cell interferon (IFN) signal transduction, which promotes STAT degradation by binding to DNA damage-binding protein 1 (DDB1). Recent studies have shown that the NiV V protein was able to interact with DDB1 by its zinc finger domain (ZnFD) at C-terminal region (CTD). In this study, the molecular interactions between the NiV V proteins from two NiV isolates (NiV pig isolate, iP-V and NiV bat isolate, iB-V) and DDB1 protein were examined using computational molecular docking studies. The iP-V was noted to have a lower binding affinity (-13.2kcal/mol) and a total stabilization energy of -344.23kJ/mol toward DDB1 compared to iB-V, which has a binding affinity of -13.7kcal/mol and stabilization energy of -450.83kJ/mol. The iP-V interacted with DDB1 at amino acid residue positions 366 to 456, which involved both the NTD and CTD of V protein; while the interaction of iB-V with DDB1 was identified at the NTD only, at positions 2 to 172. There were two mutations identified in the CTD of iB-V, which is the zinc binding domain; therefore, it lacks one zinc ion in its ZnFD for interaction with DDB1. Nevertheless, the interaction of iP-V and iB-V with DDB1 involved three conserved residues on DDB1 (Tyr906, Arg928, and Phe1003). Additionally, the iP- V and iB-V bind to the beta-propeller A (BPA), beta-propeller C (BPC), and CTD of DDB1. The findings from this study demonstrated that the binding region of iB-V to DDB1 was different from that of iP-V due to the lack of one ZnFD in iB- V. Future studies such as site-directed mutagenesis of key amino acid residues will be needed to further confirm the interaction profile.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijid.2023.04.314</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1201-9712
ispartof International journal of infectious diseases, 2023-05, Vol.130, p.S127-S127
issn 1201-9712
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3bb9cb737f834839ae75e8a83d9540a3
source BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
title MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS BETWEEN NIPAH VIRUS V AND DNA DAMAGE-BINDING PROTEIN (DDB1): A COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR DOCKING STUDY
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A18%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MOLECULAR%20INTERACTIONS%20BETWEEN%20NIPAH%20VIRUS%20V%20AND%20DNA%20DAMAGE-BINDING%20PROTEIN%20(DDB1):%20A%20COMPUTATIONAL%20MOLECULAR%20DOCKING%20STUDY&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Ning,%20C.%20Chee&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=130&rft.spage=S127&rft.epage=S127&rft.pages=S127-S127&rft.issn=1201-9712&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijid.2023.04.314&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_doaj_%3ES1201971223004435%3C/elsevier_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d1194-2344c1a108be24dc4aa201d4c793b23746255e2c088e79484c97249bc17ad9b93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true