Loading…

Environmental modelling of CO concentration using AI-based approach supported with filters feature extraction: A direct and inverse chemometrics-based simulation

This study explored the first direct and inverse modelling of Carbon monoxide (CO) concentration by applying three different computational approaches namely, Least Square-boost (L-Boost), Hammerstein Weiner (HW), and Multi-variate regression (MVR) models for modelling CO using Sulphur dioxide (SO2),...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sustainable Chemistry for the Environment 2023-08, Vol.2, p.100011, Article 100011
Main Authors: Usman, A.G., Usanase, Natacha, Abba, S.I., Ozsahin, Ilker, Uzun, Berna, Yassin, Mohamed A., Rahman, Syed Masiur, Ozsahin, Dilber Uzun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study explored the first direct and inverse modelling of Carbon monoxide (CO) concentration by applying three different computational approaches namely, Least Square-boost (L-Boost), Hammerstein Weiner (HW), and Multi-variate regression (MVR) models for modelling CO using Sulphur dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and Ozone (O3). Two filters feature extraction methods were used in the input-combinations selection, which was classified into the direct modelling approach (C1) and inverse modelling approach (C2). Four different statistical metrics, including Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency, Person correlation coefficient, mean absolute error and mean absolute percentage error was used in evaluating the performance of the models. Based on the performance skills of the models, it is indicated that the direct modelling approach showed superior performance to the inverse approach. Furthermore, the non-linear models (HW and L-Boost) depict higher performance skills than the linear MVR model. Overall, the L-Boost-C1 models showed higher performance based on statistical metrics.
ISSN:2949-8392
2949-8392
DOI:10.1016/j.scenv.2023.100011