Effectiveness of family connections intervention for family members of persons with personality disorders in two different formats: Online vs face-to-face

• Published in: Internet interventions : the application of information technology in mental and behavioural health 2022-04, Vol.28, p.100532-100532, Article 100532
• Main Authors: Guillén, V., Fonseca-Baeza, S., Fernández-Felipe, I., Botella, C., Baños, R., García-Palacios, A., Marco, J.H.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: (s) from the Special Issue on Digital Health Interventions; Edited by Prf. Harald Baumeister, Prf. David Ebert and Prf. Frank Snoek; Carers; Dialectical behavior therapy; Emotional dysregulation; Family members; Personality disorders; Psychological treatment to relatives; Relatives
• ISSN: 2214-7829; 2214-7829
• DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100532

Personality disorders (PD) have a serious impact on the lives of individuals who suffer from them and those around them. It is common for family members to experience high levels of burden, anxiety, and depression, and deterioration in their quality of life. It is curious that few interventions have been developed for family members of people with PD. However, Family Connections (FC) (Hoffman and Fruzzetti, 2005) is the most empirically supported intervention for family members of people with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). The aim of this study is to explore the effectiveness of online vs face-to-face FC. Given the current social constraints resulting from SARS-CoV-2, interventions have been delivered online and modified. This was a non-randomized pilot study with a pre-post evaluation and two conditions: The sample consisted of 45 family members distributed in two conditions: FC face-to-face (20) performed by groups before the pandemic, and FC online (25), performed by groups during the pandemic. All participants completed the evaluation protocol before and after the intervention. There is a statistically significant improvement in levels of burden (η 2 = 0.471), depression, anxiety, and stress (η 2 = 0.279), family empowerment (η 2 = 0.243), family functioning (η 2 = 0.345), and quality of life (μ2 η 2 = 0.237). There were no differences based on the application format burden (η 2 = 0.134); depression, anxiety, and stress (η 2 = 0.087); family empowerment (η 2 = 0,27), family functioning (η 2 = 0.219); and quality of life (η 2 = 0.006), respectively). This study provides relevant data about the possibility of implementing an intervention in a sample of family members of people with PD in an online format without losing its effectiveness. During the pandemic, and despite the initial reluctance of family members and the therapists to carry out the interventions online, this work shows the effectiveness of the results and the satisfaction of the family members. These results are particularly relevant in a pandemic context, where there was no possibility of providing help in other ways. All of this represents a great step forward in terms of providing psychological treatment.