Automatic and controlled attentional capture by threatening stimuli

The rapid orienting of attention to potential threats would seem to proceed outside of top-down control. However, there is no convincing empirical finding that threatening stimuli only capture attention in a bottom-up way. The present study was designed to investigate the role of top-down and bottom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Heliyon 2019-05, Vol.5 (5), p.e01752-e01752, Article e01752
Main Authors: Fabio, R.A., Caprì, T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Psychology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The rapid orienting of attention to potential threats would seem to proceed outside of top-down control. However, there is no convincing empirical finding that threatening stimuli only capture attention in a bottom-up way. The present study was designed to investigate the role of top-down and bottom-up processes in attentional bias to threats. We report a dot-probe experiment examining spatial cuing (valid and invalid) using threatening (spiders or snakes) or neutral (clownfish) stimuli in two conditions (predictable and unpredictable task). Forty-two students between the ages of 20 and 35 years participated in the study. They performed the probe detection task. Results suggested that threatening stimuli can capture attention, but this attentional effect cannot be regarded as totally bottom-up or automatic. We argue that attentional capture by threatening stimuli could be the result of a mechanism of attention shifting between bottom-up and top-down systems.
ISSN:2405-8440
2405-8440
DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01752