Evaluation of different antimicrobial stewardship models at a rehabilitation hospital: An interrupted time series (ITS) study

• Published in: Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE 2022-03, Vol.2 (1), p.e45-e45, Article e45
• Main Authors: Curran, Jennifer A., Leis, Jerome A., Robinson, Larry, Daneman, Nick, Wan, Michael, Mistry, Asha, Zhang, Sara, Massey, Mridula, Lam, Wendy, Jong, Grace, Elligsen, Marion, Lam, Philip W.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Original
• ISSN: 2732-494X; 2732-494X
• DOI: 10.1017/ash.2022.1

ObjectiveTo evaluate different prospective audit-and-feedback models on antimicrobial prescribing at a rehabilitation hospital. DesignRetrospective interrupted time series (ITS) and qualitative methods. SettingA 178-bed rehabilitation hospital within an academic health sciences center. MethodsITS analysis was used to analyze monthly days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient days (PD) and monthly urine cultures ordered per 1,000 PD. We compared 2 sequential intervention periods to the baseline: (1) a period when a dedicated antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) pharmacist performed prospective audit and feedback and provided urine culture education followed by (2) a period when ward pharmacists performing audit and feedback. We conducted an electronic survey with physicians and semistructured interviews with pharmacists, respectively. ResultsAudit and feedback conducted by an AMS pharmacist resulted in a 24.3% relative reduction in total DOT per 1,000 PD (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.99; P = .04), whereas we detected no difference between ward pharmacist audit and feedback and the baseline (IRR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.53-2.70; P = .65). We detected no statistically significant change in monthly urine-culture orders between the AMS pharmacist period and the baseline (level coefficient, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.65-1.01; P = .07). Compared to baseline, the ward pharmacist period showed a statistically significant increase in urine-culture ordering over time (slope coefficient, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08; P = .02). The barrier most identified by pharmacists was insufficient time. ConclusionsAudit and feedback conducted by an AMS pharmacist in a rehabilitation hospital was associated with decreased antimicrobial use.