Supplemental parenteral nutrition versus usual care in critically ill adults: a pilot randomized controlled study

• Published in: Critical care (London, England) England), 2018-01, Vol.22 (1), p.12-12, Article 12
• Main Authors: Ridley, Emma J, Davies, Andrew R, Parke, Rachael, Bailey, Michael, McArthur, Colin, Gillanders, Lyn, Cooper, D James, McGuinness, Shay
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Clinical nutrition; Clinical trials; Comparative analysis; Critical care; Enteral nutrition; Nutrition therapy; Parenteral nutrition; Patient care; Practice guidelines (Medicine); Randomized controlled trial
• ISSN: 1364-8535; 1466-609X; 1364-8535
• DOI: 10.1186/s13054-018-1939-7

In the critically ill, energy delivery from enteral nutrition (EN) is often less than the estimated energy requirement. Parenteral nutrition (PN) as a supplement to EN may increase energy delivery. We aimed to determine if an individually titrated supplemental PN strategy commenced 48-72 hours following ICU admission and continued for up to 7 days would increase energy delivery to critically ill adults compared to usual care EN delivery. This study was a prospective, parallel group, phase II pilot trial conducted in six intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand. Mechanically ventilated adults with at least one organ failure and EN delivery below 80% of estimated energy requirement in the previous 24 hours received either a supplemental PN strategy (intervention group) or usual care EN delivery. EN in the usual care group could be supplemented with PN if EN remained insufficient after usual methods to optimise delivery were attempted. There were 100 patients included in the study and 99 analysed. Overall, 71% of the study population were male, with a mean (SD) age of 59 (17) years, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of 18.2 (6.7) and body mass index of 29.6 (5.8) kg/m . Significantly greater energy (mean (SD) 1712 (511) calories vs. 1130 (601) calories, p