Assessing the information‐content of messy data to reconstruct population recovery dynamics for the world's rarest primate

• Published in: Ecology and evolution 2024-08, Vol.14 (8), p.e70089-n/a
• Main Authors: Turvey, Samuel T., Lau, Erika Y. X., Duncan, Clare, Ma, Heidi, Liu, Hui
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: bottleneck; Censuses; Confidence intervals; Conservation Ecology; Data collection; Data recovery; data uncertainty; Datasets; Decision making; Estimates; Genetic diversity; Hainan gibbon; Nature reserves; Nomascus hainanus; Polls & surveys; Population decline; Population growth; Population number; Population statistics; Population viability; population viability analysis; small population; Surveys; Threatened species
• ISSN: 2045-7758; 2045-7758
• DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70089

Understanding the dynamics of population recovery in threatened species requires robust longitudinal monitoring datasets. However, evidence‐based decision‐making is often impeded by variable data collection approaches, necessitating critical evaluation of restricted available baselines. The Hainan gibbon, the world's rarest primate, had possibly declined to only seven or eight individuals in 1978 at Bawangling National Nature Reserve but has experienced subsequent population growth. Past population estimates lack detailed reporting of survey effort, and multiple conflicting estimates are available, hindering assessment of gibbon recovery. We investigated all reported estimates of Bawangling gibbon population size from 1978 to 2022, to evaluate the biological signal of population trends and the extent to which noise associated with varying survey effort, reporting and estimation may mask or misrepresent any underlying signal. This longitudinal dataset demonstrates that the Bawangling population experienced a series of bottlenecks and recoveries, with three successive periods of growth interspersed by population crashes (1978–1989, 1989–2000 and 2000–2022). The rate of gibbon population recovery was progressively slower over time in each successive period of growth, and this potential decline in recovery rate following serial bottlenecks suggests that additional management strategies may be required alongside “nature‐based solutions” for this species. However, population viability analysis suggests the 1978 founder population is unlikely to have been as low as seven individuals, raising concerns for interpreting reported historical population counts and understanding the dynamics of the species' recovery. We caution against overinterpreting potential signals within “messy” conservation datasets, and we emphasise the crucial importance of standardised replicable survey methods and transparent reporting of data and effort in all future surveys of Hainan gibbons and other highly threatened species. Reappraisal of Hainan gibbon historical data shows slower recovery after successive bottlenecks, suggesting escalating demographic impacts. However, past population estimates are unlikely to all be accurate, raising concerns for understanding the species' recovery dynamics. We highlight the risk of overinterpreting potential signals within historical datasets and the importance of analysing such data using appropriate frameworks that accommodate inherent noise and bi