Loading…

Radiomics Analysis Based on Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and T2 Weighted Imaging for Differentiation of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors From Solid Pseudopapillary Tumors

To develop and validate a radiomics model of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and T2 weighted imaging for discriminating pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) from solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs). Sixty-six patients with histopathological confirmed PNETs ( = 31) and SPTs ( = 35) were enrolled...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in oncology 2020-08, Vol.10, p.1624
Main Authors: Shi, Yan-Jie, Zhu, Hai-Tao, Liu, Yu-Liang, Wei, Yi-Yuan, Qin, Xiu-Bo, Zhang, Xiao-Yan, Li, Xiao-Ting, Sun, Ying-Shi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To develop and validate a radiomics model of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and T2 weighted imaging for discriminating pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) from solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs). Sixty-six patients with histopathological confirmed PNETs ( = 31) and SPTs ( = 35) were enrolled in this study. ROIs of tumors were manually drawn on each slice at T2WI and DWI ( = 1,500 s/mm ) from 3T MRI. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the interobserver agreement. Mean diffusivity (MD) and mean kurtosis (MK) were derived from DKI. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression were used for feature selection. MD and MK had a moderate diagnostic performancewith the area under curve (AUC) of 0.71 and 0.65, respectively. A radiomics model, which incorporated sex and age of patients and radiomics signature of the tumor, showed excellent discrimination performance with AUC of 0.97 and 0.86 in the primary and validation cohort. Moreover, the new model had better diagnostic performance than that of MD ( = 0.023) and MK ( = 0.004), and showed excellent differentiation with a sensitivity of 95.00% and specificity of 91.67% in primary cohort, and the sensitivity of 90.91% and specificity of 81.82% in the validation cohort. The accuracy of radiomics analysis, radiologist 1, and radiologist 2 for diagnosing SPTs and PNETs were 92.42, 77.27, and 78.79%, respectively. The accuracy of radiomics analysis was significantly higher than that of subjective diagnosis ( < 0.05). Radiomics model could improve the diagnostic accuracy of SPTs and PNETs and contribute to determining an appropriate treatment strategy for pancreatic tumors.
ISSN:2234-943X
2234-943X
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2020.01624