Loading…

Comparison of Pin Mill and Hammer Mill in the Fine Grinding of Sphagnum Moss

Dried sphagnum moss was ground using a pin mill and a hammer mill under various operating conditions, i.e., changes in the rotor frequency and feed rate. The specific energy consumption of the size reduction was recorded. The ground powder was characterized by median particle size, width of size dis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energies (Basel) 2023-03, Vol.16 (5), p.2437
Main Author: Ämmälä, Ari
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f74fe23c85d6133cdfc777dfa6f08cbb58c88763d3d8345f7cafc990f17f26bb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f74fe23c85d6133cdfc777dfa6f08cbb58c88763d3d8345f7cafc990f17f26bb3
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2437
container_title Energies (Basel)
container_volume 16
creator Ämmälä, Ari
description Dried sphagnum moss was ground using a pin mill and a hammer mill under various operating conditions, i.e., changes in the rotor frequency and feed rate. The specific energy consumption of the size reduction was recorded. The ground powder was characterized by median particle size, width of size distribution (span), loose and tapped bulk densities, and the Hausner ratio. Pin milling used less energy for size reduction than hammer milling, especially when the target size was below 100 μm. In both milling methods, the specific energy consumption was mainly caused by the rotor frequency used. However, in pin milling, the specific energy consumption was also dependent on the production rate: the higher the rate, the higher the energy consumption. No such dependence was observed with the hammer mill. The span was wider in pin milling than hammer milling in the intermediate product size range although the difference decreased at the fine and coarse ends. A similar pattern was found for bulk densities. However, the flowability of powder, as characterized by the Hausner ratio, was comparable between the grinding methods.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/en16052437
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_56bad8e80d5049c2bd8fd2ca823d342d</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A741846351</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_56bad8e80d5049c2bd8fd2ca823d342d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A741846351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f74fe23c85d6133cdfc777dfa6f08cbb58c88763d3d8345f7cafc990f17f26bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkUtLAzEUhQdRsGg3_oIBd0JrMnnOshT7gBYFdR0yeUxTZpIxM134700dUXMXyT3c83HIzbI7COYIleDReEgBKTBiF9kEliWdQcDQ5b_3dTbt-yNIByGIEJpku2VoOxldH3webP7ifL53TZNLr_ONbFsTxz7pw8HkK-dNvo7Oa-frs-G1O8jan9p8H_r-NruysunN9Oe-yd5XT2_LzWz3vN4uF7uZwgAMM8uwNQVSnGiaUihtFWNMW0kt4KqqCFecM4o00hxhYpmSVpUlsJDZglYVusm2I1cHeRRddK2MnyJIJ76FEGsh4-BUYwShldTccKAJwKUqKs2tLpTkRcLjQifW_cjqYvg4mX4Qx3CKPsUXBeMElhhinKbm41QtE9R5G4YoVSptWqeCN9YlfcEw5JgiApPhYTSomD4mGvsbEwJx3pb42xb6Ah6GhQk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2785194144</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Pin Mill and Hammer Mill in the Fine Grinding of Sphagnum Moss</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Ämmälä, Ari</creator><creatorcontrib>Ämmälä, Ari</creatorcontrib><description>Dried sphagnum moss was ground using a pin mill and a hammer mill under various operating conditions, i.e., changes in the rotor frequency and feed rate. The specific energy consumption of the size reduction was recorded. The ground powder was characterized by median particle size, width of size distribution (span), loose and tapped bulk densities, and the Hausner ratio. Pin milling used less energy for size reduction than hammer milling, especially when the target size was below 100 μm. In both milling methods, the specific energy consumption was mainly caused by the rotor frequency used. However, in pin milling, the specific energy consumption was also dependent on the production rate: the higher the rate, the higher the energy consumption. No such dependence was observed with the hammer mill. The span was wider in pin milling than hammer milling in the intermediate product size range although the difference decreased at the fine and coarse ends. A similar pattern was found for bulk densities. However, the flowability of powder, as characterized by the Hausner ratio, was comparable between the grinding methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/en16052437</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Air flow ; Analysis ; Biomass ; biomaterial ; Bulk density ; comminution ; Energy consumption ; Feed rate ; Fine grinding ; Grain ; Hammer milling ; Hammer mills ; Lignocellulose ; Milling ; Moisture content ; Mosses ; Particle size ; peat ; Peat mosses ; pulverization ; Rotors ; Size distribution ; Size reduction ; Specific energy</subject><ispartof>Energies (Basel), 2023-03, Vol.16 (5), p.2437</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f74fe23c85d6133cdfc777dfa6f08cbb58c88763d3d8345f7cafc990f17f26bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f74fe23c85d6133cdfc777dfa6f08cbb58c88763d3d8345f7cafc990f17f26bb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3450-0364</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2785194144/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2785194144?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ämmälä, Ari</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Pin Mill and Hammer Mill in the Fine Grinding of Sphagnum Moss</title><title>Energies (Basel)</title><description>Dried sphagnum moss was ground using a pin mill and a hammer mill under various operating conditions, i.e., changes in the rotor frequency and feed rate. The specific energy consumption of the size reduction was recorded. The ground powder was characterized by median particle size, width of size distribution (span), loose and tapped bulk densities, and the Hausner ratio. Pin milling used less energy for size reduction than hammer milling, especially when the target size was below 100 μm. In both milling methods, the specific energy consumption was mainly caused by the rotor frequency used. However, in pin milling, the specific energy consumption was also dependent on the production rate: the higher the rate, the higher the energy consumption. No such dependence was observed with the hammer mill. The span was wider in pin milling than hammer milling in the intermediate product size range although the difference decreased at the fine and coarse ends. A similar pattern was found for bulk densities. However, the flowability of powder, as characterized by the Hausner ratio, was comparable between the grinding methods.</description><subject>Air flow</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>biomaterial</subject><subject>Bulk density</subject><subject>comminution</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Feed rate</subject><subject>Fine grinding</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>Hammer milling</subject><subject>Hammer mills</subject><subject>Lignocellulose</subject><subject>Milling</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Mosses</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>peat</subject><subject>Peat mosses</subject><subject>pulverization</subject><subject>Rotors</subject><subject>Size distribution</subject><subject>Size reduction</subject><subject>Specific energy</subject><issn>1996-1073</issn><issn>1996-1073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkUtLAzEUhQdRsGg3_oIBd0JrMnnOshT7gBYFdR0yeUxTZpIxM134700dUXMXyT3c83HIzbI7COYIleDReEgBKTBiF9kEliWdQcDQ5b_3dTbt-yNIByGIEJpku2VoOxldH3webP7ifL53TZNLr_ONbFsTxz7pw8HkK-dNvo7Oa-frs-G1O8jan9p8H_r-NruysunN9Oe-yd5XT2_LzWz3vN4uF7uZwgAMM8uwNQVSnGiaUihtFWNMW0kt4KqqCFecM4o00hxhYpmSVpUlsJDZglYVusm2I1cHeRRddK2MnyJIJ76FEGsh4-BUYwShldTccKAJwKUqKs2tLpTkRcLjQifW_cjqYvg4mX4Qx3CKPsUXBeMElhhinKbm41QtE9R5G4YoVSptWqeCN9YlfcEw5JgiApPhYTSomD4mGvsbEwJx3pb42xb6Ah6GhQk</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Ämmälä, Ari</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3450-0364</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Comparison of Pin Mill and Hammer Mill in the Fine Grinding of Sphagnum Moss</title><author>Ämmälä, Ari</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f74fe23c85d6133cdfc777dfa6f08cbb58c88763d3d8345f7cafc990f17f26bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Air flow</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>biomaterial</topic><topic>Bulk density</topic><topic>comminution</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Feed rate</topic><topic>Fine grinding</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>Hammer milling</topic><topic>Hammer mills</topic><topic>Lignocellulose</topic><topic>Milling</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Mosses</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>peat</topic><topic>Peat mosses</topic><topic>pulverization</topic><topic>Rotors</topic><topic>Size distribution</topic><topic>Size reduction</topic><topic>Specific energy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ämmälä, Ari</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ämmälä, Ari</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Pin Mill and Hammer Mill in the Fine Grinding of Sphagnum Moss</atitle><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2437</spage><pages>2437-</pages><issn>1996-1073</issn><eissn>1996-1073</eissn><abstract>Dried sphagnum moss was ground using a pin mill and a hammer mill under various operating conditions, i.e., changes in the rotor frequency and feed rate. The specific energy consumption of the size reduction was recorded. The ground powder was characterized by median particle size, width of size distribution (span), loose and tapped bulk densities, and the Hausner ratio. Pin milling used less energy for size reduction than hammer milling, especially when the target size was below 100 μm. In both milling methods, the specific energy consumption was mainly caused by the rotor frequency used. However, in pin milling, the specific energy consumption was also dependent on the production rate: the higher the rate, the higher the energy consumption. No such dependence was observed with the hammer mill. The span was wider in pin milling than hammer milling in the intermediate product size range although the difference decreased at the fine and coarse ends. A similar pattern was found for bulk densities. However, the flowability of powder, as characterized by the Hausner ratio, was comparable between the grinding methods.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/en16052437</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3450-0364</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1996-1073
ispartof Energies (Basel), 2023-03, Vol.16 (5), p.2437
issn 1996-1073
1996-1073
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_56bad8e80d5049c2bd8fd2ca823d342d
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Air flow
Analysis
Biomass
biomaterial
Bulk density
comminution
Energy consumption
Feed rate
Fine grinding
Grain
Hammer milling
Hammer mills
Lignocellulose
Milling
Moisture content
Mosses
Particle size
peat
Peat mosses
pulverization
Rotors
Size distribution
Size reduction
Specific energy
title Comparison of Pin Mill and Hammer Mill in the Fine Grinding of Sphagnum Moss
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A16%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Pin%20Mill%20and%20Hammer%20Mill%20in%20the%20Fine%20Grinding%20of%20Sphagnum%20Moss&rft.jtitle=Energies%20(Basel)&rft.au=%C3%84mm%C3%A4l%C3%A4,%20Ari&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2437&rft.pages=2437-&rft.issn=1996-1073&rft.eissn=1996-1073&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/en16052437&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA741846351%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f74fe23c85d6133cdfc777dfa6f08cbb58c88763d3d8345f7cafc990f17f26bb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2785194144&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A741846351&rfr_iscdi=true