Loading…
Comparison of Pin Mill and Hammer Mill in the Fine Grinding of Sphagnum Moss
Dried sphagnum moss was ground using a pin mill and a hammer mill under various operating conditions, i.e., changes in the rotor frequency and feed rate. The specific energy consumption of the size reduction was recorded. The ground powder was characterized by median particle size, width of size dis...
Saved in:
Published in: | Energies (Basel) 2023-03, Vol.16 (5), p.2437 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f74fe23c85d6133cdfc777dfa6f08cbb58c88763d3d8345f7cafc990f17f26bb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f74fe23c85d6133cdfc777dfa6f08cbb58c88763d3d8345f7cafc990f17f26bb3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2437 |
container_title | Energies (Basel) |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Ämmälä, Ari |
description | Dried sphagnum moss was ground using a pin mill and a hammer mill under various operating conditions, i.e., changes in the rotor frequency and feed rate. The specific energy consumption of the size reduction was recorded. The ground powder was characterized by median particle size, width of size distribution (span), loose and tapped bulk densities, and the Hausner ratio. Pin milling used less energy for size reduction than hammer milling, especially when the target size was below 100 μm. In both milling methods, the specific energy consumption was mainly caused by the rotor frequency used. However, in pin milling, the specific energy consumption was also dependent on the production rate: the higher the rate, the higher the energy consumption. No such dependence was observed with the hammer mill. The span was wider in pin milling than hammer milling in the intermediate product size range although the difference decreased at the fine and coarse ends. A similar pattern was found for bulk densities. However, the flowability of powder, as characterized by the Hausner ratio, was comparable between the grinding methods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/en16052437 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_56bad8e80d5049c2bd8fd2ca823d342d</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A741846351</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_56bad8e80d5049c2bd8fd2ca823d342d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A741846351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f74fe23c85d6133cdfc777dfa6f08cbb58c88763d3d8345f7cafc990f17f26bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkUtLAzEUhQdRsGg3_oIBd0JrMnnOshT7gBYFdR0yeUxTZpIxM134700dUXMXyT3c83HIzbI7COYIleDReEgBKTBiF9kEliWdQcDQ5b_3dTbt-yNIByGIEJpku2VoOxldH3webP7ifL53TZNLr_ONbFsTxz7pw8HkK-dNvo7Oa-frs-G1O8jan9p8H_r-NruysunN9Oe-yd5XT2_LzWz3vN4uF7uZwgAMM8uwNQVSnGiaUihtFWNMW0kt4KqqCFecM4o00hxhYpmSVpUlsJDZglYVusm2I1cHeRRddK2MnyJIJ76FEGsh4-BUYwShldTccKAJwKUqKs2tLpTkRcLjQifW_cjqYvg4mX4Qx3CKPsUXBeMElhhinKbm41QtE9R5G4YoVSptWqeCN9YlfcEw5JgiApPhYTSomD4mGvsbEwJx3pb42xb6Ah6GhQk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2785194144</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Pin Mill and Hammer Mill in the Fine Grinding of Sphagnum Moss</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Ämmälä, Ari</creator><creatorcontrib>Ämmälä, Ari</creatorcontrib><description>Dried sphagnum moss was ground using a pin mill and a hammer mill under various operating conditions, i.e., changes in the rotor frequency and feed rate. The specific energy consumption of the size reduction was recorded. The ground powder was characterized by median particle size, width of size distribution (span), loose and tapped bulk densities, and the Hausner ratio. Pin milling used less energy for size reduction than hammer milling, especially when the target size was below 100 μm. In both milling methods, the specific energy consumption was mainly caused by the rotor frequency used. However, in pin milling, the specific energy consumption was also dependent on the production rate: the higher the rate, the higher the energy consumption. No such dependence was observed with the hammer mill. The span was wider in pin milling than hammer milling in the intermediate product size range although the difference decreased at the fine and coarse ends. A similar pattern was found for bulk densities. However, the flowability of powder, as characterized by the Hausner ratio, was comparable between the grinding methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/en16052437</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Air flow ; Analysis ; Biomass ; biomaterial ; Bulk density ; comminution ; Energy consumption ; Feed rate ; Fine grinding ; Grain ; Hammer milling ; Hammer mills ; Lignocellulose ; Milling ; Moisture content ; Mosses ; Particle size ; peat ; Peat mosses ; pulverization ; Rotors ; Size distribution ; Size reduction ; Specific energy</subject><ispartof>Energies (Basel), 2023-03, Vol.16 (5), p.2437</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f74fe23c85d6133cdfc777dfa6f08cbb58c88763d3d8345f7cafc990f17f26bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f74fe23c85d6133cdfc777dfa6f08cbb58c88763d3d8345f7cafc990f17f26bb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3450-0364</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2785194144/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2785194144?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ämmälä, Ari</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Pin Mill and Hammer Mill in the Fine Grinding of Sphagnum Moss</title><title>Energies (Basel)</title><description>Dried sphagnum moss was ground using a pin mill and a hammer mill under various operating conditions, i.e., changes in the rotor frequency and feed rate. The specific energy consumption of the size reduction was recorded. The ground powder was characterized by median particle size, width of size distribution (span), loose and tapped bulk densities, and the Hausner ratio. Pin milling used less energy for size reduction than hammer milling, especially when the target size was below 100 μm. In both milling methods, the specific energy consumption was mainly caused by the rotor frequency used. However, in pin milling, the specific energy consumption was also dependent on the production rate: the higher the rate, the higher the energy consumption. No such dependence was observed with the hammer mill. The span was wider in pin milling than hammer milling in the intermediate product size range although the difference decreased at the fine and coarse ends. A similar pattern was found for bulk densities. However, the flowability of powder, as characterized by the Hausner ratio, was comparable between the grinding methods.</description><subject>Air flow</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>biomaterial</subject><subject>Bulk density</subject><subject>comminution</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Feed rate</subject><subject>Fine grinding</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>Hammer milling</subject><subject>Hammer mills</subject><subject>Lignocellulose</subject><subject>Milling</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Mosses</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>peat</subject><subject>Peat mosses</subject><subject>pulverization</subject><subject>Rotors</subject><subject>Size distribution</subject><subject>Size reduction</subject><subject>Specific energy</subject><issn>1996-1073</issn><issn>1996-1073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkUtLAzEUhQdRsGg3_oIBd0JrMnnOshT7gBYFdR0yeUxTZpIxM134700dUXMXyT3c83HIzbI7COYIleDReEgBKTBiF9kEliWdQcDQ5b_3dTbt-yNIByGIEJpku2VoOxldH3webP7ifL53TZNLr_ONbFsTxz7pw8HkK-dNvo7Oa-frs-G1O8jan9p8H_r-NruysunN9Oe-yd5XT2_LzWz3vN4uF7uZwgAMM8uwNQVSnGiaUihtFWNMW0kt4KqqCFecM4o00hxhYpmSVpUlsJDZglYVusm2I1cHeRRddK2MnyJIJ76FEGsh4-BUYwShldTccKAJwKUqKs2tLpTkRcLjQifW_cjqYvg4mX4Qx3CKPsUXBeMElhhinKbm41QtE9R5G4YoVSptWqeCN9YlfcEw5JgiApPhYTSomD4mGvsbEwJx3pb42xb6Ah6GhQk</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Ämmälä, Ari</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3450-0364</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Comparison of Pin Mill and Hammer Mill in the Fine Grinding of Sphagnum Moss</title><author>Ämmälä, Ari</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f74fe23c85d6133cdfc777dfa6f08cbb58c88763d3d8345f7cafc990f17f26bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Air flow</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>biomaterial</topic><topic>Bulk density</topic><topic>comminution</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Feed rate</topic><topic>Fine grinding</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>Hammer milling</topic><topic>Hammer mills</topic><topic>Lignocellulose</topic><topic>Milling</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Mosses</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>peat</topic><topic>Peat mosses</topic><topic>pulverization</topic><topic>Rotors</topic><topic>Size distribution</topic><topic>Size reduction</topic><topic>Specific energy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ämmälä, Ari</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ämmälä, Ari</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Pin Mill and Hammer Mill in the Fine Grinding of Sphagnum Moss</atitle><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2437</spage><pages>2437-</pages><issn>1996-1073</issn><eissn>1996-1073</eissn><abstract>Dried sphagnum moss was ground using a pin mill and a hammer mill under various operating conditions, i.e., changes in the rotor frequency and feed rate. The specific energy consumption of the size reduction was recorded. The ground powder was characterized by median particle size, width of size distribution (span), loose and tapped bulk densities, and the Hausner ratio. Pin milling used less energy for size reduction than hammer milling, especially when the target size was below 100 μm. In both milling methods, the specific energy consumption was mainly caused by the rotor frequency used. However, in pin milling, the specific energy consumption was also dependent on the production rate: the higher the rate, the higher the energy consumption. No such dependence was observed with the hammer mill. The span was wider in pin milling than hammer milling in the intermediate product size range although the difference decreased at the fine and coarse ends. A similar pattern was found for bulk densities. However, the flowability of powder, as characterized by the Hausner ratio, was comparable between the grinding methods.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/en16052437</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3450-0364</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1996-1073 |
ispartof | Energies (Basel), 2023-03, Vol.16 (5), p.2437 |
issn | 1996-1073 1996-1073 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_56bad8e80d5049c2bd8fd2ca823d342d |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Air flow Analysis Biomass biomaterial Bulk density comminution Energy consumption Feed rate Fine grinding Grain Hammer milling Hammer mills Lignocellulose Milling Moisture content Mosses Particle size peat Peat mosses pulverization Rotors Size distribution Size reduction Specific energy |
title | Comparison of Pin Mill and Hammer Mill in the Fine Grinding of Sphagnum Moss |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A16%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Pin%20Mill%20and%20Hammer%20Mill%20in%20the%20Fine%20Grinding%20of%20Sphagnum%20Moss&rft.jtitle=Energies%20(Basel)&rft.au=%C3%84mm%C3%A4l%C3%A4,%20Ari&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2437&rft.pages=2437-&rft.issn=1996-1073&rft.eissn=1996-1073&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/en16052437&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA741846351%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-f74fe23c85d6133cdfc777dfa6f08cbb58c88763d3d8345f7cafc990f17f26bb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2785194144&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A741846351&rfr_iscdi=true |