Promoting employee wellbeing and preventing non-clinical mental health problems in the workplace: a preparatory consultation survey

• Published in: Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) England), 2023-08, Vol.18 (1), p.1-17, Article 17
• Main Authors: Coppens, Evelien, Hogg, Bridget, Greiner, Birgit A, Paterson, Charlotte, de Winter, Lars, Mathieu, Sharna, Cresswell-Smith, Johanna, Aust, Birgit, Leduc, Caleb, Van Audenhove, Chantal, Pashoja, Arlinda C, Kim, Dooyoung, Reich, Hanna, Fanaj, Naim, Dushaj, Arilda, Thomson, Katherine, O'Connor, Cliodhna, Moreno-Alcázar, Ana, Amann, Benedikt L, Arensman, Ella
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anxiety; Barriers and facilitators; Burnout; Care and treatment; Careers; Construction; COVID-19; Data analysis; Employees; Evaluation; Gender; Health problems; Health promotion; Healthcare; Information and communication technologies (ICT); Intervention; Labor unions; Managers; Medical personnel; Mental disorders; Mental health; Occupational health; Occupational health and safety; Occupational stress; Pandemics; Qualitative analysis; Risk factors; Small business; Statistical analysis; Stigma; Stress; Surveys; Work environment; Working hours; Workplaces
• ISSN: 1745-6673; 1745-6673
• DOI: 10.1186/s12995-023-00378-2

Background Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face major financial losses due to mental health issues affecting employees at all levels but seldom apply programs to promote wellbeing and prevent mental health issues among employees. To support the development of a multi-country workplace-based mental health intervention for SMEs (MENTUPP), a multinational consultation study was conducted. The study aimed to examine the experiences and needs of SMEs concerning the promotion of employee wellbeing, and the prevention and management of non-clinical mental health problems in workplaces. Methods A survey consisting of open and closed questions was designed to assess key informants' opinion about the acceptability, the use, and the implementation of interventions to promote wellbeing and prevent mental health issues in the workplace. Academic experts and representatives of SME organisations, specific sector organisations, labour or advocacy groups, and occupational health organisations across the nine MENTUPP intervention countries (eight European countries and Australia) were invited to complete the survey. Data were collected via the online platform Qualtrics. Sixty-five of 146 informants responded, representing a 44.5% response rate. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the quantitative data and qualitative data were analysed through thematic analysis. Results Measures to create mentally healthy workplaces were most used in SMEs, while more specific mental health interventions, such as training staff on how to promote wellbeing, were hardly used. Managers lack resources to implement mental health interventions and are concerned about employees spending too much time on these interventions during working hours. Receiving information about the economic benefits of mental health interventions and hearing successful testimonials from other SMEs can persuade managers otherwise. Employees have concerns about confidentiality, discrimination and stigma, and career opportunities when using such interventions. Conclusions The study identifies a variety of challenges, needs and possibilities related to implementing mental health interventions in SMEs. Employers need to be convinced that investing in mental health in the workplace is worth their time and money. This requires more studies on the (cost-)effectiveness of mental health interventions. Once employers are engaged, their knowledge and competencies about how to implement such interventions should be