Loading…

Impact of hypothermia on the biomechanical effect of epithelium-off corneal cross-linking

The corneal cross-linking (CXL) photochemical reaction is essentially dependent on oxygen and hypothermia, which usually leads to higher dissolved oxygen levels in tissues, with potentially greater oxygen availability for treatment. Here, we evaluate whether a reduction of corneal temperature during...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Eye and vision (Novato, Calif.) Calif.), 2021-02, Vol.8 (1), p.4-4, Article 4
Main Authors: Abdshahzadeh, Hormoz, Abrishamchi, Reyhaneh, Torres-Netto, Emilio A, Kling, Sabine, Hafezi, Nikki L, Hillen, Mark, Hafezi, Farhad
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The corneal cross-linking (CXL) photochemical reaction is essentially dependent on oxygen and hypothermia, which usually leads to higher dissolved oxygen levels in tissues, with potentially greater oxygen availability for treatment. Here, we evaluate whether a reduction of corneal temperature during CXL may increase oxygen availability and therefore enhance the CXL biomechanical stiffening effect in ex vivo porcine corneas. One hundred and twelve porcine corneas had their epithelium manually debrided before being soaked with 0.1% hypo-osmolaric riboflavin. These corneas were equally assigned to one of four groups. Groups 2 and 4 underwent accelerated epithelium-off CXL using 9 mW/cm irradiance for 10 min, performed either in a cold room temperature (group 2, 4 °C) or at standard room temperature (group 4, 24 °C). Groups 1 and 3 served as non-cross-linked, temperature-matched controls. Using a stress-strain extensometer, the elastic moduli of 5-mm wide corneal strips were analyzed as an indicator of corneal stiffness. Accelerated epithelium-off CXL led to significant increases in the elastic modulus between 1 and 5% of strain when compared to non-cross-linked controls (P 
ISSN:2326-0254
2326-0246
2326-0254
DOI:10.1186/s40662-021-00229-3