Technology Acceptance of Home-Based Cardiac Telerehabilitation Programs in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: Systematic Scoping Review

• Published in: Journal of medical Internet research 2022-01, Vol.24 (1), p.e34657-e34657
• Main Authors: Ramachandran, Hadassah Joann, Jiang, Ying, Teo, Jun Yi Claire, Yeo, Tee Joo, Wang, Wenru
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acceptance; Angina pectoris; Cardiac patients; Cardiovascular disease; Cardiovascular diseases; Care and treatment; Clinics; Content analysis; Coronary artery disease; Coronary Disease; Coronary heart disease; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; Disease prevention; Exercise; Heart; Home based; Humans; Medical research; Pandemics; Patient-centered care; Physical fitness; Population; Prevention; Rehabilitation; Review; Risk factors; Surveys and Questionnaires; Technology; Technology Acceptance Model; Telemedicine; Telerehabilitation; Usability; Variables
• ISSN: 1438-8871; 1439-4456; 1438-8871
• DOI: 10.2196/34657

An understanding of the technology acceptance of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs is paramount if they are to be designed and delivered to target the needs and preferences of patients with coronary heart disease; however, the current state of technology acceptance of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation has not been systematically evaluated in the literature. We aimed to provide a comprehensive summary of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation technology acceptance in terms of (1) the timing and approaches used and (2) patients' perspectives on its usability, utility, acceptability, acceptance, and external variables. We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus (inception to July 2021) for English-language papers that reported empirical evidence on the technology acceptance of early-phase home-based cardiac telerehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease. Content analysis was undertaken. The search identified 1798 studies, of which 18 studies, with 14 unique home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs, met eligibility criteria. Technology acceptance (of the home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs) was mostly evaluated at intra- and posttrial stages using questionnaires (n=10) and usage data (n=11). The least used approach was evaluation through qualitative interviews (n=3). Usability, utility, acceptability, and acceptance were generally favored. External variables that influenced home-based cardiac telerehabilitation usage included component quality, system quality, facilitating conditions, and intrinsic factors. Home-based cardiac telerehabilitation usability, utility, acceptability, and acceptance were high; yet, a number of external variables influenced acceptance. Findings and recommendations from this review can provide guidance for developing and evaluating patient-centered home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs to stakeholders and clinicians.