Loading…

Using field models and elaborated situational judgment tests to represent situational effects on psychological processes and behavior

·Formally representing Lewinian field theory with path analysis and SEM techniques.·Field models of ESJT data can represent reasons for social behavior.·Field models of ESJT data can represent how situational factors shape behavior.·Power shapes behavior by decreasing belief that bad interactions wi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Current research in ecological and social psychology 2022, Vol.3, p.100068, Article 100068
Main Authors: Wood, Dustin, Lowman, Graham H., Harms, P.D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:·Formally representing Lewinian field theory with path analysis and SEM techniques.·Field models of ESJT data can represent reasons for social behavior.·Field models of ESJT data can represent how situational factors shape behavior.·Power shapes behavior by decreasing belief that bad interactions will be punished. We describe how the effects of situational factors on psychological processes and behavior can be formally represented through field models created from elaborated situational judgment test (ESJT) data. As we detail, ESJTs ‘elaborate’ on standard SJTs by (1) having participants rate the expected outcomes of different responses to a given situation, and sometimes additionally by (2) involving experimental manipulation of particular factors within the situation. ESJT data can then be used to create field models of how the raters expect actions to affect valued outcomes, and how the experimentally manipulated factors affect these expectancies. We illustrate the method in a study where participants were presented with 12 workplace situations in which their coworker in the interaction was randomly described as their manager or their subordinate, and then were asked to describe both their likelihood and the expected effects of responding in different ways to each situation. Results demonstrated that participants described being less likely to express disapproval in situations involving a manager than a subordinate, in part due to expectations that expressing disapproval toward a coworker was less acceptable and more likely to result in punishment (e.g., getting fired) if the coworker was one's manager. We discuss more generally how ESJTs can be used to formally represent the psychological processes shaping behavior, and the effects of situational factors on these processes. [Display omitted] We detail how Lewinian ideas regarding the mediation of situational effects on behavior by the psychological field at a given time can be represented through path modeling of elaborated situational judgment test (ESJT) data. The graphs above show empirically-estimated field models to model how participants differentially perceived situations in which they considered expressing disapproval to a manager (Figure A) versus to a subordinate (Figure B) in situations in situations otherwise described the same way. As shown in Figure C (which estimates the difference of these models), participants tended to expect maintaining good relations with this coworker as being much
ISSN:2666-6227
2666-6227
DOI:10.1016/j.cresp.2022.100068