Is shared decision making an aspect of palliative care integration? An observation of collaboration between oncologists and palliative care professionals

• Published in: BMC palliative care 2024-12, Vol.23 (1), p.279-12, Article 279
• Main Authors: Plançon, Morgane, Ridley, Ashley, Lamore, Kristopher, Tarot, Andréa, Burnod, Alexis, Blot, François, Colombet, Isabelle
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Advance care planning; Cancer; Care and treatment; Clinics; Collaboration; Cooperative Behavior; Data analysis; Data collection; Decision Making; Decision Making, Shared; Ethical aspects; Ethics; Female; France; Humans; Illnesses; Intensive care; Male; Medical cooperation; Medical Oncology - methods; Medical prognosis; Meetings; Methods; Nurses; Oncologists - psychology; Oncology; Oncology, Experimental; Outpatient care facilities; Palliative care; Palliative Care - methods; Palliative Care - psychology; Palliative Care - standards; Palliative treatment; Patient Participation - methods; Patient Participation - psychology; Patients; Physician and patient; Physicians; Professional ethics; Professionals; Qualitative Research; Quality management; Shared making decision; Social aspects
• ISSN: 1472-684X; 1472-684X
• DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01608-y

Early palliative care interventions in oncology, as recommended by international oncology societies, promote patient understanding and support decision-making. At the same time, shared decision-making models are being developed to enhance patient participation as part of a new model of patient-physician relationship. For patients with palliative needs, this participation is essential and helps to avoid futile and aggressive treatments at the end of life. The aim of this study is to observe decision making during meetings between oncology and palliative care professionals, focusing particularly on the components of shared decision-making models, but also on the role played by palliative care professionals. We conducted a non-participant observation of multidisciplinary meetings and outpatient clinic activities in two Comprehensive Cancer Centres in France. Field notes were then coded using thematic content analysis. Deductive analysis was conducted using the observation grid developed from Elwyn's three-talk model. Only a few elements of the different models of shared decision-making are apparent in the multidisciplinary meetings. Palliative care professionals emphasise the importance of involving patients and providing them with information about the advantages and disadvantages of different treatment options. However, patient involvement in decision-making remains difficult in daily practice. Decisions to discontinue oncological treatment are often driven by clinical and biological signs of terminal evolution rather than shared decision-making. There are still cultural and organisational barriers to actual implementation of early integrated onco-palliative care. Promotion of shared decision making can be a strong lever of change which is frequently mobilised by palliative care teams.