3D printed twin block: A feasibility study

• Published in: Annals of 3D printed medicine 2023-08, Vol.11, p.100118, Article 100118
• Main Authors: Chan, Eryn Ling Yi, Song, Yi Lin, Foong, Kelvin Weng Chiong, Chew, Ming Tak
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 3D printing; Class II malocclusion; Digital dentistry; Growth modification; Intra-oral scanning; Twin block
• ISSN: 2666-9641; 2666-9641
• DOI: 10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100118

Twin blocks are appliances used for Class II skeletal discrepancies, where the lower jaw is positioned more posteriorly compared to the upper. The conventional method of fabrication of this appliance is tedious and labour-intensive; hence this study intends to explore the feasibility of a digital workflow to three-dimensionally (3D) print them. Three sets of twin blocks, identical except for amount of offset (0.0 mm, 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm), were designed and 3D printed for 5 anonymized scans of patients with Class II skeletal discrepancies. The intaglio surfaces of the 0.0 mm offset twin blocks were scanned and superimposed onto their original computer-aided-design files. The resultant colour maps, root mean square (RMS) deviations, and percentage in-tolerance values at thresholds of 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm were assessed. The fit and retention of all twin blocks were assessed on their 3D printed models via a fit and retention score (FRS). The median RMS deviation was 0.10 mm; percentage in-tolerance values at thresholds of 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm were 79.90%, and 94.51%. Printing deviations occurred most often at labial and incisal edges anteriorly, and buccal and occlusal surfaces posteriorly. There was no significant difference between the total FRS for the three groups (p = 0.076). However, the frequency of satisfactory scores for upper fit (p = 0.049), lower fit (p = 0.018), upper retention (p = 0.038) and lower retention (p = 0.015) differed significantly between the three groups. This study demonstrated the viability of a digital workflow to 3D print twin blocks. Print accuracy was satisfactory, with 0.1 mm offset providing the best fit and retention.