Combination of tumor markers predicts progression and pathological response in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment

• Published in: BMC gastroenterology 2021-07, Vol.21 (1), p.1-17, Article 283
• Main Authors: Liu, Zining, Wang, Yinkui, Shan, Fei, Ying, Xiangji, Zhang, Yan, Li, Shuangxi, Jia, Yongning, Miao, Rulin, Xue, Kan, Li, Zhemin, Li, Ziyu, Ji, Jiafu
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biomarkers; Cancer; Cancer therapies; Carcinoembryonic antigen; Care and treatment; Chemotherapy; Gastric cancer; Gastroenterology; Gastrointestinal surgery; Laboratories; Medical prognosis; Multivariate analysis; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Neoadjuvant therapy; Nomograms; Oncology, Experimental; Patient outcomes; Patients; Population studies; Population-based studies; Prognosis; Stomach cancer; Survival; Time-dependent ROC; Tumor marker; Tumor markers
• ISSN: 1471-230X; 1471-230X
• DOI: 10.1186/s12876-021-01785-7

Background The prognostic values of preoperative tumor markers (TMs) remain elusive in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment (NACT). This study aimed to assess and establish a novel scoring system incorporating carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA72-4) to enhance prognostic accuracy for progression-free survival (PFS) and pathological response (pCR). Methods Patients' data were retrospectively analyzed from December 2006 to December 2017 in our center. The cutoff value of TMs was determined using the time-dependent receiver operating test characteristics method. These three TMs were allocated 1 point each for the post neoadjuvant chemotherapy combination of tumor markers (post-NACT CTM) scores. The training group comprised 533 patients, responsible for full analysis, and the validation group comprised 137 patients based on the selection protocol. Results Of 533 enrolled patients, 138, 233, 117, and 45 patients scored 0, 1, 2, 3 respectively. The 3-year PFS rate Multivariate analysis revealed that post-NACT CTM score was an independent predictor of PFS (0 vs. 1, HR: 1.34, 95% CI: 0.92-1.96, P = 0.128; 0 vs. 2, HR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.35-3.05, P = 0.001; 0 vs. 3, HR: 2.98, 95% CI: 1.83-4.86, P < 0.001). The time-dependent area under curve (AUC) revealed a consistent highest level for post-NACT CTM than other three single TMs. Lower post-NACT CTM score significantly correlated with higher pCR rate based on multivariate logistic regression (2/3 vs. 1, OR: 2.77, 95% CI: 0.90-8.53, P = 0.077; 2/3 vs. 0, OR: 4.33, 95% CI: 1.38-13.61, P = 0.012). A nomogram was formed with both internal and external validation. Conclusions The post-NACT CTM score system served as a strong independent predictor for PFS and pCR in LAGC patients who received NACT. Further population-based studies are required to confirm our results. Keywords: Gastric cancer, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Tumor marker, Time-dependent ROC, Survival