Meta-analysis of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy for surgical site infections (SSI) in caesarean section surgery

• Published in: Wideochirurgia i inne techniki mało inwazyjne 2023-03, Vol.18 (2), p.224-234
• Main Authors: Zhu, Yi, Dai, Lingyan, Luo, Binjie, Zhang, Lin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: caesarean section; General surgery/Gynecology; Meta-Analysis; negative pressure wound therapy; surgical dressings; surgical site infections
• ISSN: 2299-0054; 1895-4588; 2299-0054
• DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2023.125913

IntroductionNegative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been used in reducing the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) and wound complications across various surgical categories. SSIs are a common post-surgical complication following caesarean section (CS) births, making it necessary to use prophylactic interventions to reduce SSI and wound complication incidences. AimTo conduct an updated meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SSI incidence and wound complications in women undergoing C-sections receiving NPWT or standard dressings after wound closure. Material and methodsA systematic literature review was conducted using MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases, and clinical trial registries for RCTs that involved NPWT versus standard dressings in participants undergoing C-section procedures. The primary outcome was surgical site infection (SSI) and other wound complications (haematoma, dehiscence, seroma. ResultsA total of 11 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis with information from 5,693 patients. A reduction in overall SSI incidence (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.66-0.95, p = 0.01, I2 = 0%) and wound complication rate (RR = 0.86, 0.75 to 0.98, p = 0.02, I2 = 5%) was found with all studies pooled together. Subgroup analyses showed that NPWT did not significantly reduce SSI incidence when stratified by the type of C-section (emergency/elective) whereas the type of NPWT device had a differential effect on SSI reduction, with PICO NPWT systems showing a beneficial effect (RR = 0.72, 0.58 to 0.91, p = 0.006, I2 = 0%) in comparison to the PREVENA closed-incision device (RR = 0.94, 0.68 to 1.29, p = 0.73, I2 = 0%). ConclusionsProphylactic NPWT is useful in reducing the incidence of SSIs in women undergoing C-sections based on synthesis of results from RCTs in obese women (BMI > 30 kg/m2).