Loading…

Ebola Virus Isolation Using Huh-7 Cells has Methodological Advantages and Similar Sensitivity to Isolation Using Other Cell Types and Suckling BALB/c Laboratory Mice

Following the largest Ebola virus disease outbreak from 2013 to 2016, viral RNA has been detected in survivors from semen and breast milk long after disease recovery. However, as there have been few cases of sexual transmission, it is unclear whether every RNA positive fluid sample contains infectio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Viruses 2019-02, Vol.11 (2), p.161
Main Authors: Logue, James, Vargas Licona, Walter, Cooper, Timothy K, Reeder, Becky, Byrum, Russel, Qin, Jing, Deiuliis Murphy, Nicole, Cong, Yu, Bonilla, Amanda, Sword, Jennifer, Weaver, Wade, Kocher, Gregory, Olinger, Gene G, Jahrling, Peter B, Hensley, Lisa E, Bennett, Richard S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-ea6d999918523d8960bce9c9401c6001c1743c592845c392aff200d9616b098a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-ea6d999918523d8960bce9c9401c6001c1743c592845c392aff200d9616b098a3
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 161
container_title Viruses
container_volume 11
creator Logue, James
Vargas Licona, Walter
Cooper, Timothy K
Reeder, Becky
Byrum, Russel
Qin, Jing
Deiuliis Murphy, Nicole
Cong, Yu
Bonilla, Amanda
Sword, Jennifer
Weaver, Wade
Kocher, Gregory
Olinger, Gene G
Jahrling, Peter B
Hensley, Lisa E
Bennett, Richard S
description Following the largest Ebola virus disease outbreak from 2013 to 2016, viral RNA has been detected in survivors from semen and breast milk long after disease recovery. However, as there have been few cases of sexual transmission, it is unclear whether every RNA positive fluid sample contains infectious virus. Virus isolation, typically using cell culture or animal models, can serve as a tool to determine the infectivity of patient samples. However, the sensitivity of these methods has not been assessed for the Ebola virus isolate, Makona. Described here is an efficiency comparison of Ebola virus Makona isolation using Vero E6, Huh-7, monocyte-derived macrophage cells, and suckling laboratory mice. Isolation sensitivity was similar in all methods tested. Laboratory mice and Huh-7 cells were less affected by toxicity from breast milk than Vero E6 and MDM cells. However, the advantages associated with isolation in Huh-7 cells over laboratory mice, including cost effectiveness, sample volume preservation, and a reduction in animal use, make Huh-7 cells the preferred substrate tested for Ebola virus Makona isolation.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/v11020161
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6dc423b59c5a4dab95a8ddfc14706477</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6dc423b59c5a4dab95a8ddfc14706477</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2535309038</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-ea6d999918523d8960bce9c9401c6001c1743c592845c392aff200d9616b098a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplks1uEzEQgFcIREvhwAsgS1zgEDpe_-z6gpRGhUZK1UNbrtas7SQOm3VreyPlgXhPNk0btXCxRzOfP41HUxQfKXxjTMHphlIogUr6qjimSqkRV1S8fhYfFe9SWgFIqaB6WxwxqGoqaH1c_DlvQovkl499ItM0xNmHjtwm3y3IRb8cVWTi2jaRJSZy6fIy2NCGhTfYkrHdYJdx4RLBzpJrv_YtRnLtuuSz3_i8JTn8J73KSxcfpORme_f0tje_2131bDw7OzVkhk2ImEPckktv3PvizRzb5D483ifF7Y_zm8nFaHb1czoZz0aGS5VHDqUdvqxoLUpmayWhMU4ZxYEaCcNBK86MUGXNhWGqxPm8BLBKUtmAqpGdFNO91wZc6bvo1xi3OqDXD4kQFxpj9qZ1WlrDS9YIZQRyi40SWFs7N5RXIHlVDa7ve9dd36ydNa7LEdsX0peVzi_1Imy05BSgFoPgy6MghvvepazXPplhbti50Cdd0ppTJins0M__oKvQx24YlS4FEwwUsHqgvu4pE0NK0c0PzVDQu0XSh0Ua2E_Puz-QT5vD_gJ3XMMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2535309038</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ebola Virus Isolation Using Huh-7 Cells has Methodological Advantages and Similar Sensitivity to Isolation Using Other Cell Types and Suckling BALB/c Laboratory Mice</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Logue, James ; Vargas Licona, Walter ; Cooper, Timothy K ; Reeder, Becky ; Byrum, Russel ; Qin, Jing ; Deiuliis Murphy, Nicole ; Cong, Yu ; Bonilla, Amanda ; Sword, Jennifer ; Weaver, Wade ; Kocher, Gregory ; Olinger, Gene G ; Jahrling, Peter B ; Hensley, Lisa E ; Bennett, Richard S</creator><creatorcontrib>Logue, James ; Vargas Licona, Walter ; Cooper, Timothy K ; Reeder, Becky ; Byrum, Russel ; Qin, Jing ; Deiuliis Murphy, Nicole ; Cong, Yu ; Bonilla, Amanda ; Sword, Jennifer ; Weaver, Wade ; Kocher, Gregory ; Olinger, Gene G ; Jahrling, Peter B ; Hensley, Lisa E ; Bennett, Richard S</creatorcontrib><description>Following the largest Ebola virus disease outbreak from 2013 to 2016, viral RNA has been detected in survivors from semen and breast milk long after disease recovery. However, as there have been few cases of sexual transmission, it is unclear whether every RNA positive fluid sample contains infectious virus. Virus isolation, typically using cell culture or animal models, can serve as a tool to determine the infectivity of patient samples. However, the sensitivity of these methods has not been assessed for the Ebola virus isolate, Makona. Described here is an efficiency comparison of Ebola virus Makona isolation using Vero E6, Huh-7, monocyte-derived macrophage cells, and suckling laboratory mice. Isolation sensitivity was similar in all methods tested. Laboratory mice and Huh-7 cells were less affected by toxicity from breast milk than Vero E6 and MDM cells. However, the advantages associated with isolation in Huh-7 cells over laboratory mice, including cost effectiveness, sample volume preservation, and a reduction in animal use, make Huh-7 cells the preferred substrate tested for Ebola virus Makona isolation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1999-4915</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1999-4915</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/v11020161</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30781518</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Animal models ; Animals ; Animals, Suckling ; Antibiotics ; Breast milk ; Breastfeeding &amp; lactation ; Cell culture ; Cell Line ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Chlorocebus aethiops ; Disease transmission ; Ebola virus ; Ebolavirus ; Ebolavirus - isolation &amp; purification ; Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola - virology ; Huh7 ; Humans ; Infectivity ; Laboratory animals ; Liver cancer ; Macrophages ; Macrophages - virology ; Medical screening ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred BALB C ; Milk, Human - virology ; Monocyte Derived Macrophages ; Monocytes ; Public health ; Semen ; Semen - virology ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Suckling behavior ; Toxicity ; Vero ; Vero Cells ; Viral infections ; Virology - methods ; Virus isolation ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>Viruses, 2019-02, Vol.11 (2), p.161</ispartof><rights>2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 by the authors. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-ea6d999918523d8960bce9c9401c6001c1743c592845c392aff200d9616b098a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-ea6d999918523d8960bce9c9401c6001c1743c592845c392aff200d9616b098a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7410-9741 ; 0000-0001-8798-7714</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2535309038/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2535309038?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30781518$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Logue, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas Licona, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Timothy K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeder, Becky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrum, Russel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deiuliis Murphy, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cong, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonilla, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sword, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Wade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocher, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olinger, Gene G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahrling, Peter B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hensley, Lisa E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Richard S</creatorcontrib><title>Ebola Virus Isolation Using Huh-7 Cells has Methodological Advantages and Similar Sensitivity to Isolation Using Other Cell Types and Suckling BALB/c Laboratory Mice</title><title>Viruses</title><addtitle>Viruses</addtitle><description>Following the largest Ebola virus disease outbreak from 2013 to 2016, viral RNA has been detected in survivors from semen and breast milk long after disease recovery. However, as there have been few cases of sexual transmission, it is unclear whether every RNA positive fluid sample contains infectious virus. Virus isolation, typically using cell culture or animal models, can serve as a tool to determine the infectivity of patient samples. However, the sensitivity of these methods has not been assessed for the Ebola virus isolate, Makona. Described here is an efficiency comparison of Ebola virus Makona isolation using Vero E6, Huh-7, monocyte-derived macrophage cells, and suckling laboratory mice. Isolation sensitivity was similar in all methods tested. Laboratory mice and Huh-7 cells were less affected by toxicity from breast milk than Vero E6 and MDM cells. However, the advantages associated with isolation in Huh-7 cells over laboratory mice, including cost effectiveness, sample volume preservation, and a reduction in animal use, make Huh-7 cells the preferred substrate tested for Ebola virus Makona isolation.</description><subject>Animal models</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Suckling</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Breast milk</subject><subject>Breastfeeding &amp; lactation</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Cell Line</subject><subject>Cell Line, Tumor</subject><subject>Chlorocebus aethiops</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Ebola virus</subject><subject>Ebolavirus</subject><subject>Ebolavirus - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola - virology</subject><subject>Huh7</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectivity</subject><subject>Laboratory animals</subject><subject>Liver cancer</subject><subject>Macrophages</subject><subject>Macrophages - virology</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred BALB C</subject><subject>Milk, Human - virology</subject><subject>Monocyte Derived Macrophages</subject><subject>Monocytes</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Semen</subject><subject>Semen - virology</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Suckling behavior</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Vero</subject><subject>Vero Cells</subject><subject>Viral infections</subject><subject>Virology - methods</subject><subject>Virus isolation</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>1999-4915</issn><issn>1999-4915</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNplks1uEzEQgFcIREvhwAsgS1zgEDpe_-z6gpRGhUZK1UNbrtas7SQOm3VreyPlgXhPNk0btXCxRzOfP41HUxQfKXxjTMHphlIogUr6qjimSqkRV1S8fhYfFe9SWgFIqaB6WxwxqGoqaH1c_DlvQovkl499ItM0xNmHjtwm3y3IRb8cVWTi2jaRJSZy6fIy2NCGhTfYkrHdYJdx4RLBzpJrv_YtRnLtuuSz3_i8JTn8J73KSxcfpORme_f0tje_2131bDw7OzVkhk2ImEPckktv3PvizRzb5D483ifF7Y_zm8nFaHb1czoZz0aGS5VHDqUdvqxoLUpmayWhMU4ZxYEaCcNBK86MUGXNhWGqxPm8BLBKUtmAqpGdFNO91wZc6bvo1xi3OqDXD4kQFxpj9qZ1WlrDS9YIZQRyi40SWFs7N5RXIHlVDa7ve9dd36ydNa7LEdsX0peVzi_1Imy05BSgFoPgy6MghvvepazXPplhbti50Cdd0ppTJins0M__oKvQx24YlS4FEwwUsHqgvu4pE0NK0c0PzVDQu0XSh0Ua2E_Puz-QT5vD_gJ3XMMw</recordid><startdate>20190216</startdate><enddate>20190216</enddate><creator>Logue, James</creator><creator>Vargas Licona, Walter</creator><creator>Cooper, Timothy K</creator><creator>Reeder, Becky</creator><creator>Byrum, Russel</creator><creator>Qin, Jing</creator><creator>Deiuliis Murphy, Nicole</creator><creator>Cong, Yu</creator><creator>Bonilla, Amanda</creator><creator>Sword, Jennifer</creator><creator>Weaver, Wade</creator><creator>Kocher, Gregory</creator><creator>Olinger, Gene G</creator><creator>Jahrling, Peter B</creator><creator>Hensley, Lisa E</creator><creator>Bennett, Richard S</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7410-9741</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8798-7714</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190216</creationdate><title>Ebola Virus Isolation Using Huh-7 Cells has Methodological Advantages and Similar Sensitivity to Isolation Using Other Cell Types and Suckling BALB/c Laboratory Mice</title><author>Logue, James ; Vargas Licona, Walter ; Cooper, Timothy K ; Reeder, Becky ; Byrum, Russel ; Qin, Jing ; Deiuliis Murphy, Nicole ; Cong, Yu ; Bonilla, Amanda ; Sword, Jennifer ; Weaver, Wade ; Kocher, Gregory ; Olinger, Gene G ; Jahrling, Peter B ; Hensley, Lisa E ; Bennett, Richard S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-ea6d999918523d8960bce9c9401c6001c1743c592845c392aff200d9616b098a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animal models</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Suckling</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Breast milk</topic><topic>Breastfeeding &amp; lactation</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Cell Line</topic><topic>Cell Line, Tumor</topic><topic>Chlorocebus aethiops</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Ebola virus</topic><topic>Ebolavirus</topic><topic>Ebolavirus - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola - virology</topic><topic>Huh7</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectivity</topic><topic>Laboratory animals</topic><topic>Liver cancer</topic><topic>Macrophages</topic><topic>Macrophages - virology</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred BALB C</topic><topic>Milk, Human - virology</topic><topic>Monocyte Derived Macrophages</topic><topic>Monocytes</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Semen</topic><topic>Semen - virology</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Suckling behavior</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Vero</topic><topic>Vero Cells</topic><topic>Viral infections</topic><topic>Virology - methods</topic><topic>Virus isolation</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Logue, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas Licona, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Timothy K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeder, Becky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrum, Russel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deiuliis Murphy, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cong, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonilla, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sword, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Wade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocher, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olinger, Gene G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahrling, Peter B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hensley, Lisa E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Richard S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Viruses</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Logue, James</au><au>Vargas Licona, Walter</au><au>Cooper, Timothy K</au><au>Reeder, Becky</au><au>Byrum, Russel</au><au>Qin, Jing</au><au>Deiuliis Murphy, Nicole</au><au>Cong, Yu</au><au>Bonilla, Amanda</au><au>Sword, Jennifer</au><au>Weaver, Wade</au><au>Kocher, Gregory</au><au>Olinger, Gene G</au><au>Jahrling, Peter B</au><au>Hensley, Lisa E</au><au>Bennett, Richard S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ebola Virus Isolation Using Huh-7 Cells has Methodological Advantages and Similar Sensitivity to Isolation Using Other Cell Types and Suckling BALB/c Laboratory Mice</atitle><jtitle>Viruses</jtitle><addtitle>Viruses</addtitle><date>2019-02-16</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>161</spage><pages>161-</pages><issn>1999-4915</issn><eissn>1999-4915</eissn><abstract>Following the largest Ebola virus disease outbreak from 2013 to 2016, viral RNA has been detected in survivors from semen and breast milk long after disease recovery. However, as there have been few cases of sexual transmission, it is unclear whether every RNA positive fluid sample contains infectious virus. Virus isolation, typically using cell culture or animal models, can serve as a tool to determine the infectivity of patient samples. However, the sensitivity of these methods has not been assessed for the Ebola virus isolate, Makona. Described here is an efficiency comparison of Ebola virus Makona isolation using Vero E6, Huh-7, monocyte-derived macrophage cells, and suckling laboratory mice. Isolation sensitivity was similar in all methods tested. Laboratory mice and Huh-7 cells were less affected by toxicity from breast milk than Vero E6 and MDM cells. However, the advantages associated with isolation in Huh-7 cells over laboratory mice, including cost effectiveness, sample volume preservation, and a reduction in animal use, make Huh-7 cells the preferred substrate tested for Ebola virus Makona isolation.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>30781518</pmid><doi>10.3390/v11020161</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7410-9741</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8798-7714</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1999-4915
ispartof Viruses, 2019-02, Vol.11 (2), p.161
issn 1999-4915
1999-4915
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6dc423b59c5a4dab95a8ddfc14706477
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Animal models
Animals
Animals, Suckling
Antibiotics
Breast milk
Breastfeeding & lactation
Cell culture
Cell Line
Cell Line, Tumor
Chlorocebus aethiops
Disease transmission
Ebola virus
Ebolavirus
Ebolavirus - isolation & purification
Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola - virology
Huh7
Humans
Infectivity
Laboratory animals
Liver cancer
Macrophages
Macrophages - virology
Medical screening
Mice
Mice, Inbred BALB C
Milk, Human - virology
Monocyte Derived Macrophages
Monocytes
Public health
Semen
Semen - virology
Sensitivity and Specificity
Suckling behavior
Toxicity
Vero
Vero Cells
Viral infections
Virology - methods
Virus isolation
Viruses
title Ebola Virus Isolation Using Huh-7 Cells has Methodological Advantages and Similar Sensitivity to Isolation Using Other Cell Types and Suckling BALB/c Laboratory Mice
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A55%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ebola%20Virus%20Isolation%20Using%20Huh-7%20Cells%20has%20Methodological%20Advantages%20and%20Similar%20Sensitivity%20to%20Isolation%20Using%20Other%20Cell%20Types%20and%20Suckling%20BALB/c%20Laboratory%20Mice&rft.jtitle=Viruses&rft.au=Logue,%20James&rft.date=2019-02-16&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=161&rft.pages=161-&rft.issn=1999-4915&rft.eissn=1999-4915&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/v11020161&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2535309038%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-ea6d999918523d8960bce9c9401c6001c1743c592845c392aff200d9616b098a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2535309038&rft_id=info:pmid/30781518&rfr_iscdi=true