Loading…
Ebola Virus Isolation Using Huh-7 Cells has Methodological Advantages and Similar Sensitivity to Isolation Using Other Cell Types and Suckling BALB/c Laboratory Mice
Following the largest Ebola virus disease outbreak from 2013 to 2016, viral RNA has been detected in survivors from semen and breast milk long after disease recovery. However, as there have been few cases of sexual transmission, it is unclear whether every RNA positive fluid sample contains infectio...
Saved in:
Published in: | Viruses 2019-02, Vol.11 (2), p.161 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-ea6d999918523d8960bce9c9401c6001c1743c592845c392aff200d9616b098a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-ea6d999918523d8960bce9c9401c6001c1743c592845c392aff200d9616b098a3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 161 |
container_title | Viruses |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Logue, James Vargas Licona, Walter Cooper, Timothy K Reeder, Becky Byrum, Russel Qin, Jing Deiuliis Murphy, Nicole Cong, Yu Bonilla, Amanda Sword, Jennifer Weaver, Wade Kocher, Gregory Olinger, Gene G Jahrling, Peter B Hensley, Lisa E Bennett, Richard S |
description | Following the largest Ebola virus disease outbreak from 2013 to 2016, viral RNA has been detected in survivors from semen and breast milk long after disease recovery. However, as there have been few cases of sexual transmission, it is unclear whether every RNA positive fluid sample contains infectious virus. Virus isolation, typically using cell culture or animal models, can serve as a tool to determine the infectivity of patient samples. However, the sensitivity of these methods has not been assessed for the Ebola virus isolate, Makona. Described here is an efficiency comparison of Ebola virus Makona isolation using Vero E6, Huh-7, monocyte-derived macrophage cells, and suckling laboratory mice. Isolation sensitivity was similar in all methods tested. Laboratory mice and Huh-7 cells were less affected by toxicity from breast milk than Vero E6 and MDM cells. However, the advantages associated with isolation in Huh-7 cells over laboratory mice, including cost effectiveness, sample volume preservation, and a reduction in animal use, make Huh-7 cells the preferred substrate tested for Ebola virus Makona isolation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/v11020161 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6dc423b59c5a4dab95a8ddfc14706477</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6dc423b59c5a4dab95a8ddfc14706477</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2535309038</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-ea6d999918523d8960bce9c9401c6001c1743c592845c392aff200d9616b098a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplks1uEzEQgFcIREvhwAsgS1zgEDpe_-z6gpRGhUZK1UNbrtas7SQOm3VreyPlgXhPNk0btXCxRzOfP41HUxQfKXxjTMHphlIogUr6qjimSqkRV1S8fhYfFe9SWgFIqaB6WxwxqGoqaH1c_DlvQovkl499ItM0xNmHjtwm3y3IRb8cVWTi2jaRJSZy6fIy2NCGhTfYkrHdYJdx4RLBzpJrv_YtRnLtuuSz3_i8JTn8J73KSxcfpORme_f0tje_2131bDw7OzVkhk2ImEPckktv3PvizRzb5D483ifF7Y_zm8nFaHb1czoZz0aGS5VHDqUdvqxoLUpmayWhMU4ZxYEaCcNBK86MUGXNhWGqxPm8BLBKUtmAqpGdFNO91wZc6bvo1xi3OqDXD4kQFxpj9qZ1WlrDS9YIZQRyi40SWFs7N5RXIHlVDa7ve9dd36ydNa7LEdsX0peVzi_1Imy05BSgFoPgy6MghvvepazXPplhbti50Cdd0ppTJins0M__oKvQx24YlS4FEwwUsHqgvu4pE0NK0c0PzVDQu0XSh0Ua2E_Puz-QT5vD_gJ3XMMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2535309038</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ebola Virus Isolation Using Huh-7 Cells has Methodological Advantages and Similar Sensitivity to Isolation Using Other Cell Types and Suckling BALB/c Laboratory Mice</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Logue, James ; Vargas Licona, Walter ; Cooper, Timothy K ; Reeder, Becky ; Byrum, Russel ; Qin, Jing ; Deiuliis Murphy, Nicole ; Cong, Yu ; Bonilla, Amanda ; Sword, Jennifer ; Weaver, Wade ; Kocher, Gregory ; Olinger, Gene G ; Jahrling, Peter B ; Hensley, Lisa E ; Bennett, Richard S</creator><creatorcontrib>Logue, James ; Vargas Licona, Walter ; Cooper, Timothy K ; Reeder, Becky ; Byrum, Russel ; Qin, Jing ; Deiuliis Murphy, Nicole ; Cong, Yu ; Bonilla, Amanda ; Sword, Jennifer ; Weaver, Wade ; Kocher, Gregory ; Olinger, Gene G ; Jahrling, Peter B ; Hensley, Lisa E ; Bennett, Richard S</creatorcontrib><description>Following the largest Ebola virus disease outbreak from 2013 to 2016, viral RNA has been detected in survivors from semen and breast milk long after disease recovery. However, as there have been few cases of sexual transmission, it is unclear whether every RNA positive fluid sample contains infectious virus. Virus isolation, typically using cell culture or animal models, can serve as a tool to determine the infectivity of patient samples. However, the sensitivity of these methods has not been assessed for the Ebola virus isolate, Makona. Described here is an efficiency comparison of Ebola virus Makona isolation using Vero E6, Huh-7, monocyte-derived macrophage cells, and suckling laboratory mice. Isolation sensitivity was similar in all methods tested. Laboratory mice and Huh-7 cells were less affected by toxicity from breast milk than Vero E6 and MDM cells. However, the advantages associated with isolation in Huh-7 cells over laboratory mice, including cost effectiveness, sample volume preservation, and a reduction in animal use, make Huh-7 cells the preferred substrate tested for Ebola virus Makona isolation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1999-4915</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1999-4915</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/v11020161</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30781518</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Animal models ; Animals ; Animals, Suckling ; Antibiotics ; Breast milk ; Breastfeeding & lactation ; Cell culture ; Cell Line ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Chlorocebus aethiops ; Disease transmission ; Ebola virus ; Ebolavirus ; Ebolavirus - isolation & purification ; Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola - virology ; Huh7 ; Humans ; Infectivity ; Laboratory animals ; Liver cancer ; Macrophages ; Macrophages - virology ; Medical screening ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred BALB C ; Milk, Human - virology ; Monocyte Derived Macrophages ; Monocytes ; Public health ; Semen ; Semen - virology ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Suckling behavior ; Toxicity ; Vero ; Vero Cells ; Viral infections ; Virology - methods ; Virus isolation ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>Viruses, 2019-02, Vol.11 (2), p.161</ispartof><rights>2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 by the authors. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-ea6d999918523d8960bce9c9401c6001c1743c592845c392aff200d9616b098a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-ea6d999918523d8960bce9c9401c6001c1743c592845c392aff200d9616b098a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7410-9741 ; 0000-0001-8798-7714</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2535309038/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2535309038?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30781518$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Logue, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas Licona, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Timothy K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeder, Becky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrum, Russel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deiuliis Murphy, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cong, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonilla, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sword, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Wade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocher, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olinger, Gene G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahrling, Peter B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hensley, Lisa E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Richard S</creatorcontrib><title>Ebola Virus Isolation Using Huh-7 Cells has Methodological Advantages and Similar Sensitivity to Isolation Using Other Cell Types and Suckling BALB/c Laboratory Mice</title><title>Viruses</title><addtitle>Viruses</addtitle><description>Following the largest Ebola virus disease outbreak from 2013 to 2016, viral RNA has been detected in survivors from semen and breast milk long after disease recovery. However, as there have been few cases of sexual transmission, it is unclear whether every RNA positive fluid sample contains infectious virus. Virus isolation, typically using cell culture or animal models, can serve as a tool to determine the infectivity of patient samples. However, the sensitivity of these methods has not been assessed for the Ebola virus isolate, Makona. Described here is an efficiency comparison of Ebola virus Makona isolation using Vero E6, Huh-7, monocyte-derived macrophage cells, and suckling laboratory mice. Isolation sensitivity was similar in all methods tested. Laboratory mice and Huh-7 cells were less affected by toxicity from breast milk than Vero E6 and MDM cells. However, the advantages associated with isolation in Huh-7 cells over laboratory mice, including cost effectiveness, sample volume preservation, and a reduction in animal use, make Huh-7 cells the preferred substrate tested for Ebola virus Makona isolation.</description><subject>Animal models</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Suckling</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Breast milk</subject><subject>Breastfeeding & lactation</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Cell Line</subject><subject>Cell Line, Tumor</subject><subject>Chlorocebus aethiops</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Ebola virus</subject><subject>Ebolavirus</subject><subject>Ebolavirus - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola - virology</subject><subject>Huh7</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectivity</subject><subject>Laboratory animals</subject><subject>Liver cancer</subject><subject>Macrophages</subject><subject>Macrophages - virology</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred BALB C</subject><subject>Milk, Human - virology</subject><subject>Monocyte Derived Macrophages</subject><subject>Monocytes</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Semen</subject><subject>Semen - virology</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Suckling behavior</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Vero</subject><subject>Vero Cells</subject><subject>Viral infections</subject><subject>Virology - methods</subject><subject>Virus isolation</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>1999-4915</issn><issn>1999-4915</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNplks1uEzEQgFcIREvhwAsgS1zgEDpe_-z6gpRGhUZK1UNbrtas7SQOm3VreyPlgXhPNk0btXCxRzOfP41HUxQfKXxjTMHphlIogUr6qjimSqkRV1S8fhYfFe9SWgFIqaB6WxwxqGoqaH1c_DlvQovkl499ItM0xNmHjtwm3y3IRb8cVWTi2jaRJSZy6fIy2NCGhTfYkrHdYJdx4RLBzpJrv_YtRnLtuuSz3_i8JTn8J73KSxcfpORme_f0tje_2131bDw7OzVkhk2ImEPckktv3PvizRzb5D483ifF7Y_zm8nFaHb1czoZz0aGS5VHDqUdvqxoLUpmayWhMU4ZxYEaCcNBK86MUGXNhWGqxPm8BLBKUtmAqpGdFNO91wZc6bvo1xi3OqDXD4kQFxpj9qZ1WlrDS9YIZQRyi40SWFs7N5RXIHlVDa7ve9dd36ydNa7LEdsX0peVzi_1Imy05BSgFoPgy6MghvvepazXPplhbti50Cdd0ppTJins0M__oKvQx24YlS4FEwwUsHqgvu4pE0NK0c0PzVDQu0XSh0Ua2E_Puz-QT5vD_gJ3XMMw</recordid><startdate>20190216</startdate><enddate>20190216</enddate><creator>Logue, James</creator><creator>Vargas Licona, Walter</creator><creator>Cooper, Timothy K</creator><creator>Reeder, Becky</creator><creator>Byrum, Russel</creator><creator>Qin, Jing</creator><creator>Deiuliis Murphy, Nicole</creator><creator>Cong, Yu</creator><creator>Bonilla, Amanda</creator><creator>Sword, Jennifer</creator><creator>Weaver, Wade</creator><creator>Kocher, Gregory</creator><creator>Olinger, Gene G</creator><creator>Jahrling, Peter B</creator><creator>Hensley, Lisa E</creator><creator>Bennett, Richard S</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7410-9741</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8798-7714</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190216</creationdate><title>Ebola Virus Isolation Using Huh-7 Cells has Methodological Advantages and Similar Sensitivity to Isolation Using Other Cell Types and Suckling BALB/c Laboratory Mice</title><author>Logue, James ; Vargas Licona, Walter ; Cooper, Timothy K ; Reeder, Becky ; Byrum, Russel ; Qin, Jing ; Deiuliis Murphy, Nicole ; Cong, Yu ; Bonilla, Amanda ; Sword, Jennifer ; Weaver, Wade ; Kocher, Gregory ; Olinger, Gene G ; Jahrling, Peter B ; Hensley, Lisa E ; Bennett, Richard S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-ea6d999918523d8960bce9c9401c6001c1743c592845c392aff200d9616b098a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animal models</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Suckling</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Breast milk</topic><topic>Breastfeeding & lactation</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Cell Line</topic><topic>Cell Line, Tumor</topic><topic>Chlorocebus aethiops</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Ebola virus</topic><topic>Ebolavirus</topic><topic>Ebolavirus - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola - virology</topic><topic>Huh7</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectivity</topic><topic>Laboratory animals</topic><topic>Liver cancer</topic><topic>Macrophages</topic><topic>Macrophages - virology</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred BALB C</topic><topic>Milk, Human - virology</topic><topic>Monocyte Derived Macrophages</topic><topic>Monocytes</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Semen</topic><topic>Semen - virology</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Suckling behavior</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Vero</topic><topic>Vero Cells</topic><topic>Viral infections</topic><topic>Virology - methods</topic><topic>Virus isolation</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Logue, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas Licona, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Timothy K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeder, Becky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrum, Russel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deiuliis Murphy, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cong, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonilla, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sword, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Wade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocher, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olinger, Gene G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahrling, Peter B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hensley, Lisa E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Richard S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Viruses</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Logue, James</au><au>Vargas Licona, Walter</au><au>Cooper, Timothy K</au><au>Reeder, Becky</au><au>Byrum, Russel</au><au>Qin, Jing</au><au>Deiuliis Murphy, Nicole</au><au>Cong, Yu</au><au>Bonilla, Amanda</au><au>Sword, Jennifer</au><au>Weaver, Wade</au><au>Kocher, Gregory</au><au>Olinger, Gene G</au><au>Jahrling, Peter B</au><au>Hensley, Lisa E</au><au>Bennett, Richard S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ebola Virus Isolation Using Huh-7 Cells has Methodological Advantages and Similar Sensitivity to Isolation Using Other Cell Types and Suckling BALB/c Laboratory Mice</atitle><jtitle>Viruses</jtitle><addtitle>Viruses</addtitle><date>2019-02-16</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>161</spage><pages>161-</pages><issn>1999-4915</issn><eissn>1999-4915</eissn><abstract>Following the largest Ebola virus disease outbreak from 2013 to 2016, viral RNA has been detected in survivors from semen and breast milk long after disease recovery. However, as there have been few cases of sexual transmission, it is unclear whether every RNA positive fluid sample contains infectious virus. Virus isolation, typically using cell culture or animal models, can serve as a tool to determine the infectivity of patient samples. However, the sensitivity of these methods has not been assessed for the Ebola virus isolate, Makona. Described here is an efficiency comparison of Ebola virus Makona isolation using Vero E6, Huh-7, monocyte-derived macrophage cells, and suckling laboratory mice. Isolation sensitivity was similar in all methods tested. Laboratory mice and Huh-7 cells were less affected by toxicity from breast milk than Vero E6 and MDM cells. However, the advantages associated with isolation in Huh-7 cells over laboratory mice, including cost effectiveness, sample volume preservation, and a reduction in animal use, make Huh-7 cells the preferred substrate tested for Ebola virus Makona isolation.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>30781518</pmid><doi>10.3390/v11020161</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7410-9741</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8798-7714</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1999-4915 |
ispartof | Viruses, 2019-02, Vol.11 (2), p.161 |
issn | 1999-4915 1999-4915 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6dc423b59c5a4dab95a8ddfc14706477 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Animal models Animals Animals, Suckling Antibiotics Breast milk Breastfeeding & lactation Cell culture Cell Line Cell Line, Tumor Chlorocebus aethiops Disease transmission Ebola virus Ebolavirus Ebolavirus - isolation & purification Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola - virology Huh7 Humans Infectivity Laboratory animals Liver cancer Macrophages Macrophages - virology Medical screening Mice Mice, Inbred BALB C Milk, Human - virology Monocyte Derived Macrophages Monocytes Public health Semen Semen - virology Sensitivity and Specificity Suckling behavior Toxicity Vero Vero Cells Viral infections Virology - methods Virus isolation Viruses |
title | Ebola Virus Isolation Using Huh-7 Cells has Methodological Advantages and Similar Sensitivity to Isolation Using Other Cell Types and Suckling BALB/c Laboratory Mice |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A55%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ebola%20Virus%20Isolation%20Using%20Huh-7%20Cells%20has%20Methodological%20Advantages%20and%20Similar%20Sensitivity%20to%20Isolation%20Using%20Other%20Cell%20Types%20and%20Suckling%20BALB/c%20Laboratory%20Mice&rft.jtitle=Viruses&rft.au=Logue,%20James&rft.date=2019-02-16&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=161&rft.pages=161-&rft.issn=1999-4915&rft.eissn=1999-4915&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/v11020161&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2535309038%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-ea6d999918523d8960bce9c9401c6001c1743c592845c392aff200d9616b098a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2535309038&rft_id=info:pmid/30781518&rfr_iscdi=true |