Loading…

In Situ Airtightness Measurement Using Compressed Air Flow Characteristics

The airtightness of a building has a significant impact on energy savings, structural longevity, and indoor air quality for occupants. Therefore, it is essential to accurately measure the airtightness of buildings, though the widely used fan pressurization method suffers from several shortcomings. F...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energies (Basel) 2023-10, Vol.16 (19), p.6975
Main Authors: Han, Seolyee, Jeong, Hakgeun, Lee, Jinsook, Kim, Jonghun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9c860b16aeee8d7f15570899b41e18ae3b0411840b37f98c4252316c3944ade73
container_end_page
container_issue 19
container_start_page 6975
container_title Energies (Basel)
container_volume 16
creator Han, Seolyee
Jeong, Hakgeun
Lee, Jinsook
Kim, Jonghun
description The airtightness of a building has a significant impact on energy savings, structural longevity, and indoor air quality for occupants. Therefore, it is essential to accurately measure the airtightness of buildings, though the widely used fan pressurization method suffers from several shortcomings. For this reason, transient methods have recently emerged to assess airtightness by monitoring pressure changes over time, but studies using transient methods in this field are rare. In this study, we selected three representative buildings to conduct field tests to verify the practical applicability of the improved transient method. To verify the results of the transient method, we conducted a comparison experiment with the blower door test: a widely used measurement method. When measuring the effective leakage area, the average standard deviation of the transient method was 0.903 cm2, which was much smaller than the blower door test result of 1.488 cm2. In addition, the recorded standard errors ranged from 0.197 cm2 to 0.816 cm2 for the transient method and from 0.269 cm2 to 1.801 cm2 for the blower door test. Notably, the transitional method was more reproducible than the blower door test while showing similar accuracy. Given these results, it is expected that the improved transitional method can be used to evaluate airtightness performance in the field.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/en16196975
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6ff3b50b03c54c1990f2b89aa335d4a8</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A771807692</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6ff3b50b03c54c1990f2b89aa335d4a8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A771807692</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9c860b16aeee8d7f15570899b41e18ae3b0411840b37f98c4252316c3944ade73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUU1rGzEQXUoKNYkv_QULvRWcSjv6PBpTJy4OPbQ-C612ZMvYK1eSKfn3leOSZOYww8x7j_loms-U3ANo8g1HKqgWWvIPzYRqLWaUSLh5l39qpjnvSTUACgCT5sdqbH-Fcm7nIZWw3ZURc26f0OZzwiOOpd3kMG7bRTyeUm3hcEG2y0P82y52NllXMIVcgst3zUdvDxmn_-Nts1l-_714nK1_PqwW8_XMAddlpp0SpKfCIqIapKecS6K07hlFqixCTxilipEepNfKsY53QIUDzZgdUMJts7rqDtHuzSmFo03PJtpgXgoxbY2tu7gDGuE99Jz0BBxnrp6B-K5X2loAPjCrqtaXq9YpxT9nzMXs4zmNdXzTKSm4pB1hFXV_RW1tFQ2jj6UuXn3AY3BxRB9qfS4lVUQK3VXC1yvBpZhzQv86JiXm8ivz9iv4B4QJhBo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2876571204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In Situ Airtightness Measurement Using Compressed Air Flow Characteristics</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Han, Seolyee ; Jeong, Hakgeun ; Lee, Jinsook ; Kim, Jonghun</creator><creatorcontrib>Han, Seolyee ; Jeong, Hakgeun ; Lee, Jinsook ; Kim, Jonghun</creatorcontrib><description>The airtightness of a building has a significant impact on energy savings, structural longevity, and indoor air quality for occupants. Therefore, it is essential to accurately measure the airtightness of buildings, though the widely used fan pressurization method suffers from several shortcomings. For this reason, transient methods have recently emerged to assess airtightness by monitoring pressure changes over time, but studies using transient methods in this field are rare. In this study, we selected three representative buildings to conduct field tests to verify the practical applicability of the improved transient method. To verify the results of the transient method, we conducted a comparison experiment with the blower door test: a widely used measurement method. When measuring the effective leakage area, the average standard deviation of the transient method was 0.903 cm2, which was much smaller than the blower door test result of 1.488 cm2. In addition, the recorded standard errors ranged from 0.197 cm2 to 0.816 cm2 for the transient method and from 0.269 cm2 to 1.801 cm2 for the blower door test. Notably, the transitional method was more reproducible than the blower door test while showing similar accuracy. Given these results, it is expected that the improved transitional method can be used to evaluate airtightness performance in the field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/en16196975</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Air leakage ; airtightness ; blower door ; building envelope ; Buildings ; Compressed air ; Cooling ; Energy consumption ; Experimental methods ; Indoor air quality ; leakage measurement ; Reproducibility ; Research methodology ; transient method ; Windows &amp; doors</subject><ispartof>Energies (Basel), 2023-10, Vol.16 (19), p.6975</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9c860b16aeee8d7f15570899b41e18ae3b0411840b37f98c4252316c3944ade73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5031-185X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2876571204/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2876571204?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Han, Seolyee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Hakgeun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jinsook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jonghun</creatorcontrib><title>In Situ Airtightness Measurement Using Compressed Air Flow Characteristics</title><title>Energies (Basel)</title><description>The airtightness of a building has a significant impact on energy savings, structural longevity, and indoor air quality for occupants. Therefore, it is essential to accurately measure the airtightness of buildings, though the widely used fan pressurization method suffers from several shortcomings. For this reason, transient methods have recently emerged to assess airtightness by monitoring pressure changes over time, but studies using transient methods in this field are rare. In this study, we selected three representative buildings to conduct field tests to verify the practical applicability of the improved transient method. To verify the results of the transient method, we conducted a comparison experiment with the blower door test: a widely used measurement method. When measuring the effective leakage area, the average standard deviation of the transient method was 0.903 cm2, which was much smaller than the blower door test result of 1.488 cm2. In addition, the recorded standard errors ranged from 0.197 cm2 to 0.816 cm2 for the transient method and from 0.269 cm2 to 1.801 cm2 for the blower door test. Notably, the transitional method was more reproducible than the blower door test while showing similar accuracy. Given these results, it is expected that the improved transitional method can be used to evaluate airtightness performance in the field.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Air leakage</subject><subject>airtightness</subject><subject>blower door</subject><subject>building envelope</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Compressed air</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Experimental methods</subject><subject>Indoor air quality</subject><subject>leakage measurement</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>transient method</subject><subject>Windows &amp; doors</subject><issn>1996-1073</issn><issn>1996-1073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUU1rGzEQXUoKNYkv_QULvRWcSjv6PBpTJy4OPbQ-C612ZMvYK1eSKfn3leOSZOYww8x7j_loms-U3ANo8g1HKqgWWvIPzYRqLWaUSLh5l39qpjnvSTUACgCT5sdqbH-Fcm7nIZWw3ZURc26f0OZzwiOOpd3kMG7bRTyeUm3hcEG2y0P82y52NllXMIVcgst3zUdvDxmn_-Nts1l-_714nK1_PqwW8_XMAddlpp0SpKfCIqIapKecS6K07hlFqixCTxilipEepNfKsY53QIUDzZgdUMJts7rqDtHuzSmFo03PJtpgXgoxbY2tu7gDGuE99Jz0BBxnrp6B-K5X2loAPjCrqtaXq9YpxT9nzMXs4zmNdXzTKSm4pB1hFXV_RW1tFQ2jj6UuXn3AY3BxRB9qfS4lVUQK3VXC1yvBpZhzQv86JiXm8ivz9iv4B4QJhBo</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Han, Seolyee</creator><creator>Jeong, Hakgeun</creator><creator>Lee, Jinsook</creator><creator>Kim, Jonghun</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5031-185X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>In Situ Airtightness Measurement Using Compressed Air Flow Characteristics</title><author>Han, Seolyee ; Jeong, Hakgeun ; Lee, Jinsook ; Kim, Jonghun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9c860b16aeee8d7f15570899b41e18ae3b0411840b37f98c4252316c3944ade73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Air leakage</topic><topic>airtightness</topic><topic>blower door</topic><topic>building envelope</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Compressed air</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Experimental methods</topic><topic>Indoor air quality</topic><topic>leakage measurement</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>transient method</topic><topic>Windows &amp; doors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Han, Seolyee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Hakgeun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jinsook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jonghun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Han, Seolyee</au><au>Jeong, Hakgeun</au><au>Lee, Jinsook</au><au>Kim, Jonghun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In Situ Airtightness Measurement Using Compressed Air Flow Characteristics</atitle><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>6975</spage><pages>6975-</pages><issn>1996-1073</issn><eissn>1996-1073</eissn><abstract>The airtightness of a building has a significant impact on energy savings, structural longevity, and indoor air quality for occupants. Therefore, it is essential to accurately measure the airtightness of buildings, though the widely used fan pressurization method suffers from several shortcomings. For this reason, transient methods have recently emerged to assess airtightness by monitoring pressure changes over time, but studies using transient methods in this field are rare. In this study, we selected three representative buildings to conduct field tests to verify the practical applicability of the improved transient method. To verify the results of the transient method, we conducted a comparison experiment with the blower door test: a widely used measurement method. When measuring the effective leakage area, the average standard deviation of the transient method was 0.903 cm2, which was much smaller than the blower door test result of 1.488 cm2. In addition, the recorded standard errors ranged from 0.197 cm2 to 0.816 cm2 for the transient method and from 0.269 cm2 to 1.801 cm2 for the blower door test. Notably, the transitional method was more reproducible than the blower door test while showing similar accuracy. Given these results, it is expected that the improved transitional method can be used to evaluate airtightness performance in the field.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/en16196975</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5031-185X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1996-1073
ispartof Energies (Basel), 2023-10, Vol.16 (19), p.6975
issn 1996-1073
1996-1073
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6ff3b50b03c54c1990f2b89aa335d4a8
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Accuracy
Air leakage
airtightness
blower door
building envelope
Buildings
Compressed air
Cooling
Energy consumption
Experimental methods
Indoor air quality
leakage measurement
Reproducibility
Research methodology
transient method
Windows & doors
title In Situ Airtightness Measurement Using Compressed Air Flow Characteristics
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T02%3A49%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20Situ%20Airtightness%20Measurement%20Using%20Compressed%20Air%20Flow%20Characteristics&rft.jtitle=Energies%20(Basel)&rft.au=Han,%20Seolyee&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=6975&rft.pages=6975-&rft.issn=1996-1073&rft.eissn=1996-1073&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/en16196975&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA771807692%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9c860b16aeee8d7f15570899b41e18ae3b0411840b37f98c4252316c3944ade73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2876571204&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A771807692&rfr_iscdi=true