Loading…
In Situ Airtightness Measurement Using Compressed Air Flow Characteristics
The airtightness of a building has a significant impact on energy savings, structural longevity, and indoor air quality for occupants. Therefore, it is essential to accurately measure the airtightness of buildings, though the widely used fan pressurization method suffers from several shortcomings. F...
Saved in:
Published in: | Energies (Basel) 2023-10, Vol.16 (19), p.6975 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9c860b16aeee8d7f15570899b41e18ae3b0411840b37f98c4252316c3944ade73 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 19 |
container_start_page | 6975 |
container_title | Energies (Basel) |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Han, Seolyee Jeong, Hakgeun Lee, Jinsook Kim, Jonghun |
description | The airtightness of a building has a significant impact on energy savings, structural longevity, and indoor air quality for occupants. Therefore, it is essential to accurately measure the airtightness of buildings, though the widely used fan pressurization method suffers from several shortcomings. For this reason, transient methods have recently emerged to assess airtightness by monitoring pressure changes over time, but studies using transient methods in this field are rare. In this study, we selected three representative buildings to conduct field tests to verify the practical applicability of the improved transient method. To verify the results of the transient method, we conducted a comparison experiment with the blower door test: a widely used measurement method. When measuring the effective leakage area, the average standard deviation of the transient method was 0.903 cm2, which was much smaller than the blower door test result of 1.488 cm2. In addition, the recorded standard errors ranged from 0.197 cm2 to 0.816 cm2 for the transient method and from 0.269 cm2 to 1.801 cm2 for the blower door test. Notably, the transitional method was more reproducible than the blower door test while showing similar accuracy. Given these results, it is expected that the improved transitional method can be used to evaluate airtightness performance in the field. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/en16196975 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6ff3b50b03c54c1990f2b89aa335d4a8</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A771807692</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6ff3b50b03c54c1990f2b89aa335d4a8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A771807692</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9c860b16aeee8d7f15570899b41e18ae3b0411840b37f98c4252316c3944ade73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUU1rGzEQXUoKNYkv_QULvRWcSjv6PBpTJy4OPbQ-C612ZMvYK1eSKfn3leOSZOYww8x7j_loms-U3ANo8g1HKqgWWvIPzYRqLWaUSLh5l39qpjnvSTUACgCT5sdqbH-Fcm7nIZWw3ZURc26f0OZzwiOOpd3kMG7bRTyeUm3hcEG2y0P82y52NllXMIVcgst3zUdvDxmn_-Nts1l-_714nK1_PqwW8_XMAddlpp0SpKfCIqIapKecS6K07hlFqixCTxilipEepNfKsY53QIUDzZgdUMJts7rqDtHuzSmFo03PJtpgXgoxbY2tu7gDGuE99Jz0BBxnrp6B-K5X2loAPjCrqtaXq9YpxT9nzMXs4zmNdXzTKSm4pB1hFXV_RW1tFQ2jj6UuXn3AY3BxRB9qfS4lVUQK3VXC1yvBpZhzQv86JiXm8ivz9iv4B4QJhBo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2876571204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In Situ Airtightness Measurement Using Compressed Air Flow Characteristics</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Han, Seolyee ; Jeong, Hakgeun ; Lee, Jinsook ; Kim, Jonghun</creator><creatorcontrib>Han, Seolyee ; Jeong, Hakgeun ; Lee, Jinsook ; Kim, Jonghun</creatorcontrib><description>The airtightness of a building has a significant impact on energy savings, structural longevity, and indoor air quality for occupants. Therefore, it is essential to accurately measure the airtightness of buildings, though the widely used fan pressurization method suffers from several shortcomings. For this reason, transient methods have recently emerged to assess airtightness by monitoring pressure changes over time, but studies using transient methods in this field are rare. In this study, we selected three representative buildings to conduct field tests to verify the practical applicability of the improved transient method. To verify the results of the transient method, we conducted a comparison experiment with the blower door test: a widely used measurement method. When measuring the effective leakage area, the average standard deviation of the transient method was 0.903 cm2, which was much smaller than the blower door test result of 1.488 cm2. In addition, the recorded standard errors ranged from 0.197 cm2 to 0.816 cm2 for the transient method and from 0.269 cm2 to 1.801 cm2 for the blower door test. Notably, the transitional method was more reproducible than the blower door test while showing similar accuracy. Given these results, it is expected that the improved transitional method can be used to evaluate airtightness performance in the field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/en16196975</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Air leakage ; airtightness ; blower door ; building envelope ; Buildings ; Compressed air ; Cooling ; Energy consumption ; Experimental methods ; Indoor air quality ; leakage measurement ; Reproducibility ; Research methodology ; transient method ; Windows & doors</subject><ispartof>Energies (Basel), 2023-10, Vol.16 (19), p.6975</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9c860b16aeee8d7f15570899b41e18ae3b0411840b37f98c4252316c3944ade73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5031-185X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2876571204/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2876571204?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Han, Seolyee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Hakgeun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jinsook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jonghun</creatorcontrib><title>In Situ Airtightness Measurement Using Compressed Air Flow Characteristics</title><title>Energies (Basel)</title><description>The airtightness of a building has a significant impact on energy savings, structural longevity, and indoor air quality for occupants. Therefore, it is essential to accurately measure the airtightness of buildings, though the widely used fan pressurization method suffers from several shortcomings. For this reason, transient methods have recently emerged to assess airtightness by monitoring pressure changes over time, but studies using transient methods in this field are rare. In this study, we selected three representative buildings to conduct field tests to verify the practical applicability of the improved transient method. To verify the results of the transient method, we conducted a comparison experiment with the blower door test: a widely used measurement method. When measuring the effective leakage area, the average standard deviation of the transient method was 0.903 cm2, which was much smaller than the blower door test result of 1.488 cm2. In addition, the recorded standard errors ranged from 0.197 cm2 to 0.816 cm2 for the transient method and from 0.269 cm2 to 1.801 cm2 for the blower door test. Notably, the transitional method was more reproducible than the blower door test while showing similar accuracy. Given these results, it is expected that the improved transitional method can be used to evaluate airtightness performance in the field.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Air leakage</subject><subject>airtightness</subject><subject>blower door</subject><subject>building envelope</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Compressed air</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Experimental methods</subject><subject>Indoor air quality</subject><subject>leakage measurement</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>transient method</subject><subject>Windows & doors</subject><issn>1996-1073</issn><issn>1996-1073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUU1rGzEQXUoKNYkv_QULvRWcSjv6PBpTJy4OPbQ-C612ZMvYK1eSKfn3leOSZOYww8x7j_loms-U3ANo8g1HKqgWWvIPzYRqLWaUSLh5l39qpjnvSTUACgCT5sdqbH-Fcm7nIZWw3ZURc26f0OZzwiOOpd3kMG7bRTyeUm3hcEG2y0P82y52NllXMIVcgst3zUdvDxmn_-Nts1l-_714nK1_PqwW8_XMAddlpp0SpKfCIqIapKecS6K07hlFqixCTxilipEepNfKsY53QIUDzZgdUMJts7rqDtHuzSmFo03PJtpgXgoxbY2tu7gDGuE99Jz0BBxnrp6B-K5X2loAPjCrqtaXq9YpxT9nzMXs4zmNdXzTKSm4pB1hFXV_RW1tFQ2jj6UuXn3AY3BxRB9qfS4lVUQK3VXC1yvBpZhzQv86JiXm8ivz9iv4B4QJhBo</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Han, Seolyee</creator><creator>Jeong, Hakgeun</creator><creator>Lee, Jinsook</creator><creator>Kim, Jonghun</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5031-185X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>In Situ Airtightness Measurement Using Compressed Air Flow Characteristics</title><author>Han, Seolyee ; Jeong, Hakgeun ; Lee, Jinsook ; Kim, Jonghun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9c860b16aeee8d7f15570899b41e18ae3b0411840b37f98c4252316c3944ade73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Air leakage</topic><topic>airtightness</topic><topic>blower door</topic><topic>building envelope</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Compressed air</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Experimental methods</topic><topic>Indoor air quality</topic><topic>leakage measurement</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>transient method</topic><topic>Windows & doors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Han, Seolyee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Hakgeun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jinsook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jonghun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Han, Seolyee</au><au>Jeong, Hakgeun</au><au>Lee, Jinsook</au><au>Kim, Jonghun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In Situ Airtightness Measurement Using Compressed Air Flow Characteristics</atitle><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>6975</spage><pages>6975-</pages><issn>1996-1073</issn><eissn>1996-1073</eissn><abstract>The airtightness of a building has a significant impact on energy savings, structural longevity, and indoor air quality for occupants. Therefore, it is essential to accurately measure the airtightness of buildings, though the widely used fan pressurization method suffers from several shortcomings. For this reason, transient methods have recently emerged to assess airtightness by monitoring pressure changes over time, but studies using transient methods in this field are rare. In this study, we selected three representative buildings to conduct field tests to verify the practical applicability of the improved transient method. To verify the results of the transient method, we conducted a comparison experiment with the blower door test: a widely used measurement method. When measuring the effective leakage area, the average standard deviation of the transient method was 0.903 cm2, which was much smaller than the blower door test result of 1.488 cm2. In addition, the recorded standard errors ranged from 0.197 cm2 to 0.816 cm2 for the transient method and from 0.269 cm2 to 1.801 cm2 for the blower door test. Notably, the transitional method was more reproducible than the blower door test while showing similar accuracy. Given these results, it is expected that the improved transitional method can be used to evaluate airtightness performance in the field.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/en16196975</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5031-185X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1996-1073 |
ispartof | Energies (Basel), 2023-10, Vol.16 (19), p.6975 |
issn | 1996-1073 1996-1073 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6ff3b50b03c54c1990f2b89aa335d4a8 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Accuracy Air leakage airtightness blower door building envelope Buildings Compressed air Cooling Energy consumption Experimental methods Indoor air quality leakage measurement Reproducibility Research methodology transient method Windows & doors |
title | In Situ Airtightness Measurement Using Compressed Air Flow Characteristics |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T02%3A49%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20Situ%20Airtightness%20Measurement%20Using%20Compressed%20Air%20Flow%20Characteristics&rft.jtitle=Energies%20(Basel)&rft.au=Han,%20Seolyee&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=6975&rft.pages=6975-&rft.issn=1996-1073&rft.eissn=1996-1073&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/en16196975&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA771807692%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9c860b16aeee8d7f15570899b41e18ae3b0411840b37f98c4252316c3944ade73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2876571204&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A771807692&rfr_iscdi=true |