The Coldness of Forgetting: OOO in Philosophy, Archaeology, and History

This article begins by addressing a critique of my book Immaterialism by the archaeologists Þóra Pétursdóttirr and Bjørnar Olsen in their 2018 article “Theory Adrift.” As they see it, I restrict myself in Immaterialism to available historical documentation on the Dutch East India Company (VOC), and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Open Philosophy 2019-09, Vol.2 (1), p.270-279
Main Author: Harman, Graham
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
actor-network theory
archaeology
bjørnar olsen
bruno latour
dutch east india company
graham harman
hot and cold media
marshall mcluhan
object-oriented ontology
þóra pétursdóttirr
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article begins by addressing a critique of my book Immaterialism by the archaeologists Þóra Pétursdóttirr and Bjørnar Olsen in their 2018 article “Theory Adrift.” As they see it, I restrict myself in Immaterialism to available historical documentation on the Dutch East India Company (VOC), and they wonder how my account might have changed if I had discussed more typical archaeological examples instead: wrecked and sunken ships, released ballast, deserted harbors, distributed goods, and derelict fortresses. In response, I argue that my account was not therefore non-archaeological, since ruins are the topic of archaeology only by accident: the real subject of the discipline is what Marshall McLuhan describes as “cold media,” in the sense that they are low in information. McLuhan’s distinction between hot and cold media is shown to be surprisingly analogous to Aristotle’s difference between continua and discrete substances, and some consequences are drawn from this analogy.
ISSN:2543-8875
2543-8875
DOI:10.1515/opphil-2019-0023