The Quality of YouTube Content on Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries Is Low: A Systematic Review of Video Content

• Published in: Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation, 2023-12, Vol.5 (6), p.100769-100769, Article 100769
• Main Authors: Czerwonka, Natalia, Reynolds, Alan W., Saltzman, Bryan M., Alexander, Frank, Trofa, David P., Ahmad, Christopher S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Systematic Review
• ISSN: 2666-061X; 2666-061X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100769

To provide an evaluation of the quality of diagnostic and treatment information regarding ulnar collateral ligament injuries on YouTube. YouTube was searched using the terms “ulnar collateral ligament,” “Tommy John surgery,” and “UCL surgery.” The first 100 results for each 3 terms were screened for inclusion. Each included video was graded based on its diagnostic and treatment content and assigned a quality assessment rating. Video characteristics such as duration, views, and “likes” were recorded and compared between video sources and quality assessment ratings. A total of 120 videos were included in the final analysis. Only 17.5% provided very useful to excellent quality content. Only 3 videos (2.5%) provided excellent quality content; these were all physician-sponsored videos. These 3 videos only achieved an excellent score for diagnostic content; no video achieved an excellent score for treatment content. Most videos were scored as somewhat useful for both diagnostic (40%) and treatment (56.7%) content. Videos classified as somewhat useful had the highest number of average views (27,197), with a mean duration of 7 minutes 40 seconds. The most common video source was physician sponsored (32%), followed by educational (26%). Physician videos had the lowest number of views (5,842 views). The quality of ulnar collateral ligament–related information on YouTube is low. Differential diagnoses for related symptoms, accurate surgical indications, and thorough discussions of adverse outcomes were the most lacking information. Physician-sponsored and educational videos provided the highest-quality information but had the lowest number of average views. Because most Internet users in the United States search for information regarding their medical issues online, it is important to understand the quality of available online medical information. Knowing this can help inform the necessary next steps to improve the quality and comprehensibility of online medical information.