Multilevel perspectives on the implementation of the collaborative care model for depression and anxiety in primary care

• Published in: BMC psychiatry 2024-07, Vol.24 (1), p.519-10, Article 519
• Main Authors: Kordon, Avram, Carroll, Allison J, Fu, Emily, Rosenthal, Lisa J, Rado, Jeffrey T, Jordan, Neil, Brown, C Hendricks, Smith, Justin D
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Analysis; Anxiety; Anxiety - therapy; Behavioral health; Behavioral health care; Cardiovascular disease; Care and treatment; Collaboration; Collaborative care; Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR); Cooperative Behavior; Depression - therapy; Depression, Mental; Ethnicity; Evidence-based medicine; Family medicine; Feedback; Female; Females; Health care teams; Humans; Implementation science; Interviews; Leadership; Male; Managers; Mental depression; Mental disorders; Mental health; Mental Health Services - organization & administration; Methods; Patient compliance; Patients; Primary care; Primary health care; Primary Health Care - organization & administration; Primary nursing; Psychiatric services; Psychiatrists; Qualitative Research; Quality management; Referral and Consultation; Social workers
• ISSN: 1471-244X; 1471-244X
• DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05930-w

The Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) is an evidence-based mental health treatment in primary care. A greater understanding of the determinants of successful CoCM implementation, particularly the characteristics of multi-level implementers, is needed. This study was a process evaluation of the Collaborative Behavioral Health Program (CBHP) study (NCT04321876) in which CoCM was implemented in 11 primary care practices. CBHP implementation included screening for depression and anxiety, referral to CBHP, and treatment with behavioral care managers (BCMs). Interviews were conducted 4- and 15-months post-implementation with BCMs, practice managers, and practice champions (primary care clinicians). We used framework-guided rapid qualitative analysis with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, Version 2.0, focused on the Individuals domain, to analyze response data. These data represented the roles of Mid-Level Leaders (practice managers), Implementation Team Members (clinicians, support staff), Innovation Deliverers (BCMs), and Innovation Recipients (primary care/CBHP patients) and their characteristics (i.e., Need, Capability, Opportunity, Motivation). Mid-level leaders (practice managers) were enthusiastic about CBHP (Motivation), appreciated integrating mental health services into primary care (Need), and had time to assist clinicians (Opportunity). Although CBHP lessened the burden for implementation team members (clinicians, staff; Need), some were hesitant to reallocate patient care (Motivation). Innovation deliverers (BCMs) were eager to deliver CBHP (Motivation) and confident in assisting patients (Capability); their opportunity to deliver CBHP could be limited by clinician referrals (Opportunity). Although CBHP alleviated barriers for innovation recipients (patients; Need), it was difficult to secure services for those with severe conditions (Capability) and certain insurance types (Opportunity). Overall, respondents favored sustaining CoCM and highlighted the positive impacts on the practice, health care team, and patients. Participants emphasized the benefits of integrating mental health services into primary care and how CBHP lessened the burden on clinicians while providing patients with comprehensive care. Barriers to CBHP implementation included ensuring appropriate patient referrals, providing treatment for patients with higher-level needs, and incentivizing clinician engagement. Future CoCM implementation should include strategies