Constructing three emotion knowledge tests from the invariant measurement approach

Psychological constructionist models like the Conceptual Act Theory (CAT) postulate that complex states such as emotions are composed of basic psychological ingredients that are more clearly respected by the brain than basic emotions. The objective of this study was the construction and initial vali...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) CA), 2017-09, Vol.5, p.e3755-e3755, Article e3755
Main Authors: Delgado, Ana R, Prieto, Gerardo, Burin, Debora I
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
Cognition & reasoning
Emotion knowledge
Emotional intelligence
Emotions
Invariant measurement
Knowledge
Neural networks
Neuroscience
Objectivity
Psychiatry and Psychology
Psychological constructionism
Psychological distance
Psychological tests
Rasch model
Sex differences
Statistical analysis
Studies
Theory
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Psychological constructionist models like the Conceptual Act Theory (CAT) postulate that complex states such as emotions are composed of basic psychological ingredients that are more clearly respected by the brain than basic emotions. The objective of this study was the construction and initial validation of Emotion Knowledge measures from the CAT frame by means of an invariant measurement approach, the Rasch Model (RM). Psychological distance theory was used to inform item generation. Three EK tests-emotion vocabulary (EV), close emotional situations (CES) and far emotional situations (FES)-were constructed and tested with the RM in a community sample of 100 females and 100 males (age range: 18-65), both separately and conjointly. It was corroborated that data-RM fit was sufficient. Then, the effect of type of test and emotion on Rasch-modelled item difficulty was tested. Significant effects of emotion on EK item difficulty were found, but the only statistically significant difference was that between "happiness" and the remaining emotions; neither type of test, nor interaction effects on EK item difficulty were statistically significant. The testing of gender differences was carried out after corroborating that differential item functioning (DIF) would not be a plausible alternative hypothesis for the results. No statistically significant sex-related differences were found out in EV, CES, FES, or total EK. However, the sign of indicate that female participants were consistently better than male ones, a result that will be of interest for future meta-analyses. The three EK tests are ready to be used as components of a higher-level measurement process.
ISSN:2167-8359
2167-8359
DOI:10.7717/peerj.3755