Dynamics of bio-based carbon dioxide removal in Germany

• Published in: Scientific reports 2024-09, Vol.14 (1), p.20395-11, Article 20395
• Main Authors: Wollnik, Ronja, Borchers, Malgorzata, Seibert, Ruben, Abel, Susanne, Herrmann, Pierre, Elsasser, Peter, Hildebrandt, Jakob, Meisel, Kathleen, Hofmann, Pia, Radtke, Kai, Selig, Marco, Kazmin, Stanislav, Szarka, Nora, Thrän, Daniela
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 704/106; 704/172; Atmosphere; Biomass; Carbon dioxide; Carbon dioxide removal; Carbon dioxide removal (CDR); Carbon sequestration; Construction industry; Environmental impact; Forestry; Humanities and Social Sciences; Multi-dimensional assessment; multidisciplinary; Negative emissions technologies (NET); Organic soils; Peatlands; Portfolio; Project engineering; Science; Science (multidisciplinary)
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-71017-x

Bio-based carbon dioxide removal encompasses a range of (1) natural sink enhancement concepts in agriculture and on organic soils including peatlands, and in forestry, (2) bio-based building materials, and (3) bioenergy production with CO 2 capture and storage (BECCS). A common database on these concepts is crucial for their consideration in strategies and implementation. In this study, we analyse standardised factsheets on these concepts. We find different dynamics of deployment until 2045: for CO 2 removal rates from the atmosphere, natural sink enhancement concepts are characterised by gradually increasing rates, followed by a saturation and potentially a decrease after few decades; forest-related measures ramp up slowly and for construction projects and bioenergy plants, annually constant removal rates are assumed during operation which drop to zero afterwards. The expenses for removing 1 t CO 2 from the atmosphere were found to be between 8 and 520 € t CO 2 −1 , which arises from high divergence both in capital and operational expenditures among the concepts. This high variability of expenses seems to suggest the more cost-effective concepts should be implemented first. However, aspects from economics, resource base and environmental impacts to social and political implications for Germany need to be considered for developing implementation strategies. All concepts investigated could be deployed on scales to significantly contribute to the German climate neutrality target.