Loading…

MCMC methods applied to the reconstruction of the autumn 2017 Ruthenium-106 atmospheric contamination source

In autumn 2017, small amounts of Ruthenium-106 of unknown origin were detected in Europe by several independent monitoring networks. To study the dispersion of this radionuclide, inverse modelling methods are applied to retrieve the location, time, duration and magnitude of the source. The inverse p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Environment: X 2020-04, Vol.6, p.100071-14, Article 100071
Main Authors: Dumont Le Brazidec, Joffrey, Bocquet, Marc, Saunier, Olivier, Roustan, Yelva
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In autumn 2017, small amounts of Ruthenium-106 of unknown origin were detected in Europe by several independent monitoring networks. To study the dispersion of this radionuclide, inverse modelling methods are applied to retrieve the location, time, duration and magnitude of the source. The inverse problem is solved within the Bayesian framework to yield a full reconstruction of the uncertainties. We first develop a classical Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method - the Metropolis Hastings (MH) algorithm - to reconstruct the source. However, the algorithm fails to converge in acceptable time because of local minima of the cost function, whose existence is due to a poor distribution of the observations. To overcome this obstacle, the parallel tempering algorithm, an enhanced MCMC method, is assessed and applied to the Ruthenium dispersion event. The convergence of the algorithm is studied and keys to implement and accelerate it are provided. The probability distribution functions of the variables associated with the source and the observation errors are obtained: they point to an area in south Ural and a total release of several hundreds of TBq on the 26th of September 2017. The results are compared and proven to be consistent with other estimates. Moreover, the method converges fast enough to make it suitable for operational use. •We estimate the location and the temporal evolution of the source term of the Ruthenium 106 dispersion event in fall 2017.•We tackle the problem within a Bayesian framework, which allows a full reconstruction of the uncertainties.•We implement an advanced MCMC method, the parallel tempering algorithm, for an efficient uncertainty quantification.•We show that the source is most likely located in southern Ural.•We show that the total quantity of 106 Ru released ranges between 100 and 200 Tbq.
ISSN:2590-1621
1352-2310
2590-1621
1873-2844
DOI:10.1016/j.aeaoa.2020.100071