Loading…

WHO International Standard for evaluation of the antibody response to COVID-19 vaccines: call for urgent action by the scientific community

SummaryThe first WHO International Standard and International Reference Panel for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin were established by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization in December, 2020. The WHO International Antibody Standards are intended to serve as global reference reagents,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Lancet. Microbe 2022-03, Vol.3 (3), p.e235-e240
Main Authors: Knezevic, Ivana, PhD, Mattiuzzo, Giada, PhD, Page, Mark, PhD, Minor, Philip, PhD, Griffiths, Elwyn, PhD, Nuebling, Micha, PhD, Moorthy, Vasee, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:SummaryThe first WHO International Standard and International Reference Panel for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin were established by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization in December, 2020. The WHO International Antibody Standards are intended to serve as global reference reagents, against which national reference preparations or secondary standards can be calibrated. Calibration will facilitate comparison of results of assays (eg, of the neutralising antibody response to candidate COVID-19 vaccines) conducted in different countries. Use of these standards is expected to contribute to better understanding of the immune response, and particularly of the correlates of protection. This Personal View provides some technical details of the WHO Antibody Standards for SARS-CoV-2, focusing specifically on the use of these standards for the evaluation of the immune response to COVID-19 vaccines, rather than other applications (eg, diagnostic or therapeutic). The explanation with regard to why rapid adoption of the standards is crucial is also included, as well as how funders, journals, regulators, and ethics committees could drive adoption in the interest of public health.
ISSN:2666-5247
2666-5247
DOI:10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00266-4