Evaluation of brushing efficiency in reducing oral microbiota in mechanically ventilated patients admitted to an intensive care unit

• Published in: Infection prevention in practice 2024-03, Vol.6 (1), p.100346-100346, Article 100346
• Main Authors: Santos Zambrano, Thainah Bruna, Guillén Vivas, Ximena Sayonara, Santos, Caísa Batista, de Fátima Mestre, Viviane, Maddela, Naga Raju, Galarza Santana, Lucia Elena, Couto de Almeida, Ricardo Sergio
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Dental biofilm; Intensive care unit; Oral hygiene; Original
• ISSN: 2590-0889; 2590-0889
• DOI: 10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100346

Patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) are at greater risk of developing nosocomial infections due to their investigations, treatment and changes in the immune system. One of the most prevalent nosocomial infections is respiratory tract infection, such as hospital acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The bacteria commonly found in the oral cavity in the hospital environment are Streptococcus viridians, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus spp., and Klebsiella pneumoniae. There is a need to test and define appropriate standard protocols for oral hygiene in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in ICUs through the intervention of a dental specialist, preventing the proliferation of microorganisms into the respiratory tract, thus reducing hospitalization time, the use of antibiotics, and increased morbidity/mortality. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of dental brushing in the reduction of the pathogenic buccal microbiota associated with mechanical ventilation in patients admitted to the Evangelical Hospital from Londrina, Paraná, Brazil. The sample consisted of 90 patients (of both sexes), mean age of 65 years, under mechanical ventilation by orotracheal tube and tracheostomized patients, without suspected or confirmed diagnosis of pneumonia. Patients were randomized ∗∗∗ Results showed that oral hygiene using a toothbrush by suction, with chlorhexidine gel 0.12% (Group B), was more effective than conventional hygiene using gauze soaked with chlorhexidine 0.12% (Group A) in reducing pathogenic buccal microbiota. There was a reduction of the pathogenic buccal microbiota in mechanically ventilated patients receiving oral hygiene using a toothbrush by suction with chlorhexidine gel 0.12% (Group B)