Loading…
On parameter bias in earthquake sequence models using data assimilation
The feasibility of physics-based forecasting of earthquakes depends on how well models can be calibrated to represent earthquake scenarios given uncertainties in both models and data. We investigate whether data assimilation can estimate current and future fault states, i.e., slip rate and shear str...
Saved in:
Published in: | Nonlinear processes in geophysics 2023-04, Vol.30 (2), p.101-115 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The feasibility of physics-based forecasting of earthquakes depends on how well models can be calibrated to represent earthquake scenarios given
uncertainties in both models and data. We investigate whether data assimilation can estimate current and future fault states, i.e., slip rate and
shear stress, in the presence of a bias in the friction parameter. We perform state estimation as well as combined state-parameter estimation using
a sequential-importance resampling particle filter in a zero-dimensional (0D) generalization of the Burridge–Knopoff spring–block model with rate-and-state
friction. Minor changes in the friction parameter ϵ can lead to different state trajectories and earthquake characteristics. The
performance of data assimilation with respect to estimating the fault state in the presence of a parameter bias in ϵ depends on the magnitude of the
bias. A small parameter bias in ϵ (+3 %) can be compensated for very well using state estimation (R2 = 0.99), whereas an
intermediate bias (−14 %) can only be partly compensated for using state estimation (R2 = 0.47). When increasing particle spread by accounting for model error and
an additional resampling step, R2 increases to 0.61. However, when there is a large bias (−43 %) in ϵ, only state-parameter
estimation can fully account for the parameter bias (R2 = 0.97). Thus, simultaneous state and parameter estimation effectively separates the
error contributions from friction and shear stress to correctly estimate the current and future shear stress and slip rate. This illustrates the
potential of data assimilation for the estimation of earthquake sequences and provides insight into its application in other nonlinear processes with
uncertain parameters. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1607-7946 1023-5809 1607-7946 |
DOI: | 10.5194/npg-30-101-2023 |